CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Animal Production Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Sites of Interest
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Lucerne improves some sustainability indicators but may decrease profitability of cropping rotations on the Jimbour Plain

R. B. Murray-Prior A , C , J. Whish B , P. Carberry B and N. Dalgleish B

A Muresk Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Northam, WA 6401, Australia.
B APSRU/CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: R.Murray-Prior@curtin.edu.au


Abstract

Long-run rotational gross margins were calculated with yields derived from biophysical simulations in a crop simulation model over a period of 100 years and prices simulated in @Risk based on subjective triangular price distributions elicited from the Jimbour Plain farmer group. Rotations included chickpeas, cotton, lucerne, sorghum, wheat and different lengths of fallow. The aim was to assess the profitability of rotations with and without lucerne. Output presented to the farmers included mean annual gross margins and distributions of gross margins with box and whisker plots found to be suitable. Mean–standard deviation and first- and second-degree stochastic dominance efficiency measures were also calculated. The paper outlines a method for combining biophysical and price simulations that can be understood by farmers. Including lucerne in the rotations improved some sustainability indicators but reduced profitability.

Keywords: APSIM, modelling rotations.

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(6) 651–663

Submitted: 8 August 2003    Accepted: 3 June 2004    Published: 29 June 2005

Full text DOI: 10.1071/EA03164

© CSIRO 2005

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (187 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2009