CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Australian Journal of Zoology
  Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Bat wing airfoil and planform structures relating to aerodynamic cleanliness

R. D. Bullen A , C and N. L. McKenzie B

A 43 Murray Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025, Australia.
B Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6065, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: bullen2@bigpond.com


Abstract

In this paper we examine 12 species of Western Australian bat for anatomical and morphometric attributes related to wing lift and drag characteristics. We present values for bat wing camber (typically 6.5–9%) and its location, measurements of wing planform and tip shape (typically elliptical but with two different tip designs), dimensions of wing leading-edge flaps (typically 8–10.5% of hand wing chord but with some species having much larger flaps up to 18%) and then discuss several features related to airflow separation control.

All species assessed had thin, low-camber airfoil sections, an optimisation appropriate to the range of Reynolds Numbers in which bats fly. Wing relative cleanliness was consistent with, and functionally appropriate to, species foraging strategy. The interceptors had the point of maximum camber well forward and no trailing edge wing fences, optimisations for minimum drag generation. The air-superiority bats had leading-edge fences optimised for maximum lift generation while maintaining low drag. Surface bats were characterised by their low-aspect-ratio wingtips and the absence of optimisations for either low section drag or high lift. The frugivore and the carnivore appear to be discrete optimisations while the emballinurid had a long and broad leading edge flap in combination with a high-aspect-ratio tip.

We propose a range of lift and drag coefficient values for use in models of metabolic power output.

Australian Journal of Zoology 55(4) 237–247

Submitted: 11 February 2007    Accepted: 21 June 2007    Published: 24 September 2007

Full text DOI: 10.1071/ZO07010

© CSIRO 2007

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (1.1 MB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2009