CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Animal Production Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Sites of Interest
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Sacrificial grazing of wheat crops: identifying tactics and opportunities in Western Australia’s grainbelt using simulation approaches

Lindsay W. Bell A C, John N. G. Hargreaves A, Roger A. Lawes B and Michael J. Robertson B

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems/APSRU, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Private Bag 5, PO Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: lindsay.bell@csiro.au


Abstract

Failing grain crops are sometimes sacrificed for grazing by mixed farmers, a decision involving a complex range of factors. This simulation study used two APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator)-based approaches to investigate the circumstances under which more revenue might be obtained by sacrificing a wheat crop for grazing rather than harvesting it for grain in Western Australia’s grainbelt. First, we developed a simple partial budget calculation to estimate and compare revenue from grain or grazing alternatives using data for grain yield and standing biomass at flowering. This was simulated for a factorial of soil types and locations varying in mean annual rainfall. We then simulated wheat quality and livestock production on spring wheat grazed at different stages of crop development and at a range of stocking rates. Dynamic simulations of grazing showed that livestock production increased as grazing was delayed; stocking rate had little impact at this time. Grazing earlier necessitated lighter stocking rates but surprisingly had little benefit for animal performance. Partial budgets showed that under average commodity prices, grazing a wheat crop could be more profitable 40–75% of the time on poorer soil types in lower rainfall environments. In these situations, by tactically grazing when grain yield is below a critical level economic returns could be increased by more than A$50/ha in 30–40% of years and over the long term average revenues could be increased by A$30/ha.year. This critical grain yield ranged from 1.3 to 1.7 t/ha on shallow gravel soil and 1.9 to 2.2 t/ha on a deep sand. In higher rainfall environments and on better soil types grazing was rarely a better option unless livestock prices were high relative to grain. This approach, combining crop simulation with partial budgets, was useful for developing simple management rules for a complex system. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that making tactical use of a wheat crop for forage in situations with low grain yield prospects is a major opportunity to increase profitability and help respond to climate variability in mixed farms in many areas of the Western Australian wheatbelt.

Keywords: APSIM, economics, feed quality, livestock production, modelling.

Animal Production Science 49(10) 797–806    doi:10.1071/AN09014
Submitted: 19 February 2009    Accepted: 18 May 2009    Published: 16 September 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (589 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010