|
Production traits and hatching of a Barred Rock 1 pure line, its feather sexable strains and their crosses
Ismail
Durmus
A
C
,
Huseyin
Goger
B
,
Sahnur
Demirtas
B
and
Sermin
Yurtogullari
B
A
Agricultural Faculty of Ordu University, Department of Animal Science, 52200 Ordu, Turkey.
B
Poultry Research Station, Sehit Cem Ersever Cad. No. 11, PO 47 06172 Yenimahalle-Ankara, Turkey.
C
Corresponding author. Email: durmusi19@hotmail.com
Animal Production Science
52(10)
945-948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN11357
Submitted: 28 October 2011 Accepted: 13 April 2012 Published:
3
July
2012
|  |
|
|
Abstract
The study was carried out to identify some production traits of the pure Barred Rock 1 (BR1) line and rapid × slow feathering line crosses derived from the BR1 pure line, in addition to F1 crosses of all these dam lines with Rhode Island Red 1 sire line. The BR1 line previously used a brown layer dam line for barred/non-barred day-old chick auto-sexing and synthetic slow and rapid wing feathering lines. Parent lines showed significant differences in sexual maturity and egg production (P < 0.01) and early embryonic mortality (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in weight at sexual maturity, average egg weight, hatchability of fertile eggs, hatchability of total eggs set, and middle and late embryonic mortalities. A significant difference was found among F1 crosses with respect to weight at sexual maturity (P < 0.05), but no significant difference (P > 0.05) could be determined for age at sexual maturity and egg production. Overall, rapid feathering hens had better production traits than slow feathering hens. The dual crossbred parent lines exhibited almost the same level of egg production traits compared with the pure line.
|
References
Bacon LD, Fadly AM, Critenden LB (1986
)
Absence of influence on immune competence by the sex-linked gene (m) determining slow-feathering in white leghorn chickens.
Avian Diseases
30, 751–760.
|
CrossRef |
CAS |
Boerjan M (2006
)
Chick vitality and uniformity.
International Hatchery Practise
20, 7–8.
Dunnington EA, Siegel PB, Gross WB (1986
)
Sex-linked feathering alleles (K, k
+) in chickens of diverse genetic backgrounds resistance to
Escherichia coli.
Avian Pathology
15, 139–148.
Durmus I, Goger H, Demirtas SE, Yurtogulları S (2010
)
Comparison rapid and slow feathering egg layers with respect to egg production and hatchability parameters.
Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
5, 66–71.
|
CrossRef |
CAS |
El-Rahman AA (2006
)
The effects of slow feathering gene (k) on productive performance of dandrawi chickens under subtropical conditions.
Egyptian Poultry Science Journal
26, 713–730.
Fotsa JC, Merat F, Bordas A (2001
)
Effect of slow (K) or rapid (k
+) feathering gene on body and feather growth and fatness according to ambient temperature in a leghorn x brown egg type cross.
Genetic Selection Evaluation
33, 659–670.
|
CrossRef |
CAS |
Khosravinia H (2009
)
Effect of the slow (k) or rapid (K’) feathering gene on carcass related traits of broiler chickens selected for breast and thigh weight.
Genetika
45, 112–118.
Lowe PC, Garwood VA (1981
)
Independent effects of K and k
+ alleles and maternal origin on mortality and performance of crossbred chickens.
Poultry Science
60, 1123–1126.
Thiagarajan M (1977
)
Relationship between feathering and growth mortality rate in white rock chicks.
Indian Journal of Poultry Science
12, 61–62.
Wilson HR, Jacop JP, Mather FB (2007) Method of sexing day-old chicks. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service, Fact Sheet PS-21 USA.
e-Alerts
Connect with us
