Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
TURNER REVIEW

Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful?

Eric S. Menges
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Archbold Biological Station, PO Box 2057, Lake Placid, FL 33862, USA. Email: emenges@archbold-station.org

Australian Journal of Botany 56(3) 187-196 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07173
Submitted: 17 September 2007  Accepted: 21 January 2008   Published: 21 May 2008

Abstract

Restorations are complex, often involving restoring ecological processes, vegetation structure, and species’ populations. One component of restorations is translocation of key species. Translocations (introductions, reintroductions, augmentations) are often necessary to recover species diversity and install key species. In this review, I consider the ways translocations have been evaluated at various stages during the process of restoration. Vital rates (survival, growth, fecundity) of propagules (seeds, transplants) are commonly used to evaluate initial success. Transplants usually provide greater initial success than do sown seeds. Beyond initial rates, completion of the life cycle through flowering, fruiting, dispersal and subsequent seedling recruitment is a key benchmark. Modelling population viability of translocated populations is a logical next step and can bring in many powerful inferential tools. Of factors affecting the success of translocations, genetic issues are paramount, as restorationists need to consider inbreeding depression, reproductive viability, local adaptation, and evolutionary potential of translocated populations. The success of translocations is also clearly context-dependent, with herbivory, disturbance, competition and other ecological factors important. Future translocations need to make better use of comparisons with reference populations, a long-term perspective on success and an experimental framework that can provide both practical and basic knowledge. Demographic data collection and analysis in restorations has great potential to elucidate causes of translocation failure and improve the prognosis of future restorations.


Acknowledgements

I thank Stacy Smith and Dorothy Mundell for assistance in organising literature on these topics. Thanks go to Tim Bell, Doria Gordon, Jennifer Ramp Neale and Carl Weekley for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Funding support from the National Science Foundation (DEB98-15370 and DEB-0233899) is gratefully acknowledged.


References


Aerts R, Negussie A, Maes W, November E, Hermy M, Muys B (2007) Restoration of dry afromontane forest using pioneer shrubs as nurse-plants for Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata. Restoration Ecology 15, 129–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Alley H, Affolter JM (2004) Experimental comparison of reintroduction methods for the endangered Echinacea laevigata (Boynton & Beadle) Blake. Natural Areas Journal 24, 345–350. open url image1

Bell TJ , Bowles ML , McEachern AK (2003) Projecting the success of plant population restoration with viability analysis. In ‘Population viability in plants’. (Eds CA Brigham, MW Schwartz) pp. 313–348. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Blignaut A, Milton SJ (2005) Effects of multispecies clumping on survival of three succulent plant species translocated into mine spoil in the succulent karoo desert, South Africa. Restoration Ecology 13, 15–19.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Blumenthal DM , Jordan NR , Svenson EL (2003) Weed control as a rationale for restoration: the example of tallgrass prairie. Conservation Ecology 7 1 6 [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art6

Bowles ML, McBride JL, Betz RF (1998) Management and restoration ecology of the federally threatened Mead’s milkweed, Ascepias meadii (Ascepiadaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85, 110–125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bradshaw AD (1987) Restoration: an acid test for ecology. In ‘Restoration ecology—a synthetic approach to ecological restoration’. (Eds WR Jordan, ME Gilpin, JD Aber) pp. 23–30. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Braham R, Murray C, Boyer M (2006) Mitigating impacts to Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii Sarg.): a case study of transplanting an endangered shrub. Castanea 71, 265–271.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Castro J, Zamora R, Hodar JA (2006) Restoring Quercus pyrenaica forests using pioneer shrubs as nurse plants. Applied Vegetation Science 9, 137–142.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Caswell H (2001) ‘Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation.’ 2nd edn. (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA)

Cox AC, Gordon DR, Slapcinsky JL, Seamon GS (2004) Understory restoration in longleaf pine sandhills. Natural Areas Journal 24, 4–14. open url image1

DeMauro MM (1993) Relationships of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7, 542–550.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

DeSteven D, Sharitz RR, Singer JH, Barton CD (2006) Testing a passive revegetation approach for restoring coastal plain depressional wetlands. Restoration Ecology 14, 452–460.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Galatowitsch SM, van der Valk AG (1996) The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 6, 102–112.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gennet S, Battles J, Allen-Diaz B, Bartolome JW (2004) Initial findings from experimental introductins reveal clues for restoring an endangered wetland grass (California). Ecological Restoration 22, 152–153. open url image1

Gordon DR (1994) Translocation of species into conservation areas: a key for natural resource managers. Natural Areas Journal 14, 31–37. open url image1

Gordon DR (1996) Experimental translocation of the endangered shrub, Apalachicola rosemary Conradina glabra. Biological Conservation 77, 19–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gordon DR, Rice KJ (1998) Patterns of differentiation in wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana): implications for restoration efforts. Restoration Ecology 6, 166–174.
Crossref |
open url image1

Gravuer K, von Wettberg E, Schmitt J (2005) Population differentiation and genetic variation inform translocation decisions for Liatris scariosa var. novae-angliae, a rare New England grassland perennial. Biological Conservation 124, 155–167.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–480.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Guerrant EO (1996) Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In ‘Restoring diversity. Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants’. (Eds DL Falk, CI Millar, M Olwell) pp. 127–155. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Guerrant EO, Kaye TN (2007) Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: common factors, questions and approaches. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 362–370.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hayworth DA, Bowles ML, Schaal BA, Shingleton KE (2001) Clonal population structure of the federally threatened Mead’s milkweed, as determined by RAPD analysis, and its conservation implications. Proceedings of the 17th North American Prairie Conference , 182–190. open url image1

Helenurm K, Parsons LS (1997) Genetic variation and the reintroduction of Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus to Sweetwater Marsh, California. Restoration Ecology 5, 236–244.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holl KD, Hayes GF (2006) Challenges to introducing and managing disturbance regimes for Holocarpha macradenia, an endangered annual grassland forb. Conservation Biology 20, 1121–1131.
PubMed |
open url image1

Holl KD, Loik ME, Lin EHV, Samuels IA (2000) Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8, 339–349.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Howald AM (1996) Translocation as a mitigation strategy: lessons from California. In ‘Restoring diversity. Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants’. (Eds DL Falk, CI Millar, M Olwell) pp. 127–155. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Howe HF (1994) Managing species diversity in tallgrass prairie: assumptions and implications. Conservation Biology 8, 691–704.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 147–155.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jusaitis M (2005) Translocation trials confirm specific factors affecting the establishment of three endangered plant species. Ecological Management & Restoration 6, 61–67.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jusaitis M, Polomka L, Sorensen B (2004) Habitat specificity, seed germination and experimental translocation of the endangered herb Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation 116, 251–266.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kaye TN, Cramer JR (2003) Direct seeding or transplanting: the cost of restoring populations of Kincaid’s lupine (Oregon). Ecological Restoration 21, 224–225. open url image1

Kephart SF (2004) Inbreeding and reintroduction: progeny success in rare Silene populations of varied density. Conservation Genetics 5, 49–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kindell CW, Winn AA, Miller TE (1996) The effects of surrounding vegetation and transplant age on the detection of local adaptation in the perennial grass Aristida stricta. Journal of Ecology 84, 745–754.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kindscher K, Tieszen LL (1998) Floristic and soil organic matter changes after five and thirty-five years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 6, 181–196.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kirchner F, Robert A, Colos B (2006) Modelling the dynamics of introduced populations in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa: a demo-genetic integration. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 1011–1021.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Krauss SL, Dixon B, Dixon KW (2002) Rapid genetic decline in a translocated population of the endangered plant Grevillea scapigera. Conservation Biology 16, 986–994.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1999) Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7, 42–50.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Effects of restoration on plant species richness and composition in Scandinavian semi-natural grasslands. Restoration Ecology 12, 318–326.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lombardo K, Fehmi JS, Rice KJ, Laca EA (2007) Nassella pulchra survival and water relations depend more on site productivity than on small-scale disturbance. Restoration Ecology 15, 177–178.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lubow BC (1996) Optimal translocation strategies for enhancing stochastic metapopulation viability. Ecological Applications 6, 1268–1280.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Martin LM, Wilsey BJ (2006) Assessing grassland restoration success: relative roles of seed additions and native ungulate activities. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 1098–1109.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Martin LM, Moloney KA, Milsey BJ (2005) An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 399–408. open url image1

Maschinski J, Duquesnel J (2007) Successful reintroductions of the endangered long-lived Sargent’s cherry palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii, in the Florida Keys. Biological Conservation 134, 122–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Maschinski J, Wright SJ (2006) Using ecological theory to plan restorations of the endangered beach jacquemontia (Convovulaceae) in fragmented habitats. Journal of Nature Conservation 14, 180–189.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Maschinski J, Baggs JE, Sacchi CF (2004) Seedling recruitment and survival of an endangered limestone endemic in its natural habitat and experimental reintroduction sites. American Journal of Botany 91, 689–698.
Crossref |
open url image1

Masters RA, Nissen SJ, Gaussoin RE, Beran DD, Stougaard RN (1996) Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technology 10, 392–403. open url image1

Maunder M (1992) Plant reintroduction: an overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 1, 51–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McGlaughlin M, Karoly K, Kaye T (2002) Genetic variation and its relationships to population size in reintroduced populations of pink sand verbena, Abronia umbellate subsp. Breviflora (Nyctaginaceae). Conservation Genetics 3, 411–420.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 285–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) ‘How local is local?’ A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13, 432–440.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Menges ES (2000) Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 51–56.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Menges ES, Gordon DR (1996) Three levels of monitoring intensity for rare plant species. Natural Areas Journal 16, 227–237. open url image1

Menges ES, Quintana-Ascencio PF (2004) Population viability with fire in Eryngium cuneifolium: deciphering a decade of demographic data. Ecological Monographs 74, 79–99.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mills LS, Doak DR (1999) Reliability of conservation actions based on elasticity analysis of matrix models. Conservation Biology 13, 815–829.
Crossref |
open url image1

Monks L, Coates D (2002) The translocation of two critically endangered Acadia species. Conservation Science West Australia 4, 54–61. open url image1

Montalvo AM, Ellstrand NC (2000) Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conservation Biology 14, 1034–1045.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Moran-Palma P, Snow AA (1997) The effect of interplant distance on mating success in federally threatened self-incompatible Hymenoxys herbacea = H. acaulis var. glabra (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 84, 233–238.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JW (2000) Reproductive success in reestablished versus natural populations of a threatened grassland daisy (Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides). Conservation Biology 14, 780–785.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morris WF , Doak DF (2002) ‘Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA)

Mottl LM, Mabry CM, Farrar DR (2006) Seven-year survival of perennial herbaceous transplants in temperate woodland restoration. Restoration Ecology 14, 330–338.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Muller S, Dutoit T, Alard D, Grevilliot F (1998) Restoration and rehabilitation of species-rich grassland ecosystems in France: a review. Restoration Ecology 6, 94–101.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Parsons LS, Zedler JB (1997) Factors affecting reestablishment of an endangered annual plant at a California salt marsh. Ecological Applications 7, 253–267.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pavlik BM (1996) Defining and measuring success. In ‘Restoring diversity. Strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants’. (Eds DL Falk, CI Millar, M Olwell) pp. 127–155. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Ramp JM, Collinge SK, Ranker TA (2006) Restoration genetics of the vernal pool endemic Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae). Conservation Genetics 7, 631–649.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rice KJ, Emery NC (2003) Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 469–478. open url image1

Robichaux RH, Friar EA, Mount DW (1997) Molecular genetic consequences of a population bottleneck associated with reintroduction of the Mauna Kea silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense ssp. sandwicense [Asteraceae]). Conservation Biology 11, 1140–1146.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rout T, Hauser CE, Possingham HP (2007) Minimise long-term loss or maximize short-term gain? Optimal translocation strategies for threatened species. Ecological Modelling 201, 67–74.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sanders S, McGraw JB (2005) Population differentiation of a threatened plant: variation in response to local environment and implications for restoration. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 132, 561–572.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sarrazin F, Barbault R (1996) Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 474–477.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scade A, Brundrett MC, Batty AL, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2006) Survival of transplanted terrestrial orchid seedlings in urban bushland habitats with high or low weed cover. Australian Journal of Botany 54, 383–389.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Smith BM, Diaz A, Winder L, Daniels R (2005) The effect of provenance on the establishment and performance of Lotus corniculatus L. in a re-creation environment. Biological Conservation 125, 37–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sweeney BW, Czapka SJ, Yerkes T (2002) Riparian forest restoration: increasing success by reducing plant competition and herbivory. Restoration Ecology 10, 392–400.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tobias DW, Holze N, Otte A (2003) The impact of site conditions and seed dispersal on restoration success in alluvial meadows. Applied Vegetation Science 6, 13–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tyndall RW, Groller PL (2006) Transplant survival, reproductive output, and population monitoring of Desmodium ochroleucum. Castanea 71, 329–332.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Van Stappen J (2004) The challenges of restoring an Apostle Island seascape community. Ecological Restoration 22, 144–145. open url image1

Vergeer P, Sonderen E, Ouborg JP (2004) Introduction strategies put to the test: local adapatation versus heterosis. Conservation Biology 18, 812–821.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wang J, Seliskar DM, Gallagher JL, League MT (2006) Blocking Phragmites australis reinvasion of restored marshes using plants selected from wild populations and tissue culture. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14, 539–547.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weekley CW , Menges ES (2005) Creation of a strategic plan and continuation of research on the federally-listed Lake Wales Ridge endemic Florida ziziphus (Ziziphus celata).
http://www.archbold-station.org/abs/publicationsPDF/Weekley-20051230-Ziziphus-StrategicPlanConcepOutline.pdf


Weekley CW, Kubisiak TL, Race TM (2002) Genetic impoverishment and cross-incompatiblity in remnant populations of Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae), a rare endemic plant of the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 2027–2046.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weekley CW , Clarke GL , Menges ES , Martin T (2007) Introduction of the endangered Florida ziziphus to Tiger Creek Preserve. Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service, Private Stewardship Grants Program. (Archibald Biological Station, Lake Placid, Florida.)

Westbury DB, Davies A, Woodcock BA, Dunnett NP (2006) Seeds of change: the value of using Rhinanthus minor in grassland restoration. Journal of Vegetation Science 17, 435–446.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

White PS, Walker JL (1997) Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5, 338–349.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilkins S, Keith DA, Adam P (2003) Measuring success: evaluating the restoration of a grassy eucalypt woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia. Restoration Ecology 11, 489–503.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson SD, Bakker JD, Christian JM, Li X, Ambrose LG, Waddington J (2004) Semiarid old-field restoration: is neighbor control needed? Ecological Applications 14, 476–484.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wolf CM, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple SA (1996) Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conservation Biology 10, 1142–1154.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Young TP, Peterson DA, Clary JJ (2005) The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8, 662–673.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zedler JB, Callaway JC (1999) Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology 7, 69–73.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1