CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Botany   
Australian Journal of Botany
Journal Banner
  Southern Hemisphere Botanical Ecosystems
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Turner Review Series
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

red arrow PrometheusWiki
blank image
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 36(3)

A Difference in Pollen Size Between the Male and Hermaphrodite Flowers of Two Species of Apiaceae

MJ Mckone and CJ Webb

Australian Journal of Botany 36(3) 331 - 337
Published: 1988


The size of pollen grains from male and hermaphrodite flowers was compared in two species, Lignocarpa diversifolia (Cheeseman) J . Wyndham Dawson and Gingidia harveyana (F. Muell.) J . Wyndham Dawson (Apiaceae). In L. diversifolia, pollen grains from hermaphrodite flowers were on average 20% greater in volume than the grains from male flowers; in G. harveyana, pollen grains from hermaphrodite flowers were on average 13% greater in volume than grains from male flowers. There was also considerable variation in pollen size among flowers of each type, both within and among plants of both species. Conditions during pollen development could be important; the early arrest of development of the gynoecium in male flowers could have a general effect on the flower and result in smaller pollen. Alternatively, the size difference could be adaptive if pollen from hermaphrodite flowers fertilises flowers with longer styles than does the pollen from male flowers. The size difference also could result from selection for an increased number of pollen grains in male flowers if there is a trade off between pollen size and number.

Full text doi:10.1071/BT9880331

© CSIRO 1988

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (350 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2014