Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Regional differences in tree–crop competition due to soil, climate and management

Neil I. Huth A B D , Michael J. Robertson C and Perry L. Poulton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit (APSRU), PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

B The Ecology Centre, School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

C CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: neil.huth@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 61(9) 763-770 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP09254
Submitted: 1 September 2009  Accepted: 22 July 2010   Published: 9 September 2010

Abstract

Large areas of trees are being planted in Australian agricultural lands for a range of environmental, ecological and economic reasons. In the medium to low rainfall zones, these plantings can negatively impact upon adjacent agricultural production through competition for soil moisture. The nature of the tree–crop competition zone and the means of managing it have been studied in the main southern cropping zones. However, the differences in soil, climate and agronomic systems in Australia’s northern dryland cropping zones could lead to differences in the competition processes and the management options needed to minimise them. In this study, the competition for soil moisture and resultant impacts on crop production were studied for a Eucalyptus argophloia windbreak on a farm near Warra, Queensland (26.93°S, 150.93°E). The results indicate well defined inner and outer competition zones, the extents of which agree with those found elsewhere in Australia and overseas. However, while the extent of the competition is comparable with other regions, local agronomic practices developed for variable climatic conditions and deep clay soils allow trees to extract soil water stored during fallow periods resulting in relatively higher production losses.

Additional keywords: agroforestry, cotton, Eucalyptus argophloia, germination failure, wheat.


Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jeff and Marilyn Bidstrup for allowing us to conduct this research on their farm. Robert Brown, Jeremy Whish, Zvi Hochman, Lindsay Bell, Hugh Possingham and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript.


References


Albertson T , Eckersley P , Blennerhassett S , Moore R , Hingston R (2000) Blue gum timberbelt design for alley farming. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No. 07/192, Canberra.

Bange MP, Carberry PS, Marshall J, Milroy SP (2005) Row configuration as a tool for managing rain-fed cotton systems: review and simulation analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 65–77.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bennell MR, Verbyla AP (2008) Quantifying the response of crops to shelter in the agricultural regions of South Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 950–957.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Carberry P , Huth N , Poulton P , Brennan L (2007) Quantifying the tradeoff between tree and crop productivity on farms. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No. 07/192, Canberra.

Cook PG , Williams BG (1998) Electromagnetic induction techniques. In ‘Studies in catchment hydrology. The basics of recharge and discharge’. (Eds L Zhang, G Walker) (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Dalgliesh NP , Foale MA (1998) ‘Soil matters – monitoring soil water and nitrogen in dryland farming.’ (Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit: Toowoomba, Qld)

Ellis T, Hatton T, Nuberg I (2005) An ecological optimality approach for predicting deep drainage from tree belts of alley farms in water-limited environments. Agricultural Water Management 75, 92–116.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Freebairn DM , Littleboy M , Smith GD , Coughlan KJ (1991) Optimising soil surface management in response to climatic risk. In ‘Climatic risk in crop production: models and management in the semiarid tropics and subtropics’. (Eds RC Muchow, JA Bellamy) pp. 283–305. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Greb BW, Black AL (1961) Effects of windbreak plantings on adjacent crops. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 16, 223–227. open url image1

Hall DJM, Sudmeyer RA, McLernon CK, Short RJ (2002) Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 3. Soil water and hydrology. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 729–738.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Harris PS , Biggs AJW , Coutts AJ (Eds) (1999) Field manual. In ‘Central Darling Downs Land Management Manual’. (Department of Natural Resources: Qld)

Hatton TJ, Ruprecht J, George RJ (2003) Preclearing hydrology of the Western Australia wheatbelt: target for the future? Plant and Soil 257, 341–356.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Huth NI, Carberry PS, Poulton PL, Brennan LE, Keating BA (2002) A framework for simulating agroforestry options for the low rainfall areas of Australia using APSIM. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 171–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Huth NI, Poulton PL (2007) An electromagnetic induction method for monitoring variation in soil moisture in agroforestry systems. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 63–72.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Isbell RF (1996) The Australian Soil Classification. In ‘Australian soil and land survey handbook’. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Jones HR, Sudmeyer RA (2002) Economic assessment of windbreaks on the south-eastern coast of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 751–761.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kidanu S, Mamo T, Stroosnijder L (2004) Eucalyptus–wheat interaction on Ethiopian nitosols. Agricultural Systems 80, 151–170.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kidanu S, Mamo T, Stroosnijder L (2005) Biomass production of Eucalyptus boundary plantations and their effect on crop productivity on Ethiopian highland vertisols. Agroforestry Systems 63, 281–290.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Knight A, Blott K, Portelli M, Hignett C (2002) Use of tree and shrub belts to control leakage in three dryland cropping environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 571–586.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 22–23, 165–190.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lefroy EC, Stirzaker RJ, Pate JS (2001) The influence of tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus Link) trees on the water balance of an alley cropping system on deep sand in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 235–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Oliver YM, Lefroy EC, Stirzaker R, Davies CL (2005) Deep-drainage control and yield: the trade-off between trees and crops in agroforestry systems in the medium to low rainfall areas of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1011–1026.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stirzaker RJ, Cook FJ, Knight JH (1999) Where to plant trees on cropping land for control of dryland salinity: some approximate solutions. Agricultural Water Management 39, 115–133.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer R (2002) Tree root morphology in alley systems. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No. 02/024, Canberra.

Sudmeyer R, Flugge F (2005) The economics of managing tree–crop competition in windbreak and alley systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1403–1414.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Adams MA, Eastham J, Scott PR, Hawkins W, Rowland IC (2002a) Broadacre crop yield in the lee of windbreaks in the medium and low rainfall areas of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 739–750.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Hall DJM, Eastham J, Adams MA (2002b) The tree–crop interface: the effects of root pruning in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 763–772.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Scott PR (2002) Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 2. Crop growth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 717–727.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Simons JA (2008) Eucalyptus globulus agroforestry on deep sands on the southeast coast of Western Australia: the promise and the reality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 127, 73–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Unkovich M, Blott K, Knight A, Mock I, Rab A, Portelli M (2003) Water use, competition, and crop production in low rainfall, alley farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 751–762.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whish J, Butler G, Castor M, Cawthray S, Broad I, Carberry P, Hammer G, McLean G, Routley R, Yeates S (2005) Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 11–23.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whish JPM, Castor P, Carberry PS (2007) Managing production constraints to the reliability of chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) within marginal areas of the northern grains region of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 396–405.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Woodall GS, Ward BH (2002) Soil water relations, crop production and root pruning of a belt of trees. Agricultural Water Management 53, 153–169.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1