Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH FRONT (Open Access)

Acute stress induced by the preslaughter use of electric prodders causes tougher beef meat

R. D. Warner A B E , D. M. Ferguson C , J. J. Cottrell B and B. W. Knee D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality.

B Department of Primary Industries, 600 Sneydes Road, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.

C CSIRO Livestock Industries, F.D. McMaster Laboratory, Chiswick, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

D Department of Primary Industries, Mount Napier Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: robyn.warner@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(7) 782-788 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05155
Submitted: 10 June 2005  Accepted: 28 March 2007   Published: 2 July 2007

Abstract

Adrenergic activation and hormone release preslaughter is an inevitable outcome of the systems used to move cattle to slaughter. The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effects of acute preslaughter stress in beef cattle on postmortem muscle metabolism and the meat quality, including consumer-assessed eating quality. Eighty-four cattle were used on three separate days, with ‘mobs’ of four cattle allocated to either a ‘control’ (no electric goads used preslaughter) or a ‘stress’ (six prods given with an electric goad over 5–10 min) treatment at 15 min preslaughter. Cattle undergoing the ‘stress’ treatment had higher plasma lactate at slaughter. The prerigor pH and temperature, ultimate pH and temperature at rigor of the longissimus thoracis muscle were similar between treatments (P > 0.05 for all). The water-holding capacity of the longissimus lumborum was reduced by the ‘stress’ treatment, as indicated by higher levels of water lost during suspension (drip loss), storage (purge) for 21 days and cooking (cooking loss at 1 day postslaughter) (P < 0.05 for all). ‘Stress’ cattle produced longissimus lumborum muscle with similar sarcomere lengths and Warner–Bratzler shear force at 2, 6 and 21 days, compared to ‘control’ cattle (P < 0.05 for all). The longissimus lumborum muscle of cattle undergoing the ‘stress’ treatment was rated less tender, less juicy, with a less acceptable flavour, a lower ‘liking’ and a lower MQ4 score (P < 0.05 for all). The ‘bloomed’ surface colour (CIE L*, a*, b*) of the longissimus lumborum muscle at 2, 6 and 21 days postslaughter was similar between the ‘stress’ and ‘control’ treatments (P > 0.05 for all). In conclusion, cattle subjected to acute preslaughter stress using electric goads produced meat which the consumer rated as tougher with inferior quality. The inferior quality induced by the acute stress treatment was associated with reduced water-holding capacity but was independent of muscle pH and temperature.


Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Cooperative Research Centre for Beef, Meat Standards Australia and Meat and Livestock Australia. We thank Matthew Kerr, Peter Walker and Paul Weston for their technical assistance. The biometrical input of Kym Butler is gratefully acknowledged. The study could not have occurred without the cattle provided by Coles Supermarkets through Charlton Feedlot and Kaladbro feedlot and the assistance provided by staff at G and K O’Connor. In particular, the assistance of John Skelton of Coles Supermarkets, Australia, David McKibbin of Coles Supermarkets, Australia and Hamish MacKinnon of Kaladbro is appreciated. We also thank Lotte Nielsen, a student from the Swedish Agricultural University in Uppsala, Sweden, for her input into one of the replicates for the study.


References


Bickerstaffe R , Morton JD , Daly CC , Keeley GM (1996) Interaction of preslaughter stress and low voltage electrical stimulation on muscle proteolytic enzymes and meat tenderness in lambs. In ‘International congress of meat science and technology, Lillehammer, Norway. Vol. 42’. 420–421.

Bond JJ, Warner RD (2007) Effects of antemortem exercise on water holding capacity of lamb Longissimus thoracis et lumborum: ion distribution and protein proteolysis post mortem. Meat Science 75, 406–414.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bond JJ, Can LA, Warner RD (2004) The effect of exercise stress, adrenaline injection and electrical stimulation on changes in quality attributes and proteins in Semimembranosus muscle of lamb. Meat Science 68, 469–477.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthose WR (1971) Effect of ultimate pH upon the water-holding capacity and tenderness of mutton. Journal of Food Science 37, 358–360. open url image1

Brown SN, Warriss PD, Nute GR, Edwards JE, Knowles TG (1998) Meat quality in pigs subjected to minimal preslaughter stress. Meat Science 49, 257–265.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burrow HM, Seifert GW, Corbet NJ (1988) A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle. Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 154–157. open url image1

Channon HA, Payne A, Warner RD (2000) Halothane genotype, preslaughter handling and stunning method all influence pork quality. Meat Science 56, 291–299.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Daly CC , Simmons NJ , Devine CE (1995) An interaction between preslaughter stress and electrical stimulation on tenderness of lamb. In ‘International congress of meat science and technology, San Antonio, Texas. Vol. 48’. 226–227.

Devine CE, Graafhuis AE, Muir PD, Chrystall BB (1993) The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Science 35, 63–77.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dransfeld E (1994) Modelling post mortem tenderisation. V. Inactivation of calpains. Meat Science 37, 391–409.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

D’Souza DN, Warner RD, Leury BJ, Dunshea FR (1998a) The effect of dietary magnesium aspartate supplementation on pork quality. Journal of Animal Science 76, 104–109.
PubMed |
open url image1

D’Souza DN, Dunshea FR, Warner RD, Leury BJ (1998b) The effect of handling pre-slaughter and carcass processing rate post-slaughter on pork quality. Meat Science 50, 429–437.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

D’Souza DN, Dunshea FR, Leury BJ, Warner RD (1999) Effect of mixing boars during lairage and preslaughter handling on pork quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 109–113.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ferguson DM , Thompson JM , Polkinghorne R (1999) Meat Standards Australia. A ‘PACCP’ based beef grading scheme for consumers. 3. PACCP requirements which apply to carcass processing. In ‘International congress of meat science and technology, Yokohama, Japan. Vol. 45’. pp. 18–19.

Grandin T (1998) Handling and welfare of livestock in slaughter plants. In ‘Livestock handling and transport’. (Ed. T Grandin) pp. 289–311. (CAB International: Oxon, UK)

Gregory NG (1998) ‘Animal welfare and meat science.’ (CAB International: Oxon, UK)

Honikel KO, Kim CJ, Hamm R (1986) Sarcomere shortening of prerigor muscles and its influence on drip loss. Meat Science 16, 267–282.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jeremiah LE, Newman JA, Tong AKW, Gibson LL (1988) The effects of castration, preslaughter stress and zeranol implants on beef. 2. Cooking properties and flavor of loin steaks from bovine males. Meat Science 22, 103–121.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Klont RE, Lambooy E (1995) Effects of preslaughter muscle exercise on muscle metabolism and meat quality studied in anesthetized pigs of different halothane genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 73, 108–117.
PubMed |
open url image1

Koohmaraie M (1994) Muscle proteinases and meat ageing. Meat Science 36, 93–104.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lewis PK, Brown CJ, Heck MC (1977) Effect of pre slaughter treatments on certain chemical and physical characterstics of certain beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science 20, 433–438. open url image1

Moller AJ, Vestergaard T (1986) Effects of altered carcass suspension during rigor mortis on tenderness of pork loin. Meat Science 18, 77–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Noll F (1985) L+lactate determination. In ‘Methods of enzymatic analysis’. (Ed. HU Bergmeyer) pp. 583–588. (VCH Verlagsgesellschaft: Weinheim, Germany)

Offer G (1991) Modelling of the formation of pale, soft and exudative meat: Effects of chilling regime and rate and extent of glycolysis. Meat Science 30, 157–184.
Crossref |
open url image1

O’Halloran GR, Troy DJ, Buckley DJ (1997) The relationship between early postmortem pH and the tenderisation of beef muscles. Meat Science 45, 239–251.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Polkinghorne R , Watson R , Porter M , Scott J , Thompson JM (1999) Meat Standards Australia. A ‘PACCP’ based grading scheme for consumers. 1. The use of consumer scores to set grade standards. In ‘Proceedings 45th international congress of meat science and technology, Yokohama, Japan’. pp. 14–15.

Ruddick JE, Richards JF (1975) Comparison of sarcomere length measurement of cooked chicken pectoralis muscle by laser diffraction and oil immersion microscopy. Journal of Food Science 40, 500–501.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sensky PL, Parr T, Bardsley RG, Buttery PJ (1996) The relationship between plasma epinephrine concentration and the activity of the calpain enzyme system in porcine longissimus muscle. Journal of Animal Science 74, 380–387.
PubMed |
open url image1

Shaw FD, Tume RK (1992) The assessment of preslaughter and slaughter treatments of livestock by measurement of plasma constituents – a review of recent work. Meat Science 32, 311–329.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stoier S, Aaslyng MD, Olsen EV, Henckel P (2001) The effect of stress during lairage and stunning on muscle metabolism and drip loss in Danish pork. Meat Science 59, 127–131.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tarrant PV (1989a) Animal behaviour and environment in the dark-cutting condition in beef – a review. Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology 13, 1–21. open url image1

Tarrant PV (1989b) The effect of handling, transport, slaughter and chilling on meat quality and yield of pigs. Manipulating Pig Production 3, 1–25. open url image1

Tarrant PV, Mothersill C (1977) Glycolysis and associated changes in beef carcasses. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 739–749.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Greaser ML (1997) Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Science 45(3), 339–352.
Crossref |
open url image1

Warner RD , Bond JJ , Kerr MG (2000) Meat quality traits in lamb M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum: the effect of preslaughter stress and electrical stimulation. In ‘International congress of meat science and technology. Vol. 46’. pp. 154–155.

Warner RD, Channon HA, Hofmeyr CD, Can AL, Cottrell JJ, Bond JJ, Greaser ML, Kauffman RG (2001) Water-holding capacity (WHC) of pork: preslaughter stress and protein denaturation. Proceedings of the Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference 54, 148–154. open url image1

Warriss PD (1990) The handling of cattle preslaughter and its effects on carcass and meat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28, 171–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Warriss PD, Kerstin SC, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ (1984) The time required for recovery from mixing stress in young bulls and the prevention of dark cutting meat. Meat Science 10, 53–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Warriss PD, Brown SN, Nute GR, Knowles TG, Edwards JE, Perry AM, Johnson SP (1995) Potential interactions between the effects of preslaughter stress and postmortem electrical stimulation of the carcasses on meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 41, 55–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wulf DM, Emnett RS, Leheska JM, Moeller SJ (2002) Relationships among glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1895–1903.
PubMed |
open url image1