CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Animal Production Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Sites of Interest
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Lessons learnt about effectively applying participatory action research: a case study from the New South Wales dairy industry

M. A. Friend A D, A. M. Dunn B and J. Jennings C

A EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Industry & Investment NSW and Charles Sturt University), Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
B School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
C School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney – Hawkesbury, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: mfriend@csu.edu.au


Abstract

A participatory action research (PAR) project was implemented in the New South Wales dairy industry. Six regional dairy groups were given funding to investigate issues relating to management of the feedbase. Facilitated meetings in the regions identified limitations to local systems and how these limitations could be addressed. Local groups then implemented research of relevance to their systems. Activities varied but groups were guided by the principles of PAR. Regional groups consisted of farmers, government extension and/or research staff, processors and other stakeholders. A leadership team, consisting of representatives from each of the regional groups and other stakeholders, was formed to administer the project and assist groups in using the PAR approach. Evaluation of the project indicated high levels of participation in all regions and a strong sense of ownership of the project and/or project work. The most commonly mentioned outcome in the groups was what they learned as a result of involvement. The project and its evaluation are discussed in relation to PAR principles, the outcomes from the approach, and lessons learnt for improving the success of PAR.

Animal Production Science 49(11) 1007–1014    doi:10.1071/EA08168
Submitted: 19 May 2008    Accepted: 26 June 2009    Published: 14 October 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (128 KB) $25
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010