CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
http://www.aseg.org.au
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Submit Article
blank image
Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

red arrow Call for Papers
blank image
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

red arrow Preview
blank image
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

red arrow ASEG Extended Abstracts
blank image
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG´s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 31(2)

Can amplitudes resolve ambiguities in refraction inversion?

D. Palmer

Exploration Geophysics 31(2) 304 - 309
Published: 2000

Abstract

The inversion of seismic refraction data with model-based methods is inherently ambiguous, and artefacts, which are geologically plausible and significant, can be introduced by the algorithms used to generate the starting model. In many cases, the minimum variance criterion of the generalized reciprocal method (GRM) can resolve whether lateral variations in the refractor wavespeeds are genuine, or whether they are artefacts of the inversion algorithm. As an additional constraint, this paper demonstrates that any genuine lateral changes in refractor wavespeed should also have an associated amplitude expression. Amplitudes are not commonly used in most seismic refraction studies, mainly because the very large geometric spreading component masks any variations related to geology. The amplitude decay is usually much more rapid than the commonly assumed inverse distance squared function, which only applies after the signal has travelled several wavelengths in the refractor. This study demonstrates that the refraction time section generated through the convolution of forward and reverse refraction traces, shows the same structure on the refracting interface, in units of time, as would be produced by the conventional reciprocal method (CRM) or the GRM. The traveltimes, which are contained within the phase spectra, are added with convolution. The amplitude spectra are multiplied, which is sufficient both to compensate for the large geometric effects and to facilitate convenient recognition of amplitude variations related to changes in refractor wavespeed. Convolution emphasises these amplitude variations through the squaring of the head coefficients and the convenient inclusion of transmission losses. In general, the higher the refractor wavespeed and/or density, the lower the amplitude. The results are applicable to the search for massive sulphide orebodies under electrically conductive regoliths, where other traditional exploration techniques, such as electrical and electromagnetic methods, may not be fully effective. These targets would be characterised by an increase in the thickness of the regolith and a decrease in amplitude caused by an increase in the density.



Full text doi:10.1071/EG00304

© ASEG 2000

blank image >
 
PDF (193 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013