CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
http://www.aseg.org.au
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Submit Article
blank image
Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

red arrow Call for Papers
blank image
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

red arrow Preview
blank image
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

red arrow ASEG Extended Abstracts
blank image
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG´s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 43(4)

New methods for interpretation of magnetic vector and gradient tensor data I: eigenvector analysis and the normalised source strength

David A. Clark

CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, and CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, PO Box 218, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia. Email: David.Clark@csiro.au

Exploration Geophysics 43(4) 267-282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EG12020
Submitted: 6 April 2012  Accepted: 3 August 2012   Published: 27 September 2012


 
PDF (1.1 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Acquisition of magnetic gradient tensor data is likely to become routine in the near future. New methods for inverting gradient tensor surveys to obtain source parameters have been developed for several elementary, but useful, models. These include point dipole (sphere), vertical line of dipoles (narrow vertical pipe), line of dipoles (horizontal cylinder), thin dipping sheet, and contact models. A key simplification is the use of eigenvalues and associated eigenvectors of the tensor. The normalised source strength (NSS), calculated from the eigenvalues, is a particularly useful rotational invariant that peaks directly over 3D compact sources, 2D compact sources, thin sheets and contacts, and is independent of magnetisation direction. In combination the NSS and its vector gradient determine source locations uniquely. NSS analysis can be extended to other useful models, such as vertical pipes, by calculating eigenvalues of the vertical derivative of the gradient tensor. Inversion based on the vector gradient of the NSS over the Tallawang magnetite deposit obtained good agreement between the inferred geometry of the tabular magnetite skarn body and drill hole intersections. Besides the geological applications, the algorithms for the dipole model are readily applicable to the detection, location and characterisation (DLC) of magnetic objects, such as naval mines, unexploded ordnance, shipwrecks, archaeological artefacts, and buried drums.

Key words: dipole localisation, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, magnetic field vector, magnetic gradient tensor, magnetisation, normalised source strength.


References

Anton, H., and Rorres, C., 2000, Elementary linear algebra: applications version, 8th edition: Wiley.

Beiki, M, and Pedersen, L. B., 2010, Eigenvector analysis of gravity gradient tensor to locate geologic bodies: Geophysics, 75, I37–I49
CrossRef |

Beiki, M., Pedersen, L. B., and Nazi, H., 2011, Interpretation of aeromagnetic data using eigenvector analysis of pseudogravity gradient tensor: Geophysics, 76, L1–L10
CrossRef |

Beiki, M., Clark, D. A., Austin, J. R., and Foss, C. A., 2012, Estimating source location using normalized magnetic source strength calculated from magnetic gradient tensor data: Geophysics, ,

Blakely, R. J., 1996, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.

Bracken, R. E., and Brown, P. J., 2006, Concepts and procedures required for successful reduction of tensor magnetic gradiometer data obtained from an unexploded ordnance detection demonstration at Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona, US: Geological Survey Open-File Report (United States), 2006–1027, 53 pp.

Christensen, A., and Rajagopalan, S., 2000, The magnetic vector and gradient tensor in mineral and oil exploration: Preview, 84, 77

Chwala, A., Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Fritzsch, L., Shulz, M., Rompel, A., Polome, L., Meyer, M., and Meyer, H. G., 2012, Full tensor SQUID gradiometer for airborne exploration. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 26–29 February 2012 - Brisbane, Australia, CD-ROM, 4 pp.

Clark, D. A., 2010, Method and apparatus for detection using magnetic gradient tensor. US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2010/0211337 Al, Pub. date: Aug. 19, 2010.

Clark, D. A., 2012a, New methods for interpretation of magnetic gradient tensor data. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 26–29 February 2012 - Brisbane, Australia, CD-ROM, 11 pp.

Clark, D. A., 2012b, Interpretation of the magnetic gradient tensor and normalized source strength applied to the Tallawang magnetite skarn deposit, New South Wales, Australia. Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual Meeting, Las Vegas.

Clark, D. A., Schmidt, P. W., Coward, D. A., and Huddleston, M. P., 1998, Remote determination of magnetic properties and improved drill targeting of magnetic anomaly sources by Differential Vector Magnetometry (DVM): Exploration Geophysics, 29, 312–319
CrossRef |

Clark, D. A., Young, J. A., and Schmidt, P. W., 2009, Magnetic tensor gradiometry in the marine environment: correction of electric and magnetic field and gradient measurements in a conductive medium and improved methods for magnetic target location using the magnetic gradient tensor. MARELEC (Marine Electromagnetics) Conference, July 2009, Stockholm, CD-ROM, 10 pp.

Clem, T. R., Froelich, M. C., Overway, D. J., Purpura, J. W., Wiegert, R. F., Koch, R. H., Lathrop, D. K., Rozen, J., Eraker, J. H., and Schmidt, J. M., 1997, Advances in sensor development and demonstration of superconducting gradiometers for mobile operation: IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 7, 3287–3293
CrossRef |

Clem, T. R., Overway, D. J., Purpura, J. W., Bono, J. T., Koch, R. H., Rozen, J., Keeefe, G. A., Willen, S., and Mohling, R. A., 2001, High-Tc SQUID gradiometer for mobile magnetic anomaly detection: IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 11, 871–875
CrossRef |

Emerson, D. W., Clark, D. A., and Saul, S. J., 1985, Magnetic exploration models incorporating remanence, demagnetization and anisotropy: HP 41C handheld computer algorithms: Exploration Geophysics, 16, 1–122
CrossRef |

Fitzgerald, D., and Holstein, H., 2006, Innovative data processing methods for gradient airborne geophysical data sets: The Leading Edge, 25, 87–94
CrossRef |

Fitzgerald, D., Argast, D., Paterson, R., and Holstein, H., 2009, Full tensor magnetic gradiometery processing and interpretation developments. 11th SAGA Technical Meeting and Exhibition, 16–18 September 2009, Swaziland, 265–272.

Fitzgerald, D., Argast, D., Paterson, R., and Holstein, H., 2010, Progress on interpreting dykes from full tensor magnetic gradiometry: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 29, 1162–1166
CrossRef |

Foss, C., 2006, The improvements in source resolution that can be expected from inversion of magnetic field tensor data: The Leading Edge, 25, 81–84
CrossRef |

Heath, P., 2007, Analysis of potential field gradient data: forward modelling, inversion and near-surface exploration: Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.

Holstein, H., Fitzgerald, D., Willis, C. P., and Foss, C., 2011, Magnetic gradient tensor eigenanalysis for dyke location. 73rd EAEG Conference and Exhibition, 23–27 May 2011, Vienna.

Humphrey, K. P., Horton, T. J., and Keene, M. N., 2005, Detection of mobile targets from a moving platform using an actively shielded, adaptively balanced SQUID gradiometer: IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 15, 753–756
CrossRef |

Ku, C. C., and Sharp, J. A., 1983, Werner deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt’s inverse modelling: Geophysics, 48, 754–774

Leslie, K. E., Bick, M., Binks, R. A., Tilbrook, D. L., Clark, D. A., Schmidt, P. W., Cusack, P. J., Thorn, R. G., Blay, K. R., and Sullivan, P. R., 2005, Performance issues for a spinning gradiometer. 10th International Superconductive Electronics Conference (ISEC 2005), Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 2005. ISEC Extended Abstracts (Univ. Twente) O-O.01.

Leslie, K. E., Blay, K., Clark, D., Schmidt, P., Tilbrook, D., Bick, M., and Foley, C., 2007, Helicopter trial of magnetic tensor gradiometer. ASEG 19th International Conference, December 2007, Perth, Western Australia, CD-ROM, 4 pp.

Li, X., 2006, Understanding the 3D analytic signal amplitude: Geophysics, 71, L13–L16

Lima, E. A., Irimia, A., and Wikswo, J. P., 2006, The magnetic inverse problem, in J. Clarke and A.I. Braginski, eds., The SQUID Handbook, Vol. II Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems: Wiley-VCH, pp. 139–267.

McRae, W., Veryaskin, A. V., Greager, D., Ju, L., Blair, D., Chin, E.-J., Dumas, J.-C., and Lee, B., 2004, String magnetic gradiometer system: recent airborne trials: 74th Ann. Mtg. Soc. Explor. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts 23, 790–793.

Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 501–517

Nara, T., Suzuki, S., and Ando, S., 2006, A closed-form formula for magnetic dipole localization by measurement of its magnetic field and spatial gradients: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42, 3291–3293
CrossRef |

Pedersen, L. B., and Rasmussen, T. M., 1990, The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies: some implications on data collection and data processing of maps: Geophysics, 55, 1558–1566

Schmidt, P. W., 2006, Inversion using Euler deconvolution of the magnetic gradient tensor. Australian Earth Sciences Congress, Melbourne, Australia, Extended Abstracts, 3 pp.

Schmidt, P. W., and Clark, D. A., 2006, The magnetic gradient tensor: its properties and uses in source characterization: The Leading Edge, 25, 75–78
CrossRef |

Schmidt, P., Clark, D., Leslie, K., Bick, M., Tilbrook, D., and Foley, C., 2004, GETMAG – A SQUID magnetic tensor gradiometer for mineral and oil exploration: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 297–305
CrossRef |

Stolz, R., Fritzsch, L., and Meyer, H.-G., 1999, LTS SQUID sensor with a new configuration: Superconductor Science and Technology, 12, 806–808
CrossRef | CAS |

Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Schulz, M., Chwala, A., Fritzsch, L., Meyer, H.-G., and Köstlin, E. O., 2006a, Magnetic full-tensor SQUID gradiometer system for geophysical applications: The Leading Edge, 25, 178–180
CrossRef |

Stolz, R., Chwala, A., Zakosarenko, V., Schulz, M., Fritzsch, L., and Meyer, H.-G., 2006b, SQUID technology for geophysical exploration: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 25, 894–898
CrossRef |

Sunderland, A., Golden, H., McRae, W., Veryaskin, A., Ju, L., and Blair, D., 2009, Results from a novel direct magnetic gradiometer: Exploration Geophysics, 40, 222–226
CrossRef |

Tilbrook, D. L., 2004, The design of a new concept HTSC axial gradiometer: Physica C: Superconductivity, 407, 1–9
CrossRef | CAS |

Tilbrook, D. L., Clark, D. A., and Blay, K. R., 2006, Data extraction and calibration of a superconducting rotating magnetic tensor gradiometer. Applied Superconductivity Conference, 27 August – 1 September 2006, Seattle, USA.

Veryaskin, A. V., 2001, Magnetic gradiometry: a new method for magnetic gradient measurement: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 91, 233–235
CrossRef |

Wiegert R. Oeschger J. Tuovila E. 2007 Demonstration of a novel man-portable magnetic STAR technology for real time localization of unexploded ordnance : Proceedings of MTS/IEEE Oceans 2007 1 7 10.1109/OCEANS.2007.4449229

Wilson, H., 1985, Analysis of the magnetic gradient tensor. Defence Research Establishment Pacific, Canada, Technical Memorandum, 85–13, 47.

Wynn, W. M., 1995, Magnetic dipole localization using the gradient rate tensor measured by a five-axis magnetic gradiometer with known velocity: Proceedings of the Society for Photo-Instrumentation Engineers, 2496, 357–367
CrossRef |

Wynn, W. M., 1997, Magnetic dipole localization with a gradiometer: obtaining unique solutions. IGARSS ’97, Remote Sensing – A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 3–8 August 1997: IEEE International, 4, 1483–1485
CrossRef |

Wynn, W. M., 1999, Detection, localization, and characterization of static magnetic-dipole sources, in C. E. Baum, ed., Detection and identification of visually obscured targets: Taylor & Francis, pp. 337–374.

Wynn, W. M., Frahm, C. P., Carroll, P. J., Clark, R. H., Wellhoner, J., and Wynn, M. J., 1975, Advanced super-conducting gradiometer/magnetometer arrays and a novel signal processing technique: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 11, 701–707
CrossRef |

Young, J. A., Keenan, S. T., Clark, D. A., Leslie, K. E., Sullivan, P., Fairman, P., Williams, C., Foley, C. P., and Billings, S. D., 2010, A superconducting magnetic tensor gradiometer for underwater UXO detection. 21st International Geophysical Conference & Exhibition (ASEG-PESA 2010), Sydney (extended abstract), CD-ROM, 4 pp.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013