Competitive ligand exchange reveals time dependant changes in the reactivity of Hg–dissolved organic matter complexes

Open Access Article

Next >>

Contents Vol 9(6)

doi:10.1071/EN12096

Environmental problems - Chemical approaches

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Boards

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Research Fronts

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Notice to Authors

	Submit Article

	Open Access



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Competitive ligand exchange reveals time dependant changes in the reactivity of Hg–dissolved organic matter complexes

Carrie L. Miller ^A ^B, Liyuan Liang ^A and Baohua Gu ^A

^A Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
^B Corresponding author. Email: millercl@ornl.gov

Environmental Chemistry 9(6) 495-501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN12096
Submitted: 13 July 2012 Accepted: 26 October 2012 Published: 11 December 2012





	Full Text



	PDF (239 KB)



	Supplementary Material



	Export Citation

Print

Environmental context. Mercury, a globally important pollutant, undergoes transformations in the environment to form methylmercury that is toxic to humans. Naturally occurring dissolved organic matter is a controller in these transformations, and we demonstrate that its strength of interaction with mercury is time dependent. These changes in complexation with dissolved organic matter are likely to affect mercury’s reactivity in aquatic systems, thereby influencing how mercury is methylated and bioaccumulated.

Abstract. Mercury interactions with dissolved organic matter (DOM) are important in aquatic environments but the kinetics of Hg binding to and repartitioning within the DOM remain poorly understood. We examined changes in Hg–DOM complexes using glutathione (GSH) titrations, coupled with stannous-reducible Hg measurements during Hg equilibration with DOM. In laboratory prepared DOM solutions and in water from a Hg-contaminated creek, a fraction of the Hg present as Hg–DOM complexes did not react to GSH addition. This unreactive Hg fraction increased with time from 13 % at 1 h to 74 % after 48 h of equilibration with a Suwannee River DOM. In East Fork Poplar Creek water in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, ~58 % of the DOM-complexed Hg was unreactive with GSH 1 h after the sample was collected. This time-dependent increase in unreactive Hg suggests that Hg forms stronger complexes with DOM over time. Alternatively the DOM-complexed Hg may become more sterically protected from the ligand exchange reactions, as the binding environment changes within the DOM over time. These results have important implications to understanding Hg transformations in the natural environment, particularly in contaminated aquatic systems due to non-equilibrium interactions between Hg and DOM.

Additional keywords: complexation, kinetics, organic ligands, reactive mercury.

References

[1] M. Ravichandran, Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter – a review Chemosphere 2004, 55, 319.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[2] J. M. Benoit, R. P. Mason, C. C. Gilmour, G. R. Aiken, Constants for mercury binding by dissolved organic matter isolates from the Florida Everglades Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2001, 65, 4445.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[3] J. D. Gasper, G. R. Aiken, J. N. Ryan, A critical review of three methods used for the measurement of mercury (Hg²⁺)-dissolved organic matter stability constants Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22, 1583.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[4] U. Skyllberg, Competition among thiols and inorganic sulfides and polysulfides for Hg and MeHg in wetland soils and sediments under suboxic conditions: illumination of controversies and implications for MeHg net production J. Geophys. Res. – Biogeosciences 2008, 113, G00C03.
| CrossRef |

[5] C. R. Hammerschmidt, W. F. Fitzgerald, P. H. Balcom, P. T. Visscher, Organic matter and sulfide inhibit methylmercury production in sediments of New York/New Jersey Harbor Mar. Chem. 2008, 109, 165.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[6] B. Allard, I. Arsenie, Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances in aquatic system – an important process for the mercury cycle Water Air Soil Pollut. 1991, 56, 457.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[7] B. H. Gu, Y. R. Bian, C. L. Miller, W. M. Dong, X. Jiang, L. Y. Liang, Mercury reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1479.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[8] P. C. Pickhardt, N. S. Fisher, Accumulation of inorganic and methylmercury by freshwater phytoplankton in two contrasting water bodies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 125.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[9] C. L. Miller, G. Southworth, S. Brooks, L. Y. Liang, B. H. Gu, Kinetic controls on the complexation between mercury and dissolved organic matter in a contaminated environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8548.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[10] F. J. Black, K. W. Bruland, A. R. Flegal, Competing ligand exchange-solid phase extraction method for the determination of the complexation of dissolved inorganic mercury(II) in natural waters Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 598, 318.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[11] A. J. Poulain, D. M. Orihel, M. Amyot, M. J. Paterson, H. Hintelmann, G. R. Southworth, Relationship to aquatic between the loading rate of inorganic mercury ecosystems and dissolved gaseous mercury production and evasion Chemosphere 2006, 65, 2199.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[12] C. L. Babiarz, J. P. Hurley, S. R. Hoffmann, A. W. Andren, M. M. Shafer, D. E. Armstrong, Partitioning of total mercury and methylmercury to the colloidal phase in freshwaters Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4773.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[13] W. M. Dong, Y. R. Bian, L. Y. Liang, B. H. Gu, Binding constants of mercury and dissolved organic matter determined by a modified ion exchange technique Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3576.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[14] M. Haitzer, G. R. Aiken, J. N. Ryan, Binding of mercury(II) to dissolved organic matter: the role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3564.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[15] H. Hsu, D. L. Sedlak, Strong Hg^II complexation in municipal wastewater effluent and surface waters Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2743.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[16] C. H. Lamborg, C. M. Tseng, W. F. Fitzgerald, P. H. Balcom, C. R. Hammerschmidt, Determination of the mercury complexation characteristics of dissolved organic matter in natural waters with ‘reducible Hg’ titrations Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 3316.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[17] W. M. Dong, L. Y. Liang, S. Brooks, G. Southworth, B. H. Gu, Roles of dissolved organic matter in the speciation of mercury and methylmercury in a contaminated ecosystem in Oak Ridge, Tennessee Environ. Chem. 2010, 7, 94.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[18] K. Xia, U. L. Skyllberg, W. F. Bleam, P. R. Bloom, E. A. Nater, P. A. Helmke, X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for the complexation of Hg^II by reduced sulfur in soil humic substances Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 257.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[19] D. Hesterberg, J. W. Chou, K. J. Hutchison, D. E. Sayers, Bonding of Hg^II to reduced organic sulfur in humic acid as affected by S/Hg ratio Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 2741.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[20] R. T. Drexel, M. Haitzer, J. N. Ryan, G. R. Aiken, K. L. Nagy, Mercury(II) sorption to two Florida Everglades peats: evidence for strong and weak binding and competition by dissolved organic matter released from the peat Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4058.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[21] U. Skyllberg, P. R. Bloom, J. Qian, C. M. Lin, W. F. Bleam, Complexation of mercury(II) in soil organic matter: EXAFS evidence for linear two-coordination with reduced sulfur groups Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4174.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[22] S. H. Han, G. A. Gill, Determination of mercury complexation in coastal and estuarine waters using competitive ligand exchange method Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6607.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[23] G. R. Aiken, D. M. McKnight, K. A. Thorn, E. M. Thurman, Isolationof hydrophilic organic-acids frm water using nonionic macroporous resins Org. Geochem. 1992, 18, 567.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[24] R. L. Malcolm, G. R. Aiken, E. C. Bowles, J. D. Malcolm, Isolation of Fulvic and Humic Acids from the Suwannee River, in Humic Substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia: Interactions, Properties, and Proposed Structures (Eds R. C. Averett, J. A. Leenheer, D. M. McKnight, K. A. Thorn) 1995 (United States Government Printing, US Geological Survey: Denver , CO).

[25] S. M. Serkiz, E. M. Perdue, Isolation of dissolved organic matter form the suwannee river using reverse osmosis Water Res. 1990, 24, 911.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[26] H. Hsu-Kim, D. L. Sedlak, Similarities between inorganic sulfide and the strong Hg^II – complexing ligands in municipal wastewater effluent Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4035.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[27] S. C. Brooks, G. R. Southworth, History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 219.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[28] N. S. Bloom, E. A. Crecelius, Determination of mercury in seawater at sub-nanogram per liter levels Mar. Chem. 1983, 14, 49.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[29] D. L. Parkhurst, C. A. J. Appelo, User’s Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) – A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations 2004 (US Geological Survey: Denver, CO).

[30] P. D. Oram, X. J. Fang, Q. Fernando, P. Letkeman, D. Letkeman, The formation constants of mercury(II)-glutathione complexes Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 709.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[31] N. Bloom, W. F. Fitzgerald, Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low-temperature gas-chromatography with cold-vapor atomic fluorescence detection Anal. Chim. Acta 1988, 208, 151.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[32] A. E. Martell, R. M. Smith, R. J. Motekaitis, NIST Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal Complexes Data Base, NIST Std. Ref. Database # 46 1998 (US Department of Commerce: Gaithersburg, MD).

[33] K. L. Nagy, A. Manceau, J. D. Gasper, J. N. Ryan, G. R. Aiken, Metallothionein-like multinuclear clusters of mercury(ii) and sulfur in peat Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 7298.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[34] C. A. Gerbig, C. S. Kim, J. P. Stegemeier, J. N. Ryan, G. R. Aiken, Formation of nanocolloidal metacinnabar in mercury-DOM-sulfide systems Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 9180.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[35] M. Amyot, D. R. S. Lean, L. Poissant, M. R. Doyon, Distribution and transformation of elemental mercury in the St Lawrence River and Lake Ontario Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2000, 57, 155.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[36] G. M. Vandal, W. F. Fitzgerald, K. R. Rolfhus, C. H. Lamborg, Modeling the elemental mercury cycle in Pallette Lake, Wisconsin, USA Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 529.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[37] D. M. Orihel, M. J. Paterson, P. J. Blanchfield, R. A. Bodaly, H. Hintelmann, Experimental evidence of a linear relationship between inorganic mercury loading and methylmercury accumulation by aquatic biota Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4952.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[38] R. C. Harris, J. W. M. Rudd, M. Amyot, C. L. Babiarz, K. G. Beaty, P. J. Blanchfield, R. A. Bodaly, B. A. Branfireun, C. C. Gilmour, J. A. Graydon, A. Heyes, H. Hintelmann, J. P. Hurley, C. A. Kelly, D. P. Krabbenhoft, S. E. Lindberg, R. P. Mason, M. J. Paterson, C. L. Podemski, A. Robinson, K. A. Sandilands, G. R. Southworth, V. L. S. Louis, M. T. Tate, Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16586.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[39] G. Southworth, S. Lindberg, H. Hintelmann, M. Amyot, A. Poulain, M. Bogle, M. Peterson, J. Rudd, R. Harris, K. Sandilands, D. Krabbenhoft, M. Olsen, Evasion of added isotopic mercury from a northern temperate lake Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 53.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[40] G. Aiken, H. Hsu-Kim, J. N. Ryan, Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3196.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help