CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
Journal Banner
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

red arrow PrometheusWiki
blank image
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 36(3)

Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses

Lucas A. Cernusak A N, Guillaume Tcherkez B, Claudia Keitel C, William K. Cornwell D, Louis S. Santiago E, Alexander Knohl F, Margaret M. Barbour G, David G. Williams H, Peter B. Reich I, David S. Ellsworth J, Todd E. Dawson K, Howard G. Griffiths L, Graham D. Farquhar C, Ian J. Wright M

A Charles Darwin University, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
B Plateforme Métabolisme-Metabolome IFR87, Batiment 630, IBP CNRS UMR8618, Université Paris-Sud XI, 91405 Orsay cedex, France.
C Environmental Biology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
D Biodiversity Research Group, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
E Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
F Institute of Plant Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.
G Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Gerald Street, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.
H Department of Renewable Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
I Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
J Center for Plant and Food Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia.
K Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
L Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK.
M Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
N Corresponding author. Email: lucas.cernusak@cdu.edu.au
 
PDF (486 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Non-photosynthetic, or heterotrophic, tissues in C3 plants tend to be enriched in 13C compared with the leaves that supply them with photosynthate. This isotopic pattern has been observed for woody stems, roots, seeds and fruits, emerging leaves, and parasitic plants incapable of net CO2 fixation. Unlike in C3 plants, roots of herbaceous C4 plants are generally not 13C-enriched compared with leaves. We review six hypotheses aimed at explaining this isotopic pattern in C3 plants: (1) variation in biochemical composition of heterotrophic tissues compared with leaves; (2) seasonal separation of growth of leaves and heterotrophic tissues, with corresponding variation in photosynthetic discrimination against 13C; (3) differential use of day v. night sucrose between leaves and sink tissues, with day sucrose being relatively 13C-depleted and night sucrose 13C-enriched; (4) isotopic fractionation during dark respiration; (5) carbon fixation by PEP carboxylase; and (6) developmental variation in photosynthetic discrimination against 13C during leaf expansion. Although hypotheses (1) and (2) may contribute to the general pattern, they cannot explain all observations. Some evidence exists in support of hypotheses (3) through to (6), although for hypothesis (6) it is largely circumstantial. Hypothesis (3) provides a promising avenue for future research. Direct tests of these hypotheses should be carried out to provide insight into the mechanisms causing within-plant variation in carbon isotope composition.

Keywords: diel cycle, heterotrophic tissue, PEP-carboxylase, refixation, respiration.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014