CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
Journal Banner
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow PrometheusWiki
blank image
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 39(6)

Functional unfold principal component analysis for automatic plant-based stress detection in grapevine

Annelies Baert A C , Kris Villez B and Kathy Steppe A

A Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology, Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
B Laboratory for Intelligent Process Systems, School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: aebaert.baert@ugent.be

Functional Plant Biology 39(6) 519-530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/FP12007
Submitted: 10 January 2012  Accepted: 26 April 2012   Published: 22 May 2012


 
PDF (603 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Detection of drought stress is of great importance in grapevines because the plant’s water status strongly affects the quality of the grapes and hence, resulting wine. Measurements of stem diameter variations show promise for detecting drought stress, but they depend strongly on microclimatic changes. Tools for advanced data analysis might be helpful to distinguish drought from microclimate effects. To this end, we explored the possibilities of two data mining techniques: Unfold principal component analysis (UPCA) – an already established tool in several biotechnological domains – and functional unfold principal component analysis (FUPCA) – a newer technique combining functional data analysis with UPCA. With FUPCA, the original, multivariate time series of variables are first approximated by fitting the least-squares optimal linear combination of orthonomal basis functions. The resulting coefficients of these linear combinations are then subjected to UPCA. Both techniques were used to detect when the measured stem diameter variations in grapevine deviated from their normal conditions due to drought stress. Stress was detected with both UPCA and FUPCA days before visible symptoms appeared. However, FUPCA is less complex in the statistical sense and more robust than original UPCA modelling. Moreover, FUPCA can handle days with missing data, which is not possible with UPCA.

Additional keywords: drought stress, functional data analysis, statistical process control, stem diameter variations, Vitis vinifera.


References

Bacci L, De Vincenzi M, Rapi B, Arca B, Benincasa F (1998) Two methods for the analysis of colorimetric components applied to plant stress monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 19, 167–186.
CrossRef |

Baeza P, Sánchez-de-Miguel P, Centeno A, Junquera P, Linares R, Lissarrague JR (2007) Water relations between leaf water potential, photosynthesis and agronomic vine response as a tool for establishing thresholds in irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae 114, 151–158.
CrossRef | CAS |

Bicciato S, Bagno A, Soldà M, Manfredini R, Di Bello C (2002) Fermentation diagnosis by multivariate statistical analysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 102–103, 49–62.
CrossRef |

Chen J, Liu J (2001) Derivation of function space analysis based PCA control charts for batch process monitoring. Chemical Engineering Science 56, 3289–3304.
CrossRef | CAS |

Choné X, Van Leeuwen C, Dubourdieu D, Gaudillère J-P (2001) Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Annals of Botany 87, 477–483.
CrossRef |

Creasy GL, Creasy LL (2009) Grapes. In ‘Crop production science in horticulture 16’. (Eds J Atherton, A Rees) pp. 70–155. (CABI: Oxfordshire, UK)

Cruiziat P, Tyree MT (1990) La montée de la sève dans les arbres. La Recherche 21, 406–414.

Daudet F-A, Améglio T, Cochard H, Archilla O, Lacointe A (2005) Experimental analysis of the role of water and carbon in tree stem diameter variations. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 135–144.
| CAS |

De Swaef T, Steppe K (2010) Linking stem diameter variations to sap flow, turgor and water potential in tomato. Functional Plant Biology 37, 429–438.
CrossRef |

De Swaef T, Steppe K, Lemeur R (2009) Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agricultural Water Management 96, 541–550.
CrossRef |

De Swaef T, Verbist K, Cornelis W, Steppe K (2012) Tomato sap flow, stem and fruit growth in relation to water availability in rockwool growing medium. Plant and Soil 350, 237–252.
CrossRef | CAS |

Dunia R, Qin J (1998) Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction. AIChE Journal 44, 1813–1831.
| CAS |

Fereres E, Goldhamer DA (2003) Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 78, 139–144.

Fernández JE, Cuevas MV (2010) Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: a review. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150, 135–151.
CrossRef |

Gaudillère J-P, Van Leeuwen C, Ollat N (2002) Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 757–763.
CrossRef |

Génard M, Fishman S, Vercambre G, Huguet J-G, Bussi C, Besset J, Habib R (2001) A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants. Plant Physiology 126, 188–202.
CrossRef |

Goldhamer D, Fereres E (2001) Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrigation Science 20, 115–125.
CrossRef |

Gurden SP, Westerhuis JA, Bro R, Smilde AK (2001) A comparison of multiway regression and scaling methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 59, 121–136.
CrossRef | CAS |

Hoefsloot HCJ, Verouden MPH, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK (2006) Maximum likelihood scaling (MALS). Journal of Chemometrics 20, 120–127.
CrossRef | CAS |

Hotelling H (1947) Multivariate quality control – illustrated by the testing of sample bombsights. In ‘Selected techniques of statistical analysis’. (Ed. O Eisenhart) pp. 113–184. (McGraw-Hill: New York, USA)

Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2007) Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations. Irrigation Science 26, 49–59.
CrossRef |

Jackson J (1991) ‘A user’s guide to principal components.’ (Wiley-Interscience: New York, USA)

Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) ‘Applied multivariate statistical analysis.’ 5th edn. (Prentice-Hall Inc.: New Jersey, USA)

Jones HG (1990) Plant water relations and implications for irrigation scheduling. Acta Horticulturae 278, 67–76.

Jones HG (1992) ‘Plants and microclimate. A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology.’ 5th edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Jones HG (2004) Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 2427–2436.
CrossRef | CAS |

Keller M (2010) Managing grapevines to optimise fruit development in a challenging environment: a climate change primer for viticulturists. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 16, 56–69.
CrossRef |

Kourti T (2002) Process analysis and abnormal situation detection: from theory to practice. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 22, 10–25.
CrossRef |

Lee DS, Vanrolleghem PA (2003) Monitoring of a sequencing batch reactor using adaptive multiblock principal component analysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 82, 489–497.
CrossRef | CAS |

Lennox J, Rosén C (2002) Adaptive multiscale principal components analysis for online monitoring of wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology 45, 227–235.
| CAS |

Lennox B, Montague GA, Hiden HG, Kornfeld G, Goulding PR (2001) Process monitoring of an industrial fed-batch fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 74, 125–135.
CrossRef | CAS |

MacGregor JF, Jaeckle C (1994) Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers 40, 826–838.
CrossRef | CAS |

MacGregor JF, Kourti T (1995) Statistical process control of multivariate processes. Control Engineering Practice 3, 403–414.
CrossRef |

Matthews MA, Ishii R, Anderson MM, O’Mahony M (1990) Dependence of wine sensory attributes on vine water status. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 51, 321–335.
CrossRef | CAS |

Möller M, Alchanatis V, Cohen Y, Meron M, Tsipris J, Naor A, Ostrovsky V, Sprintsin M, Cohen S (2007) Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 827–838.
CrossRef |

Nomikos P, MacGregor J (1994) Monitoring batch process using multiway principal component analysis. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers 40, 1361–1375.
CrossRef | CAS |

Ortuño MF, Conejero W, Moreno F, Moriana A, Intrigliolo DS, Biel C, Mellisho CD, Pérez-Pastor A, Domingo R, Ruiz-Sanchez MC, Casadesus J, Bonany J, Torrecillas A (2010) Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Agricultural Water Management 97, 1–11.
CrossRef |

Patakas A, Noitsakis B, Chouzouri A (2005) Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 106, 253–259.
CrossRef |

Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2005) ‘Functional data analysis.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York, USA)

Ramsay JO, Hooker G, Graves S (2009) ‘Functional data analysis with R and MATLAB.’ (Springer: New York, USA)

Rosén C, Lennox JA (2001) Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of wastewater treatment operation. Water Research 35, 3402–3410.
CrossRef |

Schultz HR (2000) Climate change and viticulture: a European perspective on climatology, carbon dioxide and UV-B effects. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 6, 2–12.
CrossRef | CAS |

Schultz HR, Stoll M (2010) Some critical issues in environmental physiology of grapevines: future challenges and current limitations. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 16, 4–24.
CrossRef | CAS |

Smart RE, Robinson M (1991) ‘Sunlight into wine: handbook for wine grape canopy management.’ (Winetitles: Adelaide, Australia)

Smart RE, Dick JK, Gravett IM, Fisher BM (1990) Canopy management to improve grape yield and wine quality – principles and practices. South African Journal of Enology & Viticulture 11, 3–17.

Steppe K, Lemeur R (2004) An experimental system for analysis of the dynamic sap-flow characteristics in young trees: results of a beech tree. Functional Plant Biology 31, 83–92.
CrossRef |

Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R, Vanrolleghem PA (2006) A mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth. Tree Physiology 26, 257–273.
CrossRef |

Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R (2008) A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling. Irrigation Science 26, 505–517.
CrossRef |

Steppe K, Cochard H, Lacointe A, Améglio T (2012) Could rapid diameter changes be facilitated by a variable hydraulic conductance? Plant, Cell & Environment 35, 150–157.
CrossRef | CAS |

Turlach BA (2005) Shape constrained smoothing using smoothing splines. Computational Statistics 20, 81–104.
CrossRef |

Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) ‘Xylem structure and the ascent of sap.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany)

Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part III: process history based methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering 27, 327–346.
CrossRef | CAS |

Villez K, Ruiz M, Sin G, Colomer J, Rosén C, Vanrolleghem PA (2008) Combining multiway principal component analysis and clustering for efficient data mining of historical data sets of SBR processes. Water Science and Technology 57, 1659–1666.
CrossRef |

Villez K, Steppe K, De Pauw DJW (2009) Use of Unfold PCA for on-line plant stress monitoring and sensor failure detection. Biosystems Engineering 103, 23–34.
CrossRef |

Wentzell PD, Lohnes MT (1999) Maximum likelihood principal component analysis with correlated measurement errors: theoretical and practical considerations. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 45, 65–85.
CrossRef | CAS |

Williams LE (2000) Grapevine water relations. In ‘Raisin production manual’. (Ed. LP Christensen) pp. 121–126. (University of California, Agricultural and Natural Resources Publications: Oakland, CA, USA)

Williams LE, Matthews MA (1990) Grapevine. In ‘Irrigation of agricultural crops. Agronomy Monograph no. 30’. (Eds BA Stewart, DR Nielsen) pp. 1019–1055. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Wold S, Geladi P, Esbensen K, Öhman J (1987) Multi-way principal components and PLS-analysis. Journal of Chemometrics 1, 41–56.
CrossRef | CAS |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013