CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
  Journal of BirdLife Australia
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

red arrow Complete Archive
blank image
With the complete digital archive of Emu now online, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely.

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 102(2)

Bower location by the Spotted Bowerbird (Chlamydera maculata)

A. J. Miles and J. R. Madden

Emu 102(2) 187 - 193
Published: 03 July 2002


This study records the spatial distribution of Spotted Bowerbird (Chlamydera maculata) bowers at a study site in central Queensland, and examines how vegetation characteristics, the location of conspecific's bowers and canopy architecture affect bower location. Bowers were preferentially situated in brigalow regrowth habitat, with a mean (± s.d.) nearest-neighbour distance of 1059 ± 516 m. Bowers were evenly spaced within the region of highest bower density (20 bowers), but not within the study area as a whole. Bush canopy above bowers was thicker, attenuated more light, and covered a greater area than that of randomly selected bushes. Bower location within a bush was associated with a narrow range of canopy heights. These results suggest that bower location is primarily determined by large-scale habitat preferences. Secondly, within suitable habitat, bower location is influenced by male-male interactions. At a third, finer scale, choice of bower site is strongly influenced by microhabitat preferences, specifically bush architecture. The possibility that displaying under bushes represents a strategy for minimising aerial predation, and/or enhancing the visual characteristics of display elements, is discussed.

Full text doi:10.1071/MU00039

© Royal Australian Ornithologists Union 2002

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (133 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016