CSIRO Publishing Home Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Emu
  The Journal of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists´ Union
You are here: Journals > Emu   
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editor
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Browse Content
For Authors
For Referees
Subscribe

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Male and female contact calls differentially influence behaviour in a cockatoo, the Galah (Eolophus roseicapillus)

Judith C. Scarl

Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; and Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. Present address: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Email: jscarl@indiana.edu


Abstract

Even in species in which males and females share a repertoire of calls, subtle sex differences in vocalisations often exist, particularly in calls used for long-distance communication. However, few studies address whether birds respond differently to similar male and female calls. This study investigated whether an Australian cockatoo, the Galah (Eolophus roseicapillus), responds differentially to three types of loud calls (Double Chet, Chechet and Chewp) commonly produced by both sexes. I played back male and female vocalisations to wild Galahs in Canberra, Australia, and recorded vocal and approach responses. Galahs responded differently to at least one call type, with birds approaching male Double Chets more closely but vocalising more to female Double Chets. Males were more likely than females to vocalise to Double Chets and Chechets, regardless of stimulus sex. These results suggest that males may have to expend more effort than females in forming affiliative relationships. Although males and females exhibited different vocal behaviour, paired males and females tended to approach stimuli together, which may indicate that coordination of movement, rather than coordination of vocal behaviour, is important in maintaining the pair-bond. These experiments show that even when the sexes share a repertoire, the sender and receiver sex may influence the nature of a vocal interaction.

Keywords: communication, parrot, sex differences, sex, vocalisation.

Emu 109(4) 281–287    doi:10.1071/MU08067
Submitted: 28 November 2008    Accepted: 12 October 2009    Published: 24 November 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (520 KB) $25
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010