CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
Emu
http://www.birdlife.org.au
  A Journal of BirdLife Australia
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Rowley Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

red arrow Complete Archive
blank image
With the complete digital archive of Emu now online, we have selected some of the most interesting and significant papers for readers to access freely.

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook   TwitterIcon

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 79(3)

Co-existence of three species of treecreepers in North-Eastern New South Wales

RA Noske

Emu 79(3) 120 - 128
Published: 1979

Abstract

The White-throated Climacteris leucophaea, Red-browed C. erythrops and Brown C. picumnus Treecreepers are sympatric in south-eastern Australia. All three appear to feed largely on ants. I compared the ecology and behaviour of these birds in the non-breeding season of 1976 at Wollomombi Falls, forty kilometres east of Armidale, NSW. Here the three species occur in the same habitat and may be seen foraging on the same trees at the same time.

The Brown spent almost half its time on the ground or on lwgs but the Red-browet and Whitethroated foraged almost entirely on trees. The last two species occurred at similar helghts and on branches of similar sizes but an different types of trees and had different foraging techniques. The White-throated mostly foraged by pecking and excavating pieces of bark from rough-barked trees such as stringybarks. The Red-browed typically peered and probed into ribbons of bark hanging from smoothbarked trees such as Yellow Box Eucalyptus melliodora. These two species also differed in social organization; the White-throated was territorial and usually solitary but the Red-browed occurred in groups of three or four individuals.

In aggressive encounters the larger Brown Treecreeper dominated the other two. The Red-browed always dominated the White-throated although these two species are similar in size.



Full text doi:10.1071/MU9790120

© Royal Australian Ornithologists Union 1979

blank image >
 
PDF (942 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013