CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Emu   
  Journal of BirdLife Australia
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Rowley Review Series
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with BirdLife
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 85(3)

Huddle-roosting behaviour of the Varied Sittella Daphoenositta chrysoptera in relation to social status

RA Noske

Emu 85(3) 188 - 194
Published: 1985


The Varied Sittella Daphoenositta chrysoptera is a small communally-breeding passerine. Throughout the year, the members of a group roost together, huddling alongside each other on a dead branch, facing the same way. In one marked group of five to seven birds, the two oldest males were usually the first to arrive at the roost-sites, and always occupied the end positions of the huddle. The breeding female was usually third to arrive, but her position in the huddle, as with the remaining group members, changed unpredictably during the period of study. The outermost male, which had the least restricted view, stayed awake longer than the other group members, suggesting a guard role. The juveniles were the first to go to sleep, possibly due to lack of responsibility. The ritualised submissive behaviour of the non-breeding male towards the breeding male, and aggressive interactions between other group members, when arriving at the roost indicate that the roost-site is an important place for reinforcing, and perhaps even establishing, dominance relations. Although predation and social cohesion undoubtedly influence the roosting behaviour of this species, the primary function of huddling is probably energy conservation.

Full text doi:10.1071/MU9850188

© Royal Australian Ornithologists Union 1985

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (528 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016