Attitudes of primary health care physician managers toward research: a pre-experimental study

Article

<< Previous

Contents Vol 19(2)

doi:10.1071/PY11146

The issues influencing community health services and primary health care

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Board

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Instructions to Authors

	Submit Article



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our email Early Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Attitudes of primary health care physician managers toward research: a pre-experimental study

Saulat Jahan ^A ^C and Basem Henary ^B

^A Research and Information Unit, Primary Health Care Administration, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
^B Medical Education, Training, and Research Center (MERC), Directorate of Health, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
^C Corresponding author. Email: saulatjahan@hotmail.com

Australian Journal of Primary Health 19(2) 171-176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PY11146
Submitted: 26 November 2011 Accepted: 14 March 2012 Published: 26 April 2012





	PDF (188 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

Research in primary health care (PHC) is underdeveloped and scarce, especially in developing countries. It is important to understand the attitudes and aspirations of PHC physicians for the promotion of research. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of PHC physician managers toward research in Qassim province and to identify barriers that impede performing research in the PHC system. The study was based on social cognitive theory framework, and was pre-experimental with a ‘one-group pre-test–post-test’ design. The study participants were physician managers in PHC administration, Qassim. The participants’ attitudes were measured by adapting statements from the Attitude Towards Research scale. The intervention was the 1-day training program ‘Introduction to Research in Primary Health Care’. A total of 23 PHC physicians participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 45.4 (±1.6) years, and the mean years of work experience was 16.2 (±2.2) years. Only one participant had an article published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results of the study showed that PHC physicians had a baseline positive attitude toward research that was further enhanced after participating in an introductory research-training program. During the pre-test, out of the total score of 63, the mean score on attitude toward research was 48.35 (±6.8) while the mean total attitude score in the post-test was 49.7 (±6.6). However, the difference was not statistically significant at P < 0.05. The item with the highest score regarded the role of research in the improvement of health care services, while the lowest-scoring item was about support from administration to conduct research. The participants recognised lack of skills, lack of training and inadequate resources as major barriers in conducting research. Our study results suggest that the PHC physicians’ positive attitudes toward research can be further improved through in-service training. To promote research in PHC in Qassim, regular research-training programs and incentives for conducting research should be provided to the PHC physicians.

Additional keywords: barriers, perceptions, questionnaire, research participation, research utilisation, social cognitive theory.

References

Askew DA, Clavarino AM, Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB (2002) General practice research: attitudes and involvement of Queensland general practitioners. The Medical Journal of Australia 177, 74–77.

Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84, 191–215.
| CAS |

Bonner A, Sando J (2008) Examining the knowledge, attitude and use of research by nurses. Journal of Nursing Management 16, 334–343.
| CrossRef |

Creswell JW (2009) ‘Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.’ 3rd edn. (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA)

Fink R, Thompson CJ, Bonnes D (2005) Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration 35, 121–129.
| CrossRef |

Glynn LG, O’Riordan C, MacFarlane A, Newell J, Iglesias AA, Whitford D, Cantillon P, Murphy AW, et al (2009) Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: The REACH study: a survey. BMC Family Practice 10, 33
| CrossRef |

Graffy J (2008) Engaging family practitioners in research: are we getting it right? Family Practice 25, 69–70.
| CrossRef |

Green SB, Salkind NJ (2011) ‘Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: analyzing and understanding data.’ 6th edn. (Pearson: Upper Saddle River)

Greenhalgh T (1996) Is my practice evidence-based? British Medical Journal 313, 957–958.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Hadley J, Hassan I, Khan K (2008) Knowledge and beliefs concerning evidence-based practice amongst complementary and alternative medicine health care practitioners and allied health care professionals: a questionnaire survey. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 8, 45
| CrossRef |

Harrison RA (2005) Barriers and opportunities to developing research capacity in primary care trusts: the views of staff attached to a primary care trust. Primary Health Care Research and Development 6, 185–189.
| CrossRef |

Harrison JA, Brady AM, Kulinskaya E (2001) The involvement, understanding and attitudes of dietitians towards research and audit. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 14, 319–330.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Horton R (1999) Evidence and primary care. Lancet 353, 609–610.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, Heinemann S, Kochen MM, Himmel W (2008) Simply no time? Barriers to GPs’ participation in primary health care research. Family Practice 25, 105–112.
| CrossRef |

Jarallah J, Khoja T (1998) Perception of supervisors of their role in primary healthcare programmes in Saudi Arabia. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 4, 530–538.

Jones A, Burgess TA, Farmer EA, Fuller J, Stocks NP, Taylor JE, Waters RL (2003) Building research capacity: an exploratory model of GPs’ training needs and barriers to research involvement. Australian Family Physician 32, 955–956.

Karlsson U, Törnquist K (2007) What do Swedish occupational therapists feel about research? A survey of perceptions, attitudes, intentions, and engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 14, 221–229.
| CrossRef |

Khan H, Khan S, Iqbal A (2009) Knowledge, attitudes and practices around health research: the perspective of physicians-in-training in Pakistan. BMC Medical Education 9, 46
| CrossRef |

Lionis C, Stoffers H, Hummers-Pradier E, Griffiths F, Rotar-Pavlič D, Rethans J (2004) Setting priorities and identifying barriers for general practice research in Europe. Results from an EGPRW meeting. Family Practice 21, 587–593.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Lloyd T, Phillips BR, Aber RC (2004) Factors that influence doctors’ participation in clinical research. Medical Education 38, 848–851.
| CrossRef |

Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R (2005) Social-cognitive theory. In ‘Predicting health behavior’. 2nd edn. (Eds M Conner, P Norman) pp. 127–169. (Open University Press: Buckingham)

Ministry of Health (2009) Health statistical year book 1430H – 2009D. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Available at www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/book/flash/1430/MOH_Report_1430.html [Verified 5 June 2011]

Mudd LM, Xinh P, Nechuta S, Elliott MR, Lepkowski JM, Paneth N (2008) Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the national Children’s study. Maternal and Child Health Journal 12, 684–691.
| CrossRef |

Papanastasiou EC (2005) Assessing the factor structure of a questionnaire that measures students’ attitudes towards research. Statistics Education Research Journal 4, 16–26.

Peterson GM, Jackson SL, Fitzmaurice KD, Gee PR (2009) Attitudes of Australian pharmacists towards practice-based research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 34, 397–405.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Ried K, Montgomery BD, Stocks NP, Farmer EA (2008) General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002–2006. Family Practice 25, 119–126.
| CrossRef |

Robinson G, Gould M (2000) What are the attitudes of general practitioners towards research? The British Journal of General Practice 50, 390–392.
| CAS |

Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J (2004) General practitioners’ attitudes towards research in primary care: qualitative results of a cross sectional study. BMC Family Practice 5, 31–35.
| CrossRef |

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC (1995) On the need for evidence-based medicine. Journal of Public Health 17, 330–334.
| CAS |

Salmon P, Peters S, Rogers A, Gask L, Clifford R, Iredale W, Dowrick C, Morriss R (2007) Peering through the barriers in GPs’ explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Family Practice 24, 269–275.
| CrossRef |

Sansone RA, Papaioannou G, Widerman MW (2006) Research experiences and attitudes among five disciplines of residents in the United States. Education for Primary Care 17, 227–234.

Schiavo R (2007) ‘Health communication: from theory to practice.’ (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco)

Silagy CA, Carson NE (1989) Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Family Practice 6, 173–176.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Sumi E, Murayama T, Yokode M (2009) A survey of attitudes toward clinical research among physicians at Kyoto University Hospital. BMC Medical Education 9, 75
| CrossRef |

The Lancet (2003) Is primary-care research a lost cause? The Lancet 361, 977
| CrossRef |

Van Der Weyden MB (2000) General practice research in Australia: a timely reality check. The Medical Journal of Australia 173, 569–570.
| CAS |

Whelan K, Madden AM, Thomas JE (2007) Student dietitians’ attitudes towards research and audit: a comparison with registered dietitians. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 20, 121–125.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help