Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > RJ > RJ10015
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 32(3)

Resilience of floodplain ecosystems in a semi-arid environment

Matthew J. Colloff A C and Darren S. Baldwin B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre and CSIRO Land and Water, PO Box 991, Wodonga, Vic. 3690, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: Matt.Colloff@csiro.au

The Rangeland Journal 32(3) 305-314 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ10015
Submitted: 26 March 2010  Accepted: 26 August 2010   Published: 14 September 2010

Abstract

Implicit to loss of ecosystem resilience is that systems can shift from one stable state to another as a result of disturbance. We present a conceptual model of ecosystem resilience of floodplains and wetlands in semi-arid environments like those of the Murray–Darling Basin. The model is based on a single state characterised by fluctuating wet and dry phases driven by episodic floods and droughts. It might appear that such a single state is inherently unstable, but stability, and the measure of resilience, is conferred by the capacity of floodplains and wetlands to undergo drought and yet return to a functioning wet phase following inundation as well as to undergo flooding and return to the dry phase following flood recession. Floodplains and wetlands are driven by strong, periodic abiotic disturbances and their ecosystem functions and biogeochemical processes are highly rate-limited, spatiotemporally variable and driven by relatively species-poor assemblages of plants and animals adapted to withstand drought and flooding. Extreme drying due to climatic change and over-allocation of water resources represents the primary mechanism via which resilience is lost.

Additional keywords: alternative stable state, drought, flood, ecosystem engineer, ecosystem function.


Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities Significant Projects Program and CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. This paper was greatly improved by thoughtful and constructive suggestions from Dr Nick Abel (CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences), Dr Gavin Rees (Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre and CSIRO Land and Water) and Nadeem Samnakay (Murray–Darling Basin Authority) and an anonymous referee.


References


Allen C. R., Gunderson L., Johnson A. R. (2005) The use of discontinuities and functional groups to assess relative resilience in complex systems. Ecosystems 8, 958–966.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 16 November 2009).

Baldwin D. S., Fraser M. (2009) Rehabilitation options for inland waterways impacted by sulfidic sediments – a synthesis. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 311–319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | (accessed 21 June 2009).

Brock M. A., Nielsen D. L., Shiel R. J., Green J. D., Langley J. D. (2003) Drought and aquatic community resilience: the role of eggs and seeds in sediments of temporary wetlands. Freshwater Biology 48, 1207–1218.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 8 January 2010).

Capon T. , Parsons M. , and Thoms M. (2009). ‘Floodplain Ecosystems: Resilience, Value of Ecosystem Services and Principles for Diverting Water from Floodplains.’ Waterlines Report No. 22. (National Water Commission: Canberra.)

Carpenter S. R., Ludwig D., Brock W. A. (1999) Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecological Applications 9, 751–771.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 15 March 2010).

Colloff M. J. , and Jin W. (2009). Floodplain classification. In: ‘Ecological Outcomes of Flow Regimes in the Murray–Darling Basin’. Report prepared for the National Water Commission by CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship. (Eds I. C. Overton, M. J. Colloff, T. M. Doody, B. Henderson and S. M. Cuddy.) pp. 310–324. (CSIRO: Canberra.)

Côté I. M., Darling E. S. (2010) Rethinking ecosystem resilience in the face of climate change. PLoS Biology 8(7), e1000438.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (accessed 11 January 2010).

National Land and Water Resources Audit (2001). ‘Australian Native Vegetation Assessment 2001.’ (National Land and Water Resources Audit: Canberra.) Available at: www.anra.gov.au/topics/vegetation/pubs/native_vegetation/pubs/vegfsheet-mvg20.pdf (accessed 22 January 2010).

Nyström M. (2006) Redundancy and response diversity of functional groups: implications for the resilience of coral reefs. Ambio 35, 30–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | (accessed 16 November 2009).

Walker B. (1992) Biological diversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6, 18–23.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Walker B. (1995) Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology 9, 747–752.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Walker B., Kinzig A., Langridge J. (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2, 95–113.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wolf E. C., Cooper D. J., Hobbs N. T. (2007) Hydrologic regime and herbivory stabilize an alternative state in Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications 17, 1572–1587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Wong N. K., Dorrough J., Hirth J. R., Morgan J. W., O’Brien E. (2007) Establishment of native perennial shrubs in an agricultural landscape. Austral Ecology 32, 617–625.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wright J. P., Jones C. G. (2006) The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations and challenges. Bioscience 56, 203–209.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1