CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > The Rangeland Journal   
The Rangeland Journal
  Rangeland ecology and management
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation
For Advertisers

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 34(2)

Characterising the spatial and temporal activities of free-ranging cows from GPS data

Dean M. Anderson A E, Craig Winters A, Rick E. Estell A, Ed L. Fredrickson B, Marek Doniec C, Carrick Detweiler D, Daniela Rus C, Darren James A and Barbara Nolen A

A USDA-ARS-Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
B Department of Agriculture, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475-3120, USA.
C Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
D Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: deanders@nmsu.edu

The Rangeland Journal 34(2) 149-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RJ11062
Submitted: 24 September 2011  Accepted: 10 April 2012   Published: 1 June 2012

PDF (2 MB) $25
 Export Citation

Electronic tracking provides a unique way to document behaviour by cows on a continuous basis. Over 2 years 17 beef cows with calves were fitted with global positioning system (GPS) devices programmed to record uncorrected GPS locations at 1-s intervals in a semi-desert rangeland. Each cow was periodically observed during daylight hours and foraging, walking and stationary (standing/lying) activity times were recorded across days and individual cows to calculate a mean travel rate for each activity. Data without observers present were collected immediately preceding and following the abrupt weaning of calves at between 223 and 234 days of age to evaluate the potential of classifying various travel rates into foraging, walking and stationary activity. The three activities were further characterised within a 24-h period based on the sun’s angle with respect to the horizon. Only data from cows whose equipment acquired ≥ 90% of the potential GPS positional data among consecutive days were analysed. Due to problems with the equipment, data from two cows in 2009 and two cows in 2011 met these criteria. The interval evaluated consisted of four 24-h periods before abrupt weaning and seven 24-h periods following weaning. Results suggested that uncorrected 1-s positional GPS data are satisfactory to classify the behaviour by free-ranging beef cows into foraging, walking and stationary activities. Furthermore, abrupt weaning caused cows to change their spatial and temporal behaviour across and within days. Overall, travel by cows increased post-weaning with subtle within-day behavioural changes. Further research will be required to fully understand the biological importance of spatio-temporal behaviour to optimise cattle and landscape management goals.

Additional keywords: foraging, geospatial data, livestock, travel, weaning behaviour.


Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour. Sampling Methods 49, 227–267.
| CAS |

Anderson, D. M. (2007). Virtual fencing – past, present and future. The Rangeland Journal 29, 65–78.
CrossRef |

Anderson, D. M. (2010). Geospatial methods and data analysis for assessing distribution of grazing livestock. In: ‘Proceedings 4th Grazing Livestock Nutrition Conference’. (Eds. B. W. Hess, T. Del Curto, J. G. P. Bowman and R. C. Waterman.) pp. 57–91. (Western Section American Society Animal Science: Champaign, IL.)

Anderson, D. M. (2011). Tools to study and manage grazing behaviour at multiple scales to enhance the sustainability of livestock production systems. In: ‘Proceedings IX International Rangeland Congress’. (Eds. S. R. Feldman, G. E. Oliva and M. B. Sacido.) pp. 559–564. (IX International Rangeland Congress: Rosario, Argentina.)

Anderson, D. M., Winters, C., Doniec, M., Detweiler, C., Rus, D., and Nolen, B. (2010). Spatial and temporal free-ranging cow behavior pre- and post-weaning. In: ‘Proceedings 4th Grazing Livestock Nutrition Conference’. (Eds B. W. Hess, T. Del Curto, J.G. P. Bowman, and R. C. Waterman.) p. 192. (Western Section American Society of Animal Science: Champaign, IL.)

Andrew, M. H. (1988). Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3, 336–339.
CrossRef | CAS |

Arnold, G. W. (1985). Ingestive behavior. In: ‘Ethology of Farm Animals. World Animal Science, A5. A Comprehensive Study of the Behavioural Features of the Common Farm Animls’. (Ed. A. F. Fraser.) pp 183–200. (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.: New York.)

Arnold, G. W., and Dudzinski, M. L. (1978). ‘Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals.’ (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.: New York.)

August, P., Michaud, J., Labash, C., and Smith, C. (1994). GPS for environmental applications: accuracy and precision of locational data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60, 41–45.

Bohnert, D. W., Ganskopp, D. C., Johnson, D. D., Falck, S. J., Merrill, M. L., and Clark, A. A. (2006). Effects of early weaning on cow performance, grazing behaviour, and winter feed costs in the inter-mountain west. Proceedings, Western Section. American Society of Animal Science 57, 121–124.

Brosh, A., Henkin, Z., Ungar, E. D., Dolev, A., Orlov, A., Yehuda, Y., and Aharoni, Y. (2006). Energy cost of cows’ grazing activity: use of the heart rate method and the global positioning system for direct field estimation. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1951–1967.
CrossRef | CAS |

Bryant, D. G. (1989). The ecological basis of behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22, 215–224.
CrossRef |

Cho, G. H., Bodriques, D. A., and Eveason, K. R. (2011). Identifying walking trips using GPS data. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 43, 365–372.
CrossRef |

Clapham, W. M., Fedders, J. M., Beeman, K., and Neel, J. P. S. (2011). Acoustic monitoring system to quantify ingestive behavior of free-grazing cattle. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 76, 96–104.
CrossRef |

Enríquez, D. H., Ungerfeld, R., Quintans, G., Guidoni, A. L., and Hötzel, M. J. (2010). The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves. Livestock Science 128, 20–27.
CrossRef |

Enríquez, D., Hötzel, M., and Ungerfeld, R. (2011). Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53, 1–8.

Farnsworth, K. E., and Beecham, J. A. (1999). How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from random diffusion to the ideal free distribution using biased random walks. American Naturalist 153, 509–526.
CrossRef |

Frair, J. L., Fieberg, J., Hebblewhite, M., Cagnacci, F., DeCesare, N. J., and Pedrotti, L. (2010). Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 365, 2187–2200.
CrossRef |

Frost, A. R., Schofield, C. P., Beaulah, S. A., Mottram, T. T., Lines, J. A., and Wathes, C. M. (1997). A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 17, 139–159.
CrossRef |

Ganskopp, D., Cruz, R., and Johnson, D. E. (2000). Least effort pathways?: A GIS analysis of livestock trails in rugged terrain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 179–190.
CrossRef |

García, S. C., and Holmes, C. W. (2001). Lactation curves of autumn- and spring-calved cows in pasture-based dairy systems. Livestock Production Science 68, 189–203.
CrossRef |

Gottardi, E., Tua, F., Cargnelutti, B., Maublanc, M. L., Angibault, J. M., Said, S., and Verheyden, H. (2010). Use of GPS activity sensors to measure active and inactive behaviours of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Mammalia 74, 355–362.
CrossRef |

Guo, Y., Poulton, G., Corke, P., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., Wark, T., and Swain, D. L. (2009). Using accelerometer, high sample rate GPS and magmetometer data to develop a cattle movement and behaviour model. Ecological Modelling 220, 2068–2075.
CrossRef |

Halbritter, H., and Bender, L. C. (2011). Contrasting observation and transect-based models of cattle distribution on Lincoln National Forest, New Mexico. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64, 514–520.
CrossRef |

Haley, D. B. (2006). The behavioural response of cattle (Bos taurus) to artificial weaning in two stages. PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

Havstad, K. M., Peters, D. P. C., Skaggs, R., Brown, J., Bestelmeyer, B., Fredrickson, E., Herrick, J., and Wright, J. (2007). Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecological Economics 64, 261–268.
CrossRef |

Hebblewhite, M., and Haydon, D. T. (2010). Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 365, 2303–2312.
CrossRef |

Herring, T. A. (1996). The global positioning system. Scientific American 274, 44–50.
CrossRef |

Hulbert, I. A. R., and French, J. (2001). The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 869–878.
CrossRef |

Johnson, D. D., and Ganskopp, D. C. (2008). GPS collar sampling frequency: effects on measures of resource use. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 226–231.
CrossRef |

Johnstone-Wallace, D. B., and Kennedy, K. (1944). Grazing management practices and their relationship to the behavior and grazing habits of cattle. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 34, 190–197.
CrossRef |

Kotliar, N. B., and Wiens, J. A. (1990). Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59, 253–260.
CrossRef |

Laube, P., and Purves, R. S. (2011). How fast is a cow? Cross-scale analysis of movement data. Transactions in GIS 15, 401–418.
CrossRef |

Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (Eds) (1968). ‘Man the Hunter.’ (Aldine Publishing Co: Chicago, IL.)

Lidfors, L. M., Pensen, P., and Algers, B. (1994). Suckling in free-ranging beef cattle – temporal patterning of suckling bouts and effects of age and sex. Ethology 98, 321–332.
CrossRef |

Löttker, P., Rummel, A., Traube, M., Stache, A., Šustr, P., Müller, J., and Heurich, M. (2009). New possibilities of observing animal behaviour from a distance using activity sensors in GPS-collars: an attempt to calibrate remotely collected activity data with direct behavioural observations in red deer Cervus elaphus. Wildlife Biology 15, 425–434.
CrossRef |

Low, W. A., Tweedie, R. L., Edwards, C. B. H., Hodder, R. M., Malafant, K. W. J., and Cunningham, R. B. (1981). The influence of environment on daily maintenance behavior of free-ranging shorthorn cows in central Australia. I. General introduction and descriptive analysis of day-long activities. Applied Animal Ethology 7, 11–26.
CrossRef |

Marshall, G. J., Bakhtiari, M., and Rasch, D. J. (2005). Terrestrial Crittercam System. U.S. Patent 0162279 A1. July 28. 6p. Int Cl7 GO8B 23/00.

Mathie, M., Coster, A. C. F., Lovell, N. H., and Celler, B. G. (2004). Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiological Measurement 25, R1–R-20.
CrossRef |

Merrill, M. L., Bohnert, D. W., Ganskopp, D. C., Johnson, D. D., and Falck, S. J. (2008). Effects of early weaning on cow performance, grazing behavior, and winter feed costs in the intermountain west. The Professional Animal Scientist 24, 29–34.

Moll, R. J., Millspaugh, J. J., Beringer, J., Sartwell, J., He, Z., Eggert, J. A., and Zhao, X. (2009). A terrestrial animal-borne video system for large mammals. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 66, 133–139.
CrossRef |

Moorefield, J. G., and Hopkins, H. H. (1951). Grazing habits of cattle in a mixed-prairie pasture. Journal of Range Management 4, 151–157.
CrossRef |

Moreau, M., Siebert, S., Buerkert, A., and Schlecht, E. (2009). Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats’ grazing behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119, 158–170.
CrossRef |

Muller, C. J. C., Botha, J. A., and Smith, W. A. (1994). Effect of shade on various parameters of Friesian cows in a Mediterranean climate in South Africa. 3. Behaviour. South African Journal of Animal Science 24, 61–66.

Nams, V. O., and Bourgeois, M. (2004). Fractal analysis measures habitat use at different spatial scales: an example with American marten. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82, 1738–1747.
CrossRef |

Nielson, R. M., Manly, B. F., McDonald, L. L., Sawyer, H., and McDonald, T. L. (2009). Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%. Ecology 90, 2956–2962.
CrossRef |

Peters, D. P. C., and Gibbens, R. P. (2006). Plant communities in the Jornada Basin: the dynamic landscape. In: ‘Structure and Function of a Chihuahuan Desert Ecosystem: The Jornada Basin Long-term Ecological Research Site’. (Eds K. M. Havstad, L. F. Huenneke and W. H. Schlesinger.) pp. 211–231. (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Piccione, G., and Giovanni, C. (2002). Biological rhythm in livestock. Journal of Veterinary Science 3, 145–157.

Price, E. O., Harris, J. E., Borgwardt, R. E., Sween, M. L., and Connor, J. M. (2003). Fence line contact of beef calves with their dams at weaning reduces the negative effects of separation on behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 81, 116–121.
| CAS |

Putfarken, D., Dengler, J., Lehmann, S., and Härdtle, W. (2008). Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: a GPS/GIS assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 54–67.
CrossRef |

Ramseyer, A., Thierry, B., Boissy, A., and Dumont, B. (2009). Decision-making processes in group departures of cattle. Ethology 115, 948–957.
CrossRef |

Rempel, R. S., and Rodgers, A. R. (1997). Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 525–530.
CrossRef |

Sallabanks, R. (1993). Hierarchical mechanisms of fruit selection by an avian frugivore. Ecology 74, 1326–1336.
CrossRef |

Šárová, R., Špinka, M., Panamá, J. L. A., and Šimeček, P. (2010). Graded leadership by dominant animals in a herd of female beef cattle on pasture. Animal Behaviour 79, 1037–1045.
CrossRef |

SAS Institute Inc (2009). ‘What’s New in SAS® 9.2.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.)

Scheibe, K. M., and Gromann, C. (2006). Application testing of a new three-dimensional acceleration measuring system with wireless data transfer (WAS) for behaviour analysis. Behavior Research Methods 38, 427–433.
CrossRef |

Schlecht, E., Hülsebusch, C., Mahler, F., and Becker, K. (2004). The use of differentially corrected global positioning system to monitor activities of cattle at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85, 185–202.
CrossRef |

Schwager, M., Anderson, D. M., Butler, Z., and Rus, D. (2007). Robust classification of animal tracking data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 56, 46–59.
CrossRef |

Schwager, M., Detweiler, C., Vasilescu, I., Anderson, D. M., and Rus, D. (2008). Data-driven identification of group dynamics for motion prediction and control. Journal of Field Robotics 25, 305–324.
CrossRef |

Stěhulová, I., Lidfors, L., and Špinka, M. (2008). Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 144–165.
CrossRef |

Stephen, B., Dwyer, C., Hyslop, J., Bell, M., Ross, D., Kwong, K. H., Michie, C., and Andonovic, A. (2010). Statistical interaction modeling of bovine herd behaviours. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews. Issue 99. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5599313 (accessed 10 August 2011).

Swain, D. L., Wark, T., and Bishop-Hurley, G. J. (2008). Using a high fix rate GPS data to determine the relationships between fix rate, prediction errors and patch selection. Ecological Modelling 212, 273–279.
CrossRef |

Tomkiewicz, S. M., Fuller, M. R., Kie, J. G., and Bates, K. K. (2010). Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behavior and ecological research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 365, 2163–2176.
CrossRef |

Veissier, I., Le Neindre, P., and Trillat, G. (1989). The use of circadian behaviour to measure adaptation of calves to changes in their environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22, 1–12.
CrossRef |

Venkatraman, S., Long, J. D., Pister, K. S. J., and Carmena, J. M. (2007). Wireless inertial sensors for monitoring animal behaviour. In. ‘Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBS). Proceedings 29th Annual International Conference of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)’. 22–26 Aug. 2007. pp. 378–381. (Engineering Medical Biological Sciences (EMBS): Lyons, France.)

von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., and Weary, D. M. (2007). Maternal behaviour in cattle. Hormones and Behavior 52, 106–113.
CrossRef |

Weary, D. M., and Chua, B. (2000). Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf 1. Separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after birth. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69, 177–188.
CrossRef |

Weary, D. M., Jasper, J., and Hötzel, M. J. (2008). Understanding weaning distress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 24–41.
CrossRef |

Wilson, R. P., Shepard, E. L., and Liebsch, N. (2008). Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals. Endangered Species Research 4, 123–137.
CrossRef |

XEphem (1990). Astronomical software ephemeris Version 3.7.5. Available at: www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/ (accessed 10 August 2011).

Youssef, M., Yosef, A. M., and El-Derini, M. (2010). GAC: energy-efficient hybrid GPS-accelerometer-compass GSM localization. Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference – GLOBECOM 2010’. 6–10 Dec. 2010. pp. 1–5. (Globecom 2010: Miami, FL)

Subscriber Login


Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016