CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Sexual Health   
Sexual Health
Journal Banner
  Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Scope
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Library Recommendation
For Advertisers

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn

red arrow Interview with Kit Fairley
blank image
Hear Kit Fairley speak about what is sexual health.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 3(4)

Sex preparation and diaphragm acceptability in sex work in Nairobi, Kenya

Anjali Sharma A B H I, Elizabeth Bukusi A B C, Samuel Posner D, Douglas Feldman E, Elizabeth Ngugi F, Craig R. Cohen G

A Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenyatta National Hospital, PO Box 19464-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
B Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
C Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital, PO Box 19676, Nairobi, Kenya.
D Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
E Department of Anthropology, State University of New York College, 350 New Campus Drive, Brockport, NY 14420, USA.
F Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital, PO Box 19676, Nairobi, Kenya.
G Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 50 Beale St, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
H Present address: Suite 311, 3rd Floor, Theodak Plaza, National Hospital Road, Off Constitution Ave, Central Business District, P.M.B. 69, Garki, Abuja, Nigeria.
I Corresponding author. Email: asharma@csrtkenya.org or anjali_sharma@hotmail.com
 
PDF (115 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Background: Women in sex work stand to benefit if the contraceptive diaphragm alone or combined with a microbicide proves to be an effective barrier method against HIV and sexually transmissible infection (STI). Currently, contraceptive diaphragm users are advised to leave the diaphragm in situ without concomitant use of other intravaginal substances for at least 6 h after intercourse. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews on sexual behaviour including post-coital intravaginal practices with 36 women in sex work and 26 of their clients and held two focus-group discussions, each with 10 women. Results: The women described adapting several potentially harmful substances, such as cloth and soapy water, for post-coital vaginal use to ensure personal hygiene, disease prevention and client pleasure. Some wanted to clean themselves and remove the diaphragm early, fearing exposure to HIV infection for themselves and their subsequent clients. Clients indicated their desire for ‘dry sex’, vaginal cleanliness and reduced risk of infection through vaginal cleaning. Conclusions: The diaphragm as a female-controlled barrier method for HIV/STI prevention may have limited acceptability among women in sex work if its effectiveness depends on a 6-h post-coital wait before removal, along with avoidance of concomitant use of intravaginal substances. In keeping with the beliefs of the the female sex workers and their needs and practices, alternative intravaginal substances and modes of insertion that will not disrupt vaginal flora, injure vaginal epithelium, damage the diaphragm or counteract potentially beneficial effects of microbicides are needed. The possibility of removing the diaphragm sooner than the recommended 6 h for contraception should be further studied.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2016