|
Psychosocial determinants of the intention to use a chlamydia home self-test: awareness of risk behaviour and test accuracy are important elements of educational interventions
Gaby
Ronda A B,
Loes
van Bokhoven A and
Trudy
van der Weijden A
A
Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
B
Corresponding author. Email: gaby.ronda@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Sexual Health
10(1)
93-94 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH12061
Submitted: 1 May 2012 Accepted: 4 June 2012 Published:
19
November
2012
|  |
|
|
Abstract
Background:
The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between psychosocial variables and the intention to use a chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) home self-test, to enable information to be tailored to the target population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among an internet panel. A questionnaire was sent to a sample of 227 panellists in October 2006. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of the psychosocial factors for the intention to test. Results: The response rate was 88% (n = 200). Respondents with higher intentions to use a home self-test were younger, perceived themselves to be more susceptible to chlamydia, had more personal experience with chlamydia, felt a stronger moral obligation to do a test and had a higher level of response efficacy than those with lower intentions. Conclusions: This study provides topics for educational interventions aimed at encouraging chlamydia testing in general, and at developing a more effective use of home self-test. Awareness of personal behaviour and information about the probability of false positive and false negative test results with home self-tests should be elements of these interventions.
Additional keywords:
Netherlands, perceptions, sexually transmissible infections.
|
References
[1]
Langille DB, Proudfoot K, Rigby J, Aquino-Russell C, Strang R, Forward K.
A pilot project for chlamydia screening in adolescent females using self-testing: characteristics of participants and non-participants.
Can J Public Health 2008
; 99: 117–20.
|
PubMed |
[2]
Newby KV, Wallace LM, French DP.
How do young adults perceive the risk of chlamydia infection? A qualitative study.
2012
; 17: 144–54.
|
CrossRef |
PubMed |
[3]
Wolfers M, De Zwart O, Kok G.
Adolescents in The Netherlands underestimate risk for sexually transmitted infections and deny the need for sexually transmitted infection testing.
AIDS Patient Care ST 2011
; 25: 311–9.
|
CrossRef |
[4]
Weinstein ND.
Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.
J Behav Med 1987
; 10: 481–500.
|
CrossRef |
CAS |
PubMed |
[5]
Ickenroth MHP, Ronda G, Grispen JEJ, Dinant GJ, De Vries NK, Van der Weijden T.
How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey.
BMC Fam Pract 2010
; 11: 77.
|
CrossRef |
[6]
van Dommelen L, Van Tiel FH, Ouburg S, Brouwers EE, Terporten PH, Savelkoul PH,
et al
Alarmingly poor performance in
Chlamydia trachomatis point-of-care testing.
Sex Transm Infect 2010
; 86: 355–9.
|
CrossRef |
PubMed |
[7]
Gaydos CA.
Can we climb out of the “pit” of poorly performing rapid diagnostic tests for chlamydia.
Sex Transm Infect 2009
; 85: 158.
|
CrossRef |
PubMed |
[8]
Skidmore S.
Poorly performing point-of-care tests for chlamydia: what can be done?
Sex Transm Infect 2010
; 86: 330.
|
CrossRef |
PubMed |
e-Alerts
Connect with us
