CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
Journal Banner
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
For Advertisers
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter LinkedIn

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 27(4)

Water repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity

RW Tillman, DR Scotter, MG Wallis and BE Clothier

Australian Journal of Soil Research 27(4) 637 - 644
Published: 1989


Measurements of intrinsic sorptivity (S*) by using both ethanol and water were used to indicate the extent of water-repellency in soil. Experiments with initially dry, acid-purified sand verified that in a non-repellent, nonswelling porous medium S' was indeed intrinsic to the medium, and independent of the sorbing liquid. For initially water-moist, non-repellent sand, the measured S* was different when ethanol and water were the invading fluids. But a bound can be put on this difference. It was concluded that in structurally stable soils, the ratio of S* from ethanol to that for water may be used as an index of water-repellency. In the laboratory, disturbance of repellent soil by sieving or shaking effectively removed the repellency. Subsequent incubation restored it. Field measurements of sorptivity, at a scaled negative surface potential, into an initially moist, fine, sandy loam were made. While the soil appeared to absorb water normally, the sorptivity for water was an order of magnitude lower than expected from the ethanol data. This was due, we suggest, to repellency. Some possible implications of this unexpected result are discussed.

Full text doi:10.1071/SR9890637

© CSIRO 1989

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (357 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2015