Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Precipitation associated with lightning-ignited wildfires in Arizona and New Mexico

Beth L. Hall
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA. Email: beth.hall@dri.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(2) 242-254 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06075
Published: 30 April 2007

Abstract

From 1990 to 1998, over 17 000 naturally ignited wildfires were observed in Arizona and New Mexico on US federal land during the fire season of April through October. Lightning strikes associated with these fires accounted for less than 0.35% of all recorded cloud-to-ground lightning strikes that occurred during the fire season during that time. Given the high aridity of this region, why do some lightning strikes ignite fires and others not? Natural wildfire ignitions in this region are often attributed to what is referred to as ‘dry’ lightning, or lightning with little or no precipitation. This study used daily and hourly gridded precipitation derived from historical gauge data to compare the amount of precipitation associated with natural wildfires and the amount of precipitation associated with lightning strikes that were not associated with natural wildfire events. Climatology of natural ignitions tend to peak before the time of the seasonal maximum lightning flashes and precipitation, suggesting ‘dry’ ignitions in the early part (e.g. late June, early July) of the wildfire season. Observed natural wildfires were more often associated with conditions of <2 mm of precipitation on the day of the event than were cases without an associated ignition. The majority of lightning flashes that did not cause a discovered wildfire were associated with a higher precipitation rate after the timing of the event, which suggests the possibility of the precipitation extinguishing the wildfires before discovery. Most lightning flashes that were not associated with a discovered ignition had twice as many hours with some measurable precipitation than where there were discovered ignitions, which eludes to the longer-term impact of preceding precipitation on the fuels than the lightning storm-associated precipitation. These results can be applied to gridded forecasts of amount of precipitation to indicate areas where there is an increased probability of natural wildfire ignition, assuming the other factors of ignition source and fuel availability are present.

Additional keywords: dry thunderstrom, natural wildfire ignitions.


Acknowledgements

Special thanks are extended to the Program for Climate, Ecosystem, and Fire Applications (CEFA) in the Division of Atmospheric Sciences at the Desert Research Institute for allowing the use of computational hardware and relevant datasets during this study.


References


Barrows JS (1978) Lightning fires in southwestern forests. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.

Battan LJ (1965) Some factors governing precipitation and lightning in convective clouds. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences  22, 79–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bradshaw LS, Deeming JE (1983): The 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating System: Technical Documentation. USDA For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-169, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.

Brown TJ, Hall BL, Mohrle CR, Reinbold HJ (2002) Coarse assessment of Federal Wildland Fire occurrence data. Report for the National Wildfire Coordinating Group, CEFA Report 02-04, December 2002.

Cummins KL, Krider EP , Malone MD (1998a) The US National Lightning Detection NetworkTM and applications of cloud-to-ground lightning data by electric power utilities. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Comparisons  40, 465–480.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fosberg MA, Deeming JE (1971) Derivation of the 1- and 10-hour timelag fuel moisture calculations for fire-danger rating. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-207, Fort Collins, CO.

Fuquay DM (1962) Mountain thunderstorms and forest fires. Weatherwise  15, 148–152.
Fuquay DM, Baughman RG, Latham DJ (1979) A model for predicting lightning fire ignition in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-217, Ogden, UT.

Higgins RW, Janowiak JE, Yao YP (1996) A gridded hourly precipitation data base for the United States (1963–1993). NCEP/Climate Prediction Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD.

Higgins RW, Yao Y , Wang XL (1997) Influence of the North American Monsoon system on the US summer precipitation regime. Journal of Climate  10, 2600–2622.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Higgins RW, Shi W, Yarosh E, Joyce R (2000) Improved United States precipitation quality control system and analysis. US Department of Commerce, Camp Springs, MD.

Idone VP, Davis DA, Moore PK, Wang Y, Henderson RW, Ries M , Joamason PF (1998) Performance evaluation of the US National Lightning Detection Network in eastern New York 2. Location accuracy. Journal of Geophysical Research  103(D8), 9057–9069.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Meisner BN, Chase RA, McCutchan MH, Mees R, Benoit JW, Ly B, Albright D, Strauss D, Ferryman T (1993). A lightning fire ignition assessment model. In ‘12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’. Jekyll Island, GA. pp. 172–178. (Society of American Foresters)

Orville RE, Huggines GR, Burrows WR, Holle RL , Cummins KL (2002) The North American Lightning Detection Network (NALDN) – First Results: 1998–2000. Monthly Weather Review  130, 2098–2109.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Powell DS, Faulkner J, Darr DR, Zhu Z, MacCleery DW (1992) Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-234, USDA For. Ser., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.

Price C , Rind D (1993) What determines the cloud-to-ground lightning fraction in thunderstorms? Geophysical Research Letters  20, 463–466.
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA For. Ser. Res. Pap. INT-115, Intermountain Forestry and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.

Schlobohm P, Brain J (2002) ‘Gaining and understanding of the National Fire Danger Rating System.’ National Wildfire Coordinating Group. PMS 932/NFES 2665. (National Interagency Fire Center Place: Boise, ID)

Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Hardy CC, Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2002) Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. USDA For. Ser., Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-87.

Schultz MD, Underwood SJ , Radhakrishnan P (2005) A method to identify the optimal areal unit for NLDN cloud-to-ground lightning flash data analysis. Journal of Applied Meteorology  44, 739–744.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Susott RA (1982) Characterization of the thermal properties of forest fuels by combustible gas analysis. Forest Science  28, 404–420.


van Wagner CE (1972) Duff consumption by fire in eastern pine stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  2, 34–39.


Viegas DX, Viegas MTSP , Ferreira AD (1992) Moisture content of fine forest fuels and fire occurrence in central Portugal. International Journal of Wildland Fire  2, 69–86.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xanthopoulos G , Wakimoto RH (1993) A time to ignition–temperature–moisture relationship for branches of three western conifers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  23, 253–258.


Zhu Z , Evans DL (1992) Mapping midsouth forest distributions. Journal of Forestry  90, 27–30.


Zhu Z , Evans DL (1994) U.S. forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing  60, 525–531.