CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Wildlife Research   
Wildlife Research
Journal Banner
  Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 35(4)

Application of distance sampling to estimate population densities of large herbivores in Kruger National Park

J. M. Kruger A, B. K. Reilly B C, I. J. Whyte A

A South African National Parks, Private Bag X402, Skukuza 1350, Republic of South Africa.
B Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa.
C Corresponding author. Email: reillybk@tut.ac.za
PDF (476 KB) $25
 Export Citation


Aerial surveys have been used in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to count large ungulates since the late 1970s. After 1998, aerial line-transect sampling using fixed-wing aircraft and Distance analyses replaced the ‘total’ counting method. This paper investigates these methods and three sampling intensities for estimating the densities of nine large ungulate species in Kruger National Park. Estimates suitable for the detection of population trends and making management decisions were decided by examination of coefficients of variation (set <20%, a priori). Despite the likely violation of some key assumptions of Distance sampling methods, analyses gave population estimates with adequate coefficients of variation for monitoring trends in impala, giraffe, zebra, kudu, white rhinoceros, and elephant bull populations. Significant improvements in precision were obtained at higher sampling intensities for kudu, giraffe, bull elephants and white rhinoceros, but these species already had sufficiently precise population estimates for the detection of trends at the lowest sampling intensity (15%). The estimates for warthog, wildebeest and waterbuck populations were, however, insufficiently precise for assessing population trends. Increasing sampling intensity to 22% and higher did not significantly increase the precision of the Distance estimates for these species. Shortcomings in interpretation of the data caused by violations of critical assumptions of analyses are identified and discussed.

Subscriber Login

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016