CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Wildlife Research   
Wildlife Research
Journal Banner
  Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |         Contents Vol 39(2)

Contrasting feeding patterns of native red deer and two exotic ungulates in a Mediterranean ecosystem

María Miranda A D, Marisa Sicilia A, Jordi Bartolomé B, Eduarda Molina-Alcaide C, Lucía Gálvez-Bravo A and Jorge Cassinello A

A Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas – Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha – Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.
B Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
C Estación Experimental del Zaidín – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEZ-CSIC), Camino del Jueves s/n, 18100 Granada, Spain.
D Corresponding author. Present address: School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa. Email: maria.mirandaroves@gmail.com, maria.miranda@wits.ac.za

Wildlife Research 39(2) 171-182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11146
Submitted: 8 August 2011  Accepted: 23 January 2012   Published: 26 March 2012

PDF (474 KB) $25
 Export Citation

Context: Ungulates have been widely introduced in multiple ecosystems throughout the world due to their value as food and for sport hunting. The identification of foraging preferences of exotic and native ungulates living in sympatry is, therefore, becoming increasingly important in order to assess potential impacts of introduced animals on the host ecosystem.

Aims: To describe species-specific foraging strategies and infer resource selection overlap between native and exotic ungulates.

Methods: We compared the trophic ecology of three sympatric ungulate species living in a Mediterranean landscape: the native Iberian red deer Cervus elaphus hispanicus, and two exotic bovids, the European mouflon Ovis orientalis musimon and the aoudad Ammotragus lervia. We simultaneously determined herbivore diet through analyses of botanical content in faeces and assessed the nutritional content of these diets.

Key results: Higher selection of shrubs by deer was sustained throughout the year, while bovids showed seasonal shifts in forage selection. Both bovids displayed a selective dietary strategy directed towards a higher overall nutritional quality than that of deer. Divergent exploitation patterns between the studied cervid and bovids might be related to body mass and physiological adaptations to overcome secondary defence compounds of shrubs, and were largely affected by seasonal changes in the nutritional value of available vegetation. Ecological theory suggests that diet overlap should be greater between similar-sized species. Indeed, both exotics showed similar, sometimes overlapping, dietary patterns that could lead to potential competition in the use of resources. Native red deer preferences only showed some overlap with those of exotic mouflon under constrained summer conditions.

Conclusions: Dietary overlap between deer and mouflon and between aoudad and mouflon during limiting summer conditions could entail a potential competitive interaction under more even densities of the study species, since a concurrent habitat overlap between those pairs of species has previously been reported.

Implications: The outcomes of our study suggest the need for an integration of habitat and ungulate management. Management actions in Mediterranean rangelands should be directed towards protecting habitat conditions so that biodiversity is enhanced along with the presence of sustainable communities of large herbivores. Management directed towards ungulates should maintain moderate stocking rates and monitor and control introduced and native populations.


Acevedo, P., Cassinello, J., Hortal, J., and Gortázar, C. (2007). Invasive exotic aoudad (Ammotragus lervia) as a major threat to native Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): a habitat suitability model approach. Diversity & Distributions 13, 587–597.
CrossRef |

Acevedo, P., Ruiz-Fons, F., Vicente, J., Reyes-García, A. R., Alzaga, V., and Gortazar, C. (2008). Estimating red deer abundance in a wide range of management situations in Mediterranean habitats. Journal of Zoology 276, 37–47.
CrossRef |

AOAC. (2005). ‘Official Methods of Analysis.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD Chemists: Washington, DC.)

Austin, P. J., Suchar, L. A., Robbins, C. T., and Hagerman, A. E. (1989). Tannins binding proteins in saliva of deer and their absence in saliva of sheep and cattle. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 1335–1347.
CrossRef | CAS |

Bang, P., and Dahlstrom, P. (1974). ‘Collins Guide to Animal Tracks and Signs.’ (Collins: London.)

Barroso, F. G., Martínez, T. F., Paz, T., Parra, A., and Alarcón, F. J. (2001). Tannin content of grazing plants of southern Spanish arid lands. Journal of Arid Environments 49, 301–314.
CrossRef |

Bascompte, J., and Jordano, P. (2007). Plant–animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38, 567–593.
CrossRef |

Baumont, R., Prache, S., Meuret, M., and Morand-Fehr, P. (2000). How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 64, 15–28.
CrossRef |

Beguin, J., Pothier, D., and Côté, S. D. (2011). Deer browsing and soil disturbance induce cascading effects on plant communities: a multilevel path analysis. Ecological Applications 21, 439–451.
CrossRef |

Bell, R. H. V. (1971). A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti. Scientific American 225, 86–93.
CrossRef |

Belovsky, G. (1981). Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecology 62, 1020–1030.
CrossRef |

Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 57, 289–300.

Ben-Shahar, R., and Coe, M. J. (1992). The relationships between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra. Oecologia 90, 422–428.
CrossRef |

Bertolino, S., di Montezemolo, N. C., and Bassano, B. (2009). Food-niche relationships within a guild of alpine ungulates including an introduced species. Journal of Zoology 277, 63–69.
CrossRef |

Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 26, 211–246.

Bugalho, M. N., and Milne, J. A. (2003). The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? Forest Ecology and Management 181, 23–29.
CrossRef |

Carranza, J. (2002). Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758. Ciervo rojo. In ‘Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert.) pp. 310–313. (Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Carranza, J. (2004). Ciervo – Cervus elaphus. In ‘Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles’. (Eds L. M. Carrascal and A. Salvador.) (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales: Madrid.) Available at http://www.vertebradosibericos.org/ [Verified May 2010] [In Spanish]

Carranza, J. (2007). Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758. In ‘Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo, J. Gisbert and J. C. Blanco.) pp. 352–355. (Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Cassinello, J. (1998). Ammotragus lervia: a review on systematics, biology, ecology and distribution. Annales Zoologici Fennici 35, 149–162.

Cassinello, J. (2002). Arrui – Ammotragus lervia. In ‘Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles’. (Eds L. M. Carrascal and A. Salvador.) (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales: Madrid.) Available at http://www.vertebradosibericos.org/ [Verified May 2010] [In Spanish]

Cassinello, J., Serrano, E., Calabuig, G., Acosta, P., and Pérez, J. M. (2002). Ammotragus lervia (Pallas, 1777). Arrui. In ‘Atlas de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert.) pp. 338–341. (Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-MIMAM: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Cassinello, J., Serrano, E., Calabuig, G., Acosta, P., and Pérez, J. M. (2004). Range expansion of an exotic ungulate (Ammotragus lervia) in southern Spain: ecological and conservation concerns. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 851–866.
CrossRef |

Cassinello, J., Acevedo, P., and Hortal, J. (2006). Prospects for population expansion of the exotic aoudad (Ammotragus lervia; Bovidae) in the Iberian Peninsula: clues from habitat suitability modelling. Diversity & Distributions 12, 666–678.
CrossRef |

Cassinello, J., Serrano, E., Calabuig, G., Acosta, P., and Pérez, J. M. (2007). Ammotragus lervia (Pallas, 1777). ‘Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo, J. Gisbert and J. C. Blanco.) pp. 374–377. (Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M., and Streich, J. (2003). Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physiomechanical characteristics of forage. A reevaluation of an old debate and a new hypothesis. Oikos 102, 253–262.
CrossRef |

Clauss, M., Kaiser, T., and Hummel, J. (2008). The morphological adaptations of browsing and grazing mammals. In ‘The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies.Volume 195’. (Eds I. J. Gordon and H. H. T. Prins.) pp. 47–88. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin.)

Cooper, S. M., Owen-Smith, N., and Bryant, J. P. (1988). Foliage acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to seasonal-changes in the leaf chemistry of woody-plants in a South-African savanna. Oecologia 75, 336–342.
CrossRef |

Cristóbal, I. (2006). Dieta invernal de tres especies de ungulados silvestres en un ecosistema mediterráneo. Advanced Diploma Studies dissertation. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Cugnasse, J. M. (2001). Mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) in France: past, present and future. In ‘Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mouflon’. (Eds A. Nahlik and W. Uloth.) pp. 149–156. 27–29 October 2000, Sopron, Hungary’

De Cáceres, M., and Legendre, P. (2009). Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90, 3566–3574.
CrossRef |

Demment, M. W., and Van Soest, P. J. (1985). A nutritional explanation for body size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125, 641–672.
CrossRef |

Dolman, P. M., and Wäber, K. (2008). Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wildlife Research 35, 202–214.
CrossRef |

Dufrene, M., and Legendre, P. (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.

Duncan, A. J., and Poppi, D. P. (2008). Nutritional ecology of grazing and browsing ruminants. In ‘The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies. Volume 195’. (Eds I. J. Gordon and H. H. T. Prins.) pp. 89–116. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin.)

Fandos, P., and Reig, S. (1992). Problems associated with mouflon and Barbary sheep introductions in Spain. In ‘Global Trends in Wildlife Management: 18th IUGB Congress’. (Eds B. Bobek, K. Perzanowski and W. Regelin.) pp. 139–140. Krakow, 1987. (Swiat Press, Krakow-Warszawa: Poland.)

Gagnon, M., and Chew, A. E. (2000). Dietary preferences in extant African Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy 81, 490–511.
CrossRef |

Garin, I., Aldezabal, A., García-González, R., and Aihartza, J. R. (2001). Composición y calidad de la dieta del ciervo (Cervus elaphus L.) en el norte de la Península Ibérica. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24, 53–63.

Garson, G. D. (2008). Discriminant function analysis. Statnotes: topics in multivariate analysis. Available at http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm [Verified August 2009]

Gebert, C., and Verheyden-Tixier, H. (2001). Variations of diet composition of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Europe. Mammal Review 31, 189–201.
CrossRef |

Glasser, T., Landau, S., Ungar, E. D., Perevolotsky, A., Dvash, L., Muklada, H., Kababya, D., and Walker, J. W. (2008). A fecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-aided methodology to determine goat dietary composition in a Mediterranean shrubland. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1345–1356.
CrossRef | CAS |

González-Hernández, M. P., Starkey, E. E., and Karchesy, J. (2000). Seasonal variation in concentrations of fiber, crude protein, and phenolic compounds in leaves of red alder (Alnus rubra): nutritional implications for cervids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 293–301.
CrossRef |

Gordon, I. J. (1988). Facilitation of red deer grazing by cattle and its impact on red deer performance. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 1–9.
CrossRef |

Gortázar, C., Herrero, J., Villafuerte, R., and Marco, J. (2000). Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain. Mammalia 64, 411–422.
CrossRef |

Hanley, T. A. (1982). The nutritional basis for food selection by ungulates. Journal of Range Management 35, 146–151.
CrossRef |

Henley, S. R., Smith, D. G., and Raats, J. G. (2001). Evaluation of 3 techniques for determining diet composition. Journal of Range Management 54, 582–588.
CrossRef |

Heroldová, M., Homolka, M., Kamler, J., Koubek, P., and Forejtek, P. (2007). Foraging strategy of mouflon during the hunting season as related to food supply. Acta Veterinaria 76, 195–202.
CrossRef |

Hofmann, R. R. (1989). Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457.
CrossRef |

Iason, G. R., and van Wieren, S. E. (1999). Digestive and indigestive adaptations of mammalian herbivores to low-quality forage. In ‘Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators. 38th Symposium of the British Ecological Society’. (Eds H. Olff, V. K. Brown and R. Drent.) pp. 337–369. (Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK.)

Jarman, P. J. (1974). The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267.
CrossRef |

Jarman, P. J., and Sinclair, A. R. E. (1979). Feeding strategy and the pattern of resource partitioning in ungulates. In ‘Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem’. (Eds A. R. E. Sinclair and N. Norton-Griffiths.) pp. 130–163. (Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL.)

Kingery, J. L., Mosley, J. C., and Bordwell, K. C. (1996). Dietary overlap among cattle and cervids in northern Idaho forests. Journal of Range Management 49, 8–15.
CrossRef |

Krysl, L. J., Simpson, C. D., and Gray, G. G. (1980). Dietary overlap of sympatric Babary sheep and mule deer in Palo Duro Canyon, Texas. Technical paper No. T-9–227. College of Agricultural Sciences. Texas Tech University, Austin, TX.

Langsrud, Ø. (2003). ANOVA for unbalanced data: use Type II instead of Type III sums of squares. Statistics and Computing 13, 163–167.
CrossRef |

Latham, J. (1999). Interspecific interactions of ungulates in European forests: an overview. Forest Ecology and Management 120, 13–21.
CrossRef |

Maillard, D., Casanova, J. B., and Gaillard, J. M. (1995). Dynamique de l’abroutissement dû au cerf de Corse (Cervus elaphus corsicanus) sur la végétation des enclos du parc de Quenza (Corse). Mammalia 59, 363–372.
CrossRef |

Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., Thomas, D. L., McDonald, T. L., and Ericsson, W. P. (2002). ‘Resource Selection by Animals. Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies’. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Amsterdam.)

Markov, G. G., and Penev, G. (2001). The mouflon (Ovis ammon L.) in Bulgaria: history and present status. In ‘Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mouflon’, (Eds A. Nahlik and W. Uloth.) pp. 141–148. 27–29 October 2000, Sopron, Hungary.

May, M. R. (1973). ‘Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems’. (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

McArthur, C., Goodwin, A., and Turner, S. (2000). Preferences, selection and damage to seedlings under changing availability by two marsupial herbivores. Forest Ecology and Management 139, 157–173.
CrossRef |

Mysterud, A. (2000). Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 124, 130–137.
CrossRef |

Owen-Smith, N. (1997). Distinctive features of the nutritional ecology of browsing versus grazing ruminants. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde 62, 176–191.

Pérez Maldonado, R. A., and Norton, B. W. (1996). Digestion of 14 C-labelled condensed from Desmodium intortum in sheep and goats. The British Journal of Nutrition 76, 501–513.
CrossRef |

Piñero, J. C. R., and Luengo, J. L. R. (1992). Autumn food-habits of the Babary sheep (Ammotragus lervia Pallas, 1772) on La Palma island (Canary Islands). Mammalia 56, 385–392.
CrossRef |

Prins, H. H. T., and Fritz, H. (2008). Species diversity of browsing and grazing ungulates: consequences for the structure and abundance of secondary production. In ‘The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies. Volume 195’. (Eds I. J. Gordon and H. H. T. Prins.) pp. 179–200. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin.)

Putman, R. J. (1984). Facts from faeces. Mammal Review 14, 79–97.
CrossRef |

Putman, R. J. (1996). ‘Competition and Resource Partitioning in Temperate Ungulate Assemblies.’ (Chapman and Hall: London.)

R Development Core Team. (2011). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.) Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified March 2011].

Robbins, C. T., Mole, S., Hagerman, A. E., and Hanley, T. A. (1987). Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in dry matter digestion? Ecology 68, 1606–1615.
CrossRef | CAS |

Rodríguez-Luengo, J. L., Fandos, P., and Soriguer, R. C. (2002). Muflón, Ovis gmelini Pallas, 1811. In ‘Atlas de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert.) pp. 334–337. (Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza -SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Rodríguez-Luengo, J. L., Fandos, P., and Soriguer, R. C. (2007). Ovis aries Linnaeus, 1758. In ‘Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos de España’. (Eds L. J. Palomo, J. Gisbert, J. C. Blanco.) pp. 371–373. (Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM –SECEMU: Madrid.) [In Spanish]

Rogosic, J., Pfister, J. A., Provenza, F. D., and Grbesa, D. (2006). Sheep and goat preference for and nutritional value of Mediterranean maquis shrubs. Small Ruminant Research 64, 169–179.
CrossRef |

Savage, R. E. (1931). The relation between the feeding of the herring off the east coast of England and the plankton of the surrounding waters. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Series 2 12, 1–88.

Scalbert, A. (1991). Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 30, 3875–3883.
CrossRef | CAS |

Schroener, T. W. (1986). Resource partitioning. In ‘Community Ecology, Pattern and Process’. (Eds J. Kikkawa and D. J. Anderson.) pp. 91–126 (Blackwell: Oxford, UK.)

Schwartz, C. C., and Ellis, J. E. (1981). Feeding ecology and niche separation in some native and domestic ungulates on the shortgrass prairie. Journal of Applied Ecology 18, 343–353.
CrossRef |

Shaffer, J. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis-testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46, 561–584.
CrossRef |

Sicilia, M. (2011). Ecología y comportamiento de ungulados en simpatría en un ambiente mediterráneo: interacciones entre especies nativas y exóticas de interés cinegético. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.

Smit, R., Bokdam, J., den Ouden, J., Olff, H., Schot-Opschoor, H., and Schrijvers, M. (2001). Effects of introduction and exclusion of large herbivores on small rodent communities. Plant Ecology 155, 119–127.
CrossRef |

Spear, D., and Chown, S. L. (2009). Non-indigenous ungulates as a threat to biodiversity. Journal of Zoology 279, 1–17.
CrossRef |

Stewart, D. R. M. (1967). Analysis of plant epidermis in faeces: a technique for studying the food preferences of grazing herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 4, 83–111.
CrossRef |

Van Soest, P. J. (1994). ‘Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.)

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., and Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
CrossRef | CAS |

Van Wieren, S., and van Langevelde, F. (2008). Sturcturing herbivore communities: the role of habitat and diet. In ‘Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging’. (Eds H. H. T. Prins and F. Van Langevelde.) pp. 237–262. (Springer: The Netherlands.)

Verheyden-Tixier, H., Renaud, P. C., Morellet, N., Jamot, J., Besle, J. M., and Dumont, B. (2008). Selection for nutrients by red deer hinds feeding on a mixed forest edge. Oecologia 156, 715–726.
CrossRef |

Voeten, M. M., and Prins, H. H. T. (1999). Resource partitioning between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores in the Tarangire region of Tanzania. Oecologia 120, 287–294.
CrossRef |

Zamora, R. (2000). Functional equivalence in plant-animal interactions: ecological and evolutionary consequences. Oikos 88, 442–447.
CrossRef |

Subscriber Login

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016