CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Australian Journal of Zoology
Journal Banner
  Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn


Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 50(4)

Rheotaxis by epaulette sharks, Hemiscyllium ocellatum (Chondrichthyes : Hemiscylliidae), on a coral reef flat

M. B. Peach

Australian Journal of Zoology 50(4) 407 - 414
Published: 15 November 2002


Rheotaxis (orientation to water currents) is commonly observed in fishes. Facing upstream is thought to be an element of shark behaviour during prey search and station-holding, but quantitative studies of rheotaxis by sharks in the wild are lacking. In this study, rheotaxis by the epaulette shark, Hemiscyllium ocellatum, was investigated on a coral reef flat at Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. The orientation of 78 individuals in open areas (on sand or on top of coral heads, directly exposed to the prevailing current) was analysed with respect to current direction and velocity. H. ocellatum showed a significant (P < 0.05) preference for facing upstream (mean angle 1°, where the current origin was taken to be 0/360°) while resting on the substrate (n = 23), but showed no evidence of a preferred direction while swimming (n = 50). Observations of foraging were few (n = 5) but there was no indication of a preferred direction by these sharks. Resting H. ocellatum faced significantly more upstream at faster current velocities (P < 0.05), suggesting that rheotaxis may function in station-holding. There was no apparent relationship between rheotaxis and current velocity for swimming H. ocellatum.

Full text doi:10.1071/ZO01081

© CSIRO 2002

blank image
Subscriber Login

PDF (227 KB) $25
 Export Citation
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016