CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Australian Journal of Zoology
  Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Aerodynamic cleanliness in bats

R. D. Bullen A C and N. L. McKenzie B

A 43 Murray Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025, Australia.
B Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6065, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: bullen2@bigpond.com


Abstract

In this paper we examine morphometric attributes of the airframes of 24 species of bat from Western Australia. In particular, we consider anatomical features of the ear, head, body and tail related to lift and drag optimisation as well as airflow separation control. We provide an assessment of the relative cleanliness of the species and a range of lift and drag coefficient values for use in metabolic power output modelling. The species assessed have aerodynamic cleanliness optimisations that are appropriate to the range of Reynolds’ numbers in which bats fly. Head/body relative cleanliness was consistent with, and functionally appropriate to, aspects of species foraging niche such as foraging strategy. Cleanliness of face and fineness ratio of head and body were found to be related to minimum foraging drag. Blending of the wing and body, the presence of a wing/body fillet and the texture of the pelage were found to be important. The aerodynamic optimisation of ears and tail membrane were found to correlate with foraging strategy. The interceptors had optimisations for minimum drag generation consistent with their higher foraging flight speed. Rather than being optimised for minimum drag, the air-superiority bats’ tails and ears were consistent with their highly agile but slower-foraging flight speeds. Surface bats were characterised by the absence of optimisations for low drag. The frugivore plus the nectarivore and the carnivore studied appear to be discrete optimisations.

Australian Journal of Zoology 56(5) 281–296    doi:10.1071/ZO08059
Submitted: 13 July 2008    Accepted: 4 December 2008    Published: 29 January 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (2.4 MB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010