Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A template approach to quality improvement activity: a primary care example

Christopher Fawcett A , Helen Moriarty B and Roshan Perera C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Horowhenua Community Practice, 62 Liverpool Street, PO Box 50, Levin 5540, New Zealand. Email: fawpram@xtra.co.nz

B Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South 6242, New Zealand. Email: helen.moriarty@otago.ac.nz

C Medical Education Unit, Department of the Dean, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South 6242, New Zealand.

D Corresponding author. Email: roshan.perera@otago.ac.nz

Australian Health Review 37(4) 535-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH12036
Submitted: 17 December 2012  Accepted: 9 May 2013   Published: 28 June 2013

Abstract

Introduction. This paper demonstrates the use of a Quality Framework and Implementation Template to review processes for improving the quality and safety of opiate prescribing for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP). Escalating use of prescription opiates for chronic pain is of national and international concern, with major implications for personal and public health as well as for patient safety and health service quality and safety.

Objectives. This paper uses opiate prescribing for CNMP as a worked example to illustrate use of the Quality Framework for self-directed quality improvement in smaller specialist medical or community-based practices.

Methods. An Implementation Template, comprising a series of focussed questions derived from the Quality Framework, was applied to one specific quality improvement activity arising from clinical practice (opiate prescribing for CNMP). This helped the practice team understand current systems and processes, identify actual and potential problems, and find possible solutions to institute interventions for change.

Conclusion. The template approach to quality activity is very applicable within smaller specialist or community health service settings, enabling such health services to focus on their own quality improvement activities and address topics of importance to the practice in a systematic and productive manner.

What is known about the topic? There are complex interactions and activities to be considered when undertaking quality improvement within community practice. Repeat opiate prescribing for CNMP is a significant issue for practices and patients.

What does this paper add? This paper examines the specific case of improvements to quality and safety of repeat prescribing of opiates for CNMP in small clinics and other community-based health services. This example shows how users may utilise an Implementation Template to perform a systematic and comprehensive review of their systems and processes in relation to any chosen aspect of practice-based quality improvement activity. Services could apply these same principles to any topic of interest, or practice and/or organisational activity, to undertake systematic quality improvement.

What are the implications for practitioners? The Implementation Template was designed for use by clinical practice teams. It will be helpful for practices that wish to undertake a quality improvement activity but lack the knowledge of how to proceed. Use of the template approach provides practice teams with the means to ensure that they consider the area of concern from all angles, and helps to uncover areas that might not otherwise have been considered.


References

[1]  Perera GAR, Dowell AC, Morris C. Constructing a framework for quality activity in primary care. Aust Health Rev 2012; 37 98–103.
Constructing a framework for quality activity in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP). Aiming for excellence. RNZCGP Standard for New Zealand General Practice 2011–2014. Wellington: RNZCGP; 2011.

[3]  Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. Cornerstone general practice accreditation. Available at http://www.rnzcgp.org.nz/cornerstone-general-practice-accreditation [verified 12 December 2012]

[4]  Perera GAR. Panning for gold. The assessment of performance indicators in primary health care. University of Otago: Wellington; 2009. PhD thesis

[5]  The Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Prescription opioid policy: improving management of chronic non-malignant pain and prevention of problems associated with prescription opioid use. Sydney: Royal Australian College of Physicians; 2009.

[6]  Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966; 44 166–204.
Evaluating the quality of medical care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5338568PubMed |

[7]  Donabedian A. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

[8]  Baker M, Wilson T, Marshall M. The Royal College of General Practitioners policy statement. Quality indicators in general practice. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2002.

[9]  Balmer S, Robinson M. Local target setting: developing a framework for setting local targets in health improvement programmes. Nuffield Portfolio Programme, Issue 5. Leeds: University of Leeds; 1999. p. 1–14.

[10]  Butler C, Peters J, Stott N. Glycated haemoglobin and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus: external versus locally established clinical targets for primary care. BMJ 1995; 310 784–8.
Glycated haemoglobin and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus: external versus locally established clinical targets for primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3islSjug%3D%3D&md5=f1d8c613dab2aafda40654f2808b338eCAS | 7677834PubMed |

[11]  Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51 1611–25.
Defining quality of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtl2gsg%3D%3D&md5=bfbd6bf02fff4b6d87bb95bf2bb52bd1CAS | 11072882PubMed |

[12]  Perera GAR, Moriarty H. Prescription safety pilot project: report to the Health Quality and Safety Commission. Wellington: University of Otago; 2012. Available at http://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Other-Topics/QS-challenge-reports/A-prescription-safety-pilot-project-Final-Report.pdf [verified 26 May 2013]

[13]  Pryor MG, Toombs L, Anderson D, White JC. What management and quality theories are best for small businesses? J Manage Market Res 2010; 3