Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mental health service delivery: a profile of mental health non-government organisations in south-east Queensland, Australia

Louise Byrne A B C , Michael Wilson D , Karena J. Burke A E , Cadeyrn J. Gaskin A B F and Brenda Happell A B C G
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Health and Social Science Research, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia. Email: l.byrne@cqu.edu.au

B School of Nursing and Midwifery, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

C Centre for Mental Health Nursing Innovation, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

D Queensland Alliance for Mental Health, 1/78 Logan Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia. Email: mwilson@qldalliance.org.au

E School of Health and Human Services, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia. Email: k.j.burke@cqu.edu.au

F Gaskin Research, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: b.happell@cqu.edu.au

Australian Health Review 38(2) 202-207 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13208
Submitted: 30 October 2013  Accepted: 15 January 2014   Published: 3 April 2014

Abstract

Objective Non-government organisations make a substantial contribution to the provision of mental health services; despite this, there has been little research and evaluation targeted at understanding the role played by these services within the community mental health sector. The aim of the present study was to examine the depth and breadth of services offered by these organisations in south-east Queensland, Australia, across five key aspects of reach and delivery.

Methods Representatives from 52 purposively targeted non-government organisations providing mental health services to individuals with significant mental health challenges were interviewed regarding their approach to mental health service provision.

Results The findings indicated a diverse pattern of service frameworks across the sector. The results also suggested a positive approach to the inclusion of consumer participation within the organisations, with most services reporting, at the very least, some form of consumer advocacy within their processes and as part of their services.

Conclusions This paper offers an important first look at the nature of non-government service provision within the mental health sector and highlights the importance of these organisations within the community sector.

What is known about the topic? Non-government organisations make a substantial contribution to the multisectorial provision of services to mental health consumers in community settings. Non-government organisations in Australia are well established, with 79.9% of them being in operation for over 10 years. There is an increasing expectation that consumers influence the development, delivery and evaluation of mental health services, especially in the community sector.

What does this paper add? This paper provides a profile of non-government organisations in one state in Australia with respect to the services they provide, the consumers they target, the practice frameworks they use, the use of peer workers and consumer participation, the success they have had with obtaining funding and the extent to which they collaborate with other services.

What are the implications for practitioners? This paper provides readers with an understanding of the non-government organisations and the services they provide to people with mental health conditions. In addition, the findings provide an opportunity to learn from the experience of non-government organisations in implementing consumer participation initiatives.

Additional keywords: consumer participation, peer support.


References

[1]  Hamden A, Newton R, McCauley-Elsom K, Cross W. Is deinstitutionalization working in our community? Int J Ment Health Nurs 2011; 20 274–83.
Is deinstitutionalization working in our community?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21450048PubMed |

[2]  Eaton J, Patel V. A movement for global mental health. Afr J Psychiatry 2009; 12 1–3. [Editorial]
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MvhtVKjsQ%3D%3D&md5=abd72e17a9ecb3b5d140f900f95ae1e8CAS |

[3]  Siriwanarangsan P, Liknapichitkul D, Khandelwal SK. Thailand mental health country profile. Int Rev Psychiatry 2004; 16 150–8.
Thailand mental health country profile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15276947PubMed |

[4]  Patel V, Thara R, editors. Meeting the mental health needs of developing countries: NGO innovations in India. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.

[5]  National Health Workforce Planning and Research Collaboration. Mental health non-government organisation workforce project final report. Adelaide, SA: Health Workforce Australia; 2011.

[6]  Australian Health Ministers. National mental health policy 2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.

[7]  Commonwealth of Australia. National practice standards for the mental health workforce. Canberra: Australian Government; 2002.

[8]  Commonwealth of Australia. National standards for mental health services. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[9]  Commonwealth of Australia. The roadmap for national mental health reform. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia 2012.

[10]  Bennetts W, Cross W, Bloomer M. Understanding consumer participation in mental health: issues of power and change. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2011; 20 155–64.
Understanding consumer participation in mental health: issues of power and change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21492356PubMed |

[11]  Monson K, Thurley M. Consumer participation in a youth mental health service. Early Interv Psychiatry 2011; 5 381–8.
Consumer participation in a youth mental health service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22032552PubMed |

[12]  Kleintjes S, Lund C, Swartz L, Flisher A. The MHAPP Research Programme C. Mental health care user participation in mental health policy development and implementation in South Africa. Int Rev Psychiatry 2010; 22 568–77.
The MHAPP Research Programme C. Mental health care user participation in mental health policy development and implementation in South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21226645PubMed |

[13]  Commonwealth of Australia. Fourth national mental health plan: an agenda for collaborative government action in mental health 2009–2014. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.

[14]  Siskind D, Harris M, Buckingham B, Pirkis J, Whiteford H. Planning estimates for the mental health community support sector. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2012; 46 569–80.
Planning estimates for the mental health community support sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22446978PubMed |

[15]  Knapp M, Beecham J, McDaid D, Matosevic T, Smith M. The economic consequences of deinstitutionalisation of mental health services: lessons from a systematic review of European experience. Health Soc Care Community 2011; 19 113–25.
| 21143545PubMed |

[16]  Happell B. Polarisation and political correctness: subtle barriers to consumer participation in mental health services. Advances in Mental Health 2008; 7

[17]  Goodwin V, Happell B. Psychiatric nurses’ attitudes toward consumer and carer participation in care: part 2. Barriers to participation. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2008; 9 249–56.
Psychiatric nurses’ attitudes toward consumer and carer participation in care: part 2. Barriers to participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18458098PubMed |

[18]  Meehan T, Bergen H, Coveney C, Thornton R. Development and evaluation of a training program in peer support for former consumers. Int J Mental Health Nursing 2002; 11 34–9.
Development and evaluation of a training program in peer support for former consumers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |