Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The future healthcare?

Kate Charlesworth A B , Maggie Jamieson A , Colin D. Butler A and Rachel Davey A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Locked Bag 1, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: maggie.jamieson@canberra.edu.au; colin.butler@canberra.edu.au; rachel.davey@canberra.edu.au

B Corresponding author. Email: u3112211@uni.canberra.edu.au

Australian Health Review 39(4) 444-447 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14243
Submitted: 10 December 2014  Accepted: 4 February 2015   Published: 30 March 2015

Abstract

Background Healthcare systems in Australia and around the world are failing to address the challenges of the modern world. Healthcare leaders are calling for radical, transformational change and entirely new systems of care. However it is unclear what a future, sustainable healthcare system would look like.

Methods A narrative review to examine emerging trends in health and social care was conducted.

Results and Conclusions Six key trends were identified. Collectively, they suggest that future systems are likely to be characterised by increasingly sophisticated technology, but at the same time greater personal and community responsibility for health and well being, innovative use of social capital, and a new approach to ageing and end-of-life care.

What is known about the topic? Health care systems in Australia and around the world are failing to address the key health challenges of modern society. There are calls for radical, transformational change of our health care systems; however it is unclear what a future, sustainable system would look like.

What does this paper add? In this narrative review, we identify and examine six key emerging trends in health and social care. Collectively, these trends suggest that future systems are likely to be characterised by increasingly sophisticated technology; but at the same time greater personal and community responsibility for health and well-being, innovative use of social capital, and a new approach to ageing and end-of-life-care.

What are the implications for practitioners? It is becoming increasingly clear that radical change is necessary and there are emerging examples of novel and creative initiatives across many areas of practice. Practitioners need to be engaged in, contributing to and in some cases, leading, this transition to a new health and social care system.


References

[1]  Hanlon P, Carlisle S, Hannah M, et al. The Future Public Health. United Kingdom: Open University Press; 2012.

[2]  Schroeder K, Thompson T, Frith K, et al. Sustainable healthcare. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books; 2012.

[3]  Ratnanesan A, Howarth P. Future solutions in Australian healthcare – white paper: innovative ideas and strategies for sustainable healthcare. Sydney: Energesse; 2014.

[4]  Glasziou P, Moynihan R, Richards T, Godlee F. Too much medicine; too little care. BMJ 2013; 347 f4247
Too much medicine; too little care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23820022PubMed |

[5]  Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA 2012; 307 1801–2.
Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xms1ajtLk%3D&md5=b9477b383a68971aade6089238511b69CAS | 22492759PubMed |

[6]  Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Patients’ preferences matter: stop the silent misdiagnosis. London: The King’s Fund; 2012: 52.

[7]  All Party Parliamentary Groups (APPG) on Global Health; HIV/AIDS; Population, Development & Reproductive Health; Global Tuberculosis; and Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care. Patient empowerment: for better quality, more sustainable health services globally. London: APPG on Global Health; HIV/AIDS; Population, Development & Reproductive Health; Global Tuberculosis; and Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care; 2014.

[8]  Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 2010; 341 c5146
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20947577PubMed |

[9]  Dods S, Hansen D, Boyle J, O’Keefe C, Alem A, Celler B, Freyne J, Kanagasingam Y. A digitally-enabled health system. Melbourne: CSIRO Australia; 2014.

[10]  McLean S, Protti D, Sheikh A. Telehealthcare for long term conditions. BMJ 2011; 342 d120
Telehealthcare for long term conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21292710PubMed |

[11]  Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients. BMJ 2007; 335 24–7.
Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17615222PubMed |

[12]  Davies P. Should patients be able to control their own records? BMJ 2012; 345 e4905
Should patients be able to control their own records?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22846414PubMed |

[13]  The Economist. The quantified self: counting every moment. The Economist; 3 March 2012; (Technology Quarterly: Q1 2012). http://www.economist.com/node/21548493 [verified 28 July 2014].

[14]  Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6 492–525.
Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19440396PubMed |

[15]  Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster; 2000.

[16]  Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D. Can we improve our physical health by altering our social networks? Perspect Psychol Sci 2009; 4 375–8.
Can we improve our physical health by altering our social networks?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20161087PubMed |

[17]  Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109 186–204.
| 1:STN:280:DyaE1M7kt1CisQ%3D%3D&md5=754b6bb987fa12f63abe381f663e82fbCAS | 425958PubMed |

[18]  Glasgow Centre for Population Health. Towards asset-based health and care services: Concepts Series. Glasgow: Centre for Population Health; 2014.

[19]  Oliver D, Foot C, Humphries R. Making our health and care systems fit for an ageing population. London: The Kings Fund; 2014.

[20]  McNeil C, Hunter J. The generation strain: collective solutions to care in an ageing society. The Condition of Britain. London: Institute for Public Policy Research; 2014.

[21]  British National Audit Office. Adult social care in England: overview. London: National Audit Office; 2014.

[22]  Scott IA, Mitchell GK, Reymond EJ, Daly MP. Difficult but necessary conversations – the case for advance care planning. Med J Aust 2013; 199 662–6.
Difficult but necessary conversations – the case for advance care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24237095PubMed |

[23]  Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, Mack JW, Trice E, Balboni T, Mitchell SL, Jackson VA, Block SD, Maciejewski PK, Prigerson HG. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008; 300 1665–73.
Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ejsrjI&md5=8cdf54ba7bc166971e8b0e03b700bc5cCAS | 18840840PubMed |