Parental preferences for paediatric specialty follow-up careMarina Kunin A , Erin Turbitt A , Sarah A. Gafforini A , Lena A. Sanci B , Neil A. Spike B and Gary L. Freed A C
A Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia. Email: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
C Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Australian Health Review - https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16062
Submitted: 7 March 2016 Accepted: 6 June 2016 Published online: 22 July 2016
Objective The aim of the present study was to examine factors associated with: (1) parental preference to receive follow-up care for their child from a general practitioner (GP); and (2) a decision to seek treatment when there is a slight worsening of their child’s condition.
Methods Parents presenting with their child at any one of five paediatric out-patient clinics at two public hospitals in Melbourne (Vic., Australia) were surveyed. We performed frequency distributions, bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate associations with the preference for a GP for follow-up care and treatment in case of a slight worsening.
Results In all, 606 parents were recruited to the study, 283 being new presentations and 323 presenting for review. GPs were selected as the preference for follow-up care by 23% (n = 142) of respondents, and 26% (n = 160) reported they would seek treatment from a GP if the condition of their child were to worsen slightly. There was an increased likelihood to prefer a GP for follow-up care for new patients (odds ratio (OR) 3.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99–4.83), those attending general paediatrics clinic (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.11–2.70), and parents with a lower level of education (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.09–2.78). For review patients, if during the previous visit a paediatrician suggested follow-up with a GP, parents were more likely to prefer a GP as a follow-up provider (OR 6.70; 95% CI 3.42–13.10) and to seek treatment from a GP in case of a slight worsening (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.03–3.37).
Conclusion Most parents attending paediatric out-patient appointments prefer to return for follow-up care; however, a paediatrician’s advice may have an important role in return of paediatric patients to primary care.
What is known about the topic? In Australia, there has been a growing concern regarding long waiting times for specialist consultations in out-patient clinics and difficulties with access for new patients. This has occurred when the ratio of review attendees to new patients has tipped towards the review attendees.
What does this paper add? Most parents of children attending paediatric out-patient clinics value follow-up care with paediatric specialists, even if the referring GP requested a return to their surgery. The advice of the consulting paediatrician in support of follow-up care with a GP contributes significantly to the willingness of parents to return to primary care and to seek treatment from their GP for a slight worsening of their child’s condition.
What are the implications for practitioners? The findings of the present study have significant implications for the discharge of patients from speciality care: paediatricians can have an important role in the return of paediatric patients to primary care.
References Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Bishop M, Peugh J, Murukutla N. Toward higher-performance health systems: adults’ health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff 2007; 26 w717–34.
| Toward higher-performance health systems: adults’ health care experiences in seven countries, 2007.CrossRef |
 Quach J, Barnett T. Impact of chronic illness timing and persistence at school entry on child and parent outcomes: Australian longitudinal study. Acad Pediatr 2015; 15 89–95.
| Impact of chronic illness timing and persistence at school entry on child and parent outcomes: Australian longitudinal study.CrossRef | 25444652PubMed |
 Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ 1995; 311 1447–8.
| Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fps1eksg%3D%3D&md5=26b494ea8781f3f2d38b13490d3149dfCAS | 8520313PubMed |
 Szecsenyi J. Improving care at the primary-secondary care interface: a difficult but essential task. Qual Health Care 1996; 5 191–2.
| Improving care at the primary-secondary care interface: a difficult but essential task.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7mt1SlsA%3D%3D&md5=08786c9cffd5755f740d6620d04f6cbbCAS | 10164141PubMed |
 Dodd KL, Rhead S, Towey K. Paediatric medical outpatients: are all those reviews necessary? Arch Dis Child 1994; 70 493–6.
| Paediatric medical outpatients: are all those reviews necessary?CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czisVyhsQ%3D%3D&md5=32de282aacc615a7c88c9ad3b2d09fb2CAS | 8048818PubMed |
 Thind A, Stewart M, Manuel D, Freeman T, Terry A, Chevendra V, Maddocks H, Marshall N. What are wait times to see a specialist? An analysis of 26,942 referrals in Southwestern Ontario. Healthc Policy 2012; 8 80–91.
| 23968605PubMed |
 Hughes ML, Leslie SJ, McInnes GK, McCormac K, Peden NR. Can we see more outpatients without more doctors? J R Soc Med 2003; 96 333–7.
| Can we see more outpatients without more doctors?CrossRef | 12835445PubMed |
 Donnellan F, Hussain T, Aftab AR, McGurk C. Reducing unnecessary outpatient attendances. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2010; 23 527–31.
| Reducing unnecessary outpatient attendances.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfivFKqtA%3D%3D&md5=1cfe5424af16bac64cbcc053ef38e90cCAS | 20845682PubMed |
 Findlay H, Hallett K, Sivakumar A, Simmons D. Which patients with type 2 diabetes attend secondary care clinics? Practical Diabetes 2013; 30 190–3.
| Which patients with type 2 diabetes attend secondary care clinics?CrossRef |
 Kemp K, Griffiths J, Campbell S, Lovell K. An exploration of the follow-up up needs of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 2013; 7 e386–95.
| An exploration of the follow-up up needs of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.CrossRef |
 Miedema B, MacDonald I, Tatemichi S. Cancer follow-up care: patients’ perspective. Can Fam Physician 2003; 49 890–5.
| 12901486PubMed |
 Adewuyi-Dalton R, Ziebland S, Grunfeld E, Hall A. Patients’ views of routine hospital follow-up: a qualitative study of women with breast cancer in remission. Psychooncology 1998; 7 436–9.
| Patients’ views of routine hospital follow-up: a qualitative study of women with breast cancer in remission.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fis1ylsA%3D%3D&md5=4ee71e497bc1bb4182fb17ab55f925c8CAS | 9809334PubMed |
 Burkey Y, Black M, Reeve H. Patients’ views on their discharge from follow up in outpatient clinics: qualitative study. BMJ 1997; 315 1138–41.
| Patients’ views on their discharge from follow up in outpatient clinics: qualitative study.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fkt1ejsA%3D%3D&md5=78ae9f7090b248a0cd4e8edee907bda8CAS | 9374889PubMed |
 Miller MR, Forrest CB, Kan JS. Parental preferences for primary and specialty care collaboration in the management of teenagers with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2000; 106 264–9.
| Parental preferences for primary and specialty care collaboration in the management of teenagers with congenital heart disease.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhsFWitA%3D%3D&md5=5e5c62e751ca1d5e3304636b6c5da8dcCAS | 10920149PubMed |
 Earle EA, Davies H, Greenfield D, Ross R, Eiser C. Follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: a focus group analysis. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41 2882–6.
| Follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: a focus group analysis.CrossRef | 16275059PubMed |
 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 377–81.
| Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.CrossRef | 18929686PubMed |
 Sofaer S, Firminger K. Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annu Rev Public Health 2005; 26 513–59.
| Patient perceptions of the quality of health services.CrossRef | 15760300PubMed |
 Burkey Y, Black M, Reeve H, Roland M. Long-term follow-up in outpatient clinics. 2: The view from the specialist clinic. Fam Pract 1997; 14 29–33.
| Long-term follow-up in outpatient clinics. 2: The view from the specialist clinic.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3hsV2ktA%3D%3D&md5=38b3d8acb7ea86069fd798d6e67fae7aCAS | 9061341PubMed |
 Oberklaid F. Australian paediatricians and the new morbidity: a national survey of changing paediatric practice patterns. Aust Paediatr J 1988; 24 5–9.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7otlWnsw%3D%3D&md5=44f9eea5ef27febcd5be64a657d7b6a2CAS | 2451498PubMed |
 Hiscock H, Roberts G, Efron D, Sewell JR, Bryson HE, Price AMH, Oberklaid F, South M, Wake MA. Children attending paediatricians study: a national prospective audit of outpatient practice from the Australian paediatric research network. Med J Aust 2011; 194 392–7.
| 21495938PubMed |
 Pileggi C, Carbone V, Pavia M, Angelillo IF. Patients’ perceptions and related behaviours on role of primary care physician in Italy. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14 258–60.
| Patients’ perceptions and related behaviours on role of primary care physician in Italy.CrossRef | 15369030PubMed |