Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Systematic review of the evidence related to mandated nurse staffing ratios in acute hospitals

Richard Olley A B , Ian Edwards A , Mark Avery A and Helen Cooper A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Health Services Management, School of Medicine, Griffith University, PO Box 3370, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia. Email: ian.edwards@griffith.edu.au; m.avery@griffith.edu.au; h.cooper@griffith.edu.au

B Corresponding author. Email: r.olley@griffith.edu.au

Australian Health Review 43(3) 288-293 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16252
Submitted: 15 November 2016  Accepted: 1 December 2017   Published: 17 April 2018

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and summarise available research on nurse staffing methods and relate these to outcomes under three overarching themes of: (1) management of clinical risk, quality and safety; (2) development of a new or innovative staffing methodology; and (3) equity of nursing workload.

Methods The PRISMA method was used. Relevant articles were located by searching via the Griffith University Library electronic catalogue, including articles on PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Medline. Only English language publications published between 1 January 2010 and 30 April 2016 focusing on methodologies in acute hospital in-patient units were included in the present review.

Results Two of the four staffing methods were found to have evidenced-based articles from empirical studies within the parameters set for inclusion. Of the four staffing methodologies searched, supply and demand returned 10 studies and staffing ratios returned 11.

Conclusions There is a need to develop an evidence-based nurse-sensitive outcomes measure upon which staffing for safety, quality and workplace equity, as well as an instrument that reliability and validly projects nurse staffing requirements in a variety of clinical settings. Nurse-sensitive indicators reflect elements of patient care that are directly affected by nursing practice In addition, these measures must take into account patient satisfaction, workload and staffing, clinical risks and other measures of the quality and safety of care and nurses’ work satisfaction. i.

What is known about the topic? Nurse staffing is a controversial topic that has significant patient safety, quality of care, human resources and financial implications. In acute care services, nursing accounts for approximately 70% of salaries and wages paid by health services budgets, and evidence as to the efficacy and effectiveness of any staffing methodology is required because it has workforce and industrial relations implications. Although there is significant literature available on the topic, there is a paucity of empirical evidence supporting claims of increased patient safety in the acute hospital setting, but some evidence exists relating to equity of workload for nurses.

What does this paper add? This paper provides a contemporary qualitative analysis of empirical evidence using PRISMA methodology to conduct a systematic review of the available literature. It demonstrates a significant research gap to support claims of increased patient safety in the acute hospital setting. The paper calls for greatly improved datasets upon which research can be undertaken to determine any associations between mandated patient to nurse ratios and other staffing methodologies and patient safety and quality of care.

What are the implications for practitioners? There is insufficient contemporary research to support staffing methodologies for appropriate staffing, balanced workloads and quality, safe care. Such research would include the establishment of nurse-sensitive patient outcomes measures, and more robust datasets are needed for empirical analysis to produce such evidence.

Additional keywords: clinical risk, nurse scheduling, nurse rostering, nurse staffing, nursing quality, patient safety, staffing equity, staffing method.


References

[1]  Doyle SA. ICN adopts new definition of nurse. AORN J 1976; 23 165–6.
ICN adopts new definition of nurse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Burnes Bolton L, Aydin C, Donaldson N, Brown DS, Sandhu M, Fridman M, Aronow HU. Mandated nurse staffing ratios in California: a comparison of staffing and nursing-sensitive outcomes pre- and postregulation. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2007; 8 238–50.
Mandated nurse staffing ratios in California: a comparison of staffing and nursing-sensitive outcomes pre- and postregulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  American Nurses Association. Nurse staffing. 2015. Available at: http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Policy-Advocacy/State/Legislative-Agenda-Reports/State-StaffingPlansRatios [verified 2 March 2018].

[4]  Gerdtz MF, Nelson S. 5–20: a model of minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in Victoria, Australia. J Nurs Manag 2007; 15 64–71.
5–20: a model of minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FhtFCrtQ%3D%3D&md5=865a5195d0b4873baf8c64e622c5b4efCAS |

[5]  Queensland Government. Nurse to patient ratio legislation introduced. [Media statement] Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2015. Available at: http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2015/12/1/nurse-to-patient-ratio-legislation-introduced [verified 2 March 2018].

[6]  Buchan J. A certain ratio? The policy implications of minimum staffing ratios in nursing. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10 239–44.
A certain ratio? The policy implications of minimum staffing ratios in nursing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Welton JM. Mandatory hospital nurse to patient staffing ratios: time to take a different approach. Online J Issues Nurs 2007; 12 1
Mandatory hospital nurse to patient staffing ratios: time to take a different approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Tevington P. Mandatory nurse–patient ratios. Medsurg Nurs 2011; 20 265–8.

[9]  Australian Resource Centre for Hospital Innovation Safe staffing and patient safety literature review. Final report – 31 January 2003. Canberra: Australian Council for Quality and Safety in Health Care; 2003. Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/s_staflitrev.pdf [verified 2 March 2018]

[10]  Brennan CW, Daly B, Jones K. State of the science: the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. West J Nurs Res 2013; 35 760–94.
State of the science: the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Chiaramonte MV, Chiaramonte LM. An agent-based nurse rostering system under minimal staffing conditions. Int J Prod Econ 2008; 114 697–713.
An agent-based nurse rostering system under minimal staffing conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Maenhout B, Vanhoucke M. The impact of incorporating nurse-specific characteristics in a cyclical scheduling approach. J Oper Res Soc 2009; 60 1683–98.
The impact of incorporating nurse-specific characteristics in a cyclical scheduling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Maenhout B, Vanhoucke M. An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems. Omega 2013; 41 485–99.
An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Tsai C-C, Li SHA. A two-stage modeling with genetic algorithms for the nurse scheduling problem. Expert Syst Appl 2009; 36 9506–12.
A two-stage modeling with genetic algorithms for the nurse scheduling problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Gray J, Kerfoot K. Expanding the parameters for excellence in patient assignments: is leveraging an evidence-data-based acuity methodology realistic? Nurs Adm Q 2016; 40 7–13.
Expanding the parameters for excellence in patient assignments: is leveraging an evidence-data-based acuity methodology realistic?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Marcinko D, Hetico H. Hospitals & health care organizations: management strategies, operational techniques, tools, templates, and case studies. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.

[17]  Wagner KD, Johnson KL, Hardin-Pierce MG. High-acuity nursing. Boston: Pearson; 2010.

[18]  Robinson CH, Annis AM, Forman J, Krein SL, Yankey N, Duffy SA, Taylor B, Sales AE. Factors that affect implementation of a nurse staffing directive: results from a qualitative multi-case evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72 1886–98.
Factors that affect implementation of a nurse staffing directive: results from a qualitative multi-case evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Adams J, Kaplow R, Dominy J, Stroud B. Beyond a band-aid approach: an internal agency solution to nurse staffing. Nurs Econ 2015; 33 51–8.

[20]  Insitute of Medicine. Keeping patients safe: transforming the work environment of nurses. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

[21]  Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 1006–12.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Pappas S, Davidson N, Woodard J, Davis J, Welton JM. Risk-adjusted staffing to improve patient value. Nurs Econ 2015; 33 73–8.

[23]  Unruh LY, Zhang NJ. Nurse staffing and patient safety in hospitals: new variable and longitudinal approaches. Nurs Res 2012; 61 3–12.
Nurse staffing and patient safety in hospitals: new variable and longitudinal approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Smeds Alenius L, Tishelman C, Runesdotter S, Lindqvist R. Staffing and resource adequacy strongly related to RNs’ assessment of patient safety: a national study of RNs working in acute-care hospitals in Sweden. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 242–9.
Staffing and resource adequacy strongly related to RNs’ assessment of patient safety: a national study of RNs working in acute-care hospitals in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Rogowski JA, Staiger DO, Patrick TE, Horbar JD, Kenny MJ, Lake ET. Nurse staffing in neonatal intensive care units in the United States. Res Nurs Health 2015; 38 333–41.
Nurse staffing in neonatal intensive care units in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Mefford LC, Alligood MR. Evaluating nurse staffing patterns and neonatal intensive care unit outcomes using Levine’s conservation model of nursing. J Nurs Manag 2011; 19 998–1011.
Evaluating nurse staffing patterns and neonatal intensive care unit outcomes using Levine’s conservation model of nursing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Cook A, Gaynor M, Stephens M, Taylor L. The effect of a hospital nurse staffing mandate on patient health outcomes: evidence from California’s minimum staffing regulation. J Health Econ 2012; 31 340–8.
The effect of a hospital nurse staffing mandate on patient health outcomes: evidence from California’s minimum staffing regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  McHugh MD, Brooks Carthon M, Sloane DM, Wu E, Kelly L, Aiken LH. Impact of nurse staffing mandates on safety-net hospitals: lessons from California. Milbank Q 2012; 90 160–86.
Impact of nurse staffing mandates on safety-net hospitals: lessons from California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Patrician PA, Loan L, McCarthy M, Brosch LR, Davey KS. Towards evidence‐based management: creating an informative database of nursing‐sensitive indicators. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010; 42 358–66.
Towards evidence‐based management: creating an informative database of nursing‐sensitive indicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Sherenian M, Profit J, Schmidt B, Suh S, Xiao R, Zupancic JAF, DeMauro SB. Nurse-to-patient ratios and neonatal outcomes: a brief systematic review. Neonatology 2013; 104 179–83.
Nurse-to-patient ratios and neonatal outcomes: a brief systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31]  Gräff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Klockner S, Erdfelder F, Schiefer JL, Grigutsch D. Nurse staffing calculation in the emergency department – performance-oriented calculation based on the Manchester Triage System at the University Hospital Bonn. PLoS One 2016; 11 e0154344
Nurse staffing calculation in the emergency department – performance-oriented calculation based on the Manchester Triage System at the University Hospital Bonn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Kortbeek N, Braaksma A, Burger CAJ, Bakker PJM, Boucherie RJ. Flexible nurse staffing based on hourly bed census predictions. Int J Prod Econ 2015; 161 167–80.
Flexible nurse staffing based on hourly bed census predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Twigg DE, Cramer JH, Pugh JD. Nurse staffing and workload drivers in small rural hospitals: an imperative for evidence. Online J Rural Nurs Health Care 2016; 16 97–121.
Nurse staffing and workload drivers in small rural hospitals: an imperative for evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Diaz D, Erkoc M, Asfour S, Baker E. New ways of thinking about nurse scheduling. J Adv Manag Res 2010; 7 76–93.
New ways of thinking about nurse scheduling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Jones T, Heui Bae S, Murry N, Hamilton P. Texas nurse staffing trends before and after mandated nurse staffing committees. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2015; 16 79–96.
Texas nurse staffing trends before and after mandated nurse staffing committees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Hayes N, Ball J. Achieving safe staffing for older people in hospital. Nurs Older People 2012; 24 20–4.
Achieving safe staffing for older people in hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  McNair DS. Enhancing nursing staffing forecasting with safety stock over lead time modeling. Nurs Adm Q 2015; 39 291–6.
Enhancing nursing staffing forecasting with safety stock over lead time modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Hoi SY, Ismail N, Ong LC, Kang J. Determining nurse staffing needs: the workload intensity measurement system. J Nurs Manag 2010; 18 44–53.
Determining nurse staffing needs: the workload intensity measurement system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Harding T, Wright M. Unequal staffing: a snapshot of nurse staffing in critical care units in New South Wales, Australia. Contemp Nurse 2014; 47 7–15.

[40]  Park SH, Blegen MA, Spetz J, Chapman S, De Groot HA. Comparison of nurse staffing measurements in staffing-outcomes research. Med Care 2015; 53 e1–8.
Comparison of nurse staffing measurements in staffing-outcomes research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Griffiths P, Busse R, Diomidous M, Kinnunen J, Kózka M, Lesaffre E, McHugh MD, Moreno-Casbas MT, Rafferty AM, Schwendimann R, Scott PA, Tishelman C, van Achterberg T, Sermeus W. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet 2014; 383 1824–30.
Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  Ball J, Catton H. Planning nurse staffing: are we willing and able? J Res Nurs 2011; 16 551–8.
Planning nurse staffing: are we willing and able?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Dubois C-A, D’Amour D, Tchouaket E, Clarke S, Rivard M, Blais R. Associations of patient safety outcomes with models of nursing care organization at unit level in hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25 110–7.
Associations of patient safety outcomes with models of nursing care organization at unit level in hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |