Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Are koalas detected more effectively by systematic spotlighting or diurnal searches?

Lachlan Wilmott A D , Dympna Cullen B , George Madani C , Martin Krogh A and Kylie Madden A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box 513, Wollongong, NSW 2520, Australia.

B PMB 146, Alice Springs, NT, Australia.

C PO Box 3113, Hilltop, NSW 2575, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Lachlan.wilmott@environment.nsw.gov.au

Australian Mammalogy 41(1) 157-160 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM18006
Submitted: 26 June 2017  Accepted: 4 May 2018   Published: 7 June 2018

Abstract

Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are difficult to detect due to their cryptic nature, occurrence at low densities and broad distribution. We compare the relative effectiveness of two common, direct survey techniques used to detect koalas: spotlighting and diurnal searches. Seventy-six 2-ha sites were surveyed using both spotlighting and diurnal searching. Each site was surveyed for 0.5 person-hours, such that search area and effort were equal. In this study, spotlighting was found to be 3.25 times more effective at detecting koalas than day searches. Therefore, where access and terrain allows, spotlighting surveys offer a significant advantage over diurnal searches in the detection of koalas.

Additional keywords: fauna monitoring, Metropolitan Special Area, Phascolarctos cinereus, survey, Upper Nepean State Conservation Area.


References

Catling, P. C., Burt, R. J., and Kooyman, R. (1997). A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Research 24, 417–432.
A comparison of techniques used in a survey of the ground-dwelling and arboreal mammals in forests in north-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cristescu, R. H., Goethals, K., Banks, P. B., Carrick, F. N., and Frere, C. (2012). Experimental evaluation of koala scat persistence and detectability with implications for pellet-based fauna census. International Journal of Zoology 2012, 631856.
Experimental evaluation of koala scat persistence and detectability with implications for pellet-based fauna census.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dique, D. S., de Villiers, D. L., and Preece, H. J. (2003). Evaluation of line-transect sampling for estimating koala abundance in the Pine Rivers Shire, south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research 30, 127–133.
Evaluation of line-transect sampling for estimating koala abundance in the Pine Rivers Shire, south-east Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dique, D. S., Preece, H. J., Thompson, J., and de Villiers, D. L. (2004). Determining the distribution and abundance of a regional koala population in south-east Queensland for conservation management. Wildlife Research 31, 109–117.
Determining the distribution and abundance of a regional koala population in south-east Queensland for conservation management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edwards, G. P., Dobbie, W., and Berman, D. M. (2002). Population trends in European rabbits and other wildlife of central Australia in the wake of rabbit haemorrhagic disease. Wildlife Research 29, 557–565.
Population trends in European rabbits and other wildlife of central Australia in the wake of rabbit haemorrhagic disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Focardi, S., De Marinis, A. M., Rizzotto, M., and Pucci, A. (2001). Comparative evaluation of thermal infrared imaging and spotlighting to survey wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 133–139.

Goldingay, R. L., and Sharpe, D. J. (2004). How effective is spotlighting for detecting the squirrel glider? Wildlife Research 31, 443–449.
How effective is spotlighting for detecting the squirrel glider?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Halekoh, U., and Højsgaard, S. (2014). A Kenward–Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – the R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software 59, 1–30.
A Kenward–Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – the R package pbkrtest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jurskis, V., Douch, A., McCray, K., and Shields, J. (2001). A playback survey of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, and a review of its distribution in the Eden Region of south-eastern New South Wales. Australian Forestry 64, 226–231.
A playback survey of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, and a review of its distribution in the Eden Region of south-eastern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kavanagh, R. P., and Stanton, M. A. (2012). Koalas use young Eucalyptus plantations in an agricultural landscape on the Liverpool Plains, New South Wales. Ecological Management & Restoration 13, 297–305.
Koalas use young Eucalyptus plantations in an agricultural landscape on the Liverpool Plains, New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Law, B., Caccamo, G., Roe, P., Truskinger, A., Brassil, T., Gonsalves, L., McConville, A., and Stanton, M. (2017). Development and field validation of a regional, management‐scale habitat model: a koala Phascolarctos cinereus case study. Ecology and Evolution 7, 7475–7489.
Development and field validation of a regional, management‐scale habitat model: a koala Phascolarctos cinereus case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Donnelly, C. F., Incoll, R. D., Pope, M. L., Tribolet, C. R., Viggers, K. L., and Welsh, A. H. (2001). How effective is spotlighting for detecting the greater glider (Petauroides volans)? Wildlife Research 28, 105–109.
How effective is spotlighting for detecting the greater glider (Petauroides volans)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lunney, D., Predavec, M., Sonawane, I., Kavanagh, R., Barrott-Brown, G., Phillips, S., Callaghan, J., Mitchell, D., Parnaby, H., Paull, D. C., Shannon, I., Ellis, M., Price, O., and Milledge, D. (2017). The remaining koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) of the Pilliga forests, north-west New South Wales: refugial persistence or a population on the road to extinction? Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 277–294.
The remaining koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) of the Pilliga forests, north-west New South Wales: refugial persistence or a population on the road to extinction?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Melzer, A., and Lamb, D. (1994). Low density populations of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in central Queensland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 104, 89–93.

Natural Resources Management Ministerial Council (2009). National koala conservation and management strategy 2009–2014. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra.

Paull, D. J., Claridge, A. W., and Cunningham, R. B. (2012). Effective detection methods for medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals: a comparison between infrared digital cameras and hair tunnels. Wildlife Research 39, 546–553.

Phillips, S., and Callaghan, J. (2011). The Spot Assessment Technique: a tool for determining localised levels of habitat use by koalas Phascolarctos cinereus. Australian Zoologist 35, 774–780.
The Spot Assessment Technique: a tool for determining localised levels of habitat use by koalas Phascolarctos cinereus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plumptre, A. J. (2000). Monitoring mammal populations with line transect techniques in African forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 356–368.
Monitoring mammal populations with line transect techniques in African forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/

Sinclair, A. R. E., Fryxell, J. M., and Caughley, G. (2006). ‘Wildlife Ecology, Conservation, and Management.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.)

Smith, A. P. (2004). Koala conservation and habitat requirements in a timber production forest in north-east New South Wales. In ‘Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna’. (Ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 591–611. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Stephens, P. A., Zaumyslova, O. Y., Miquelle, D. G., Myslenkov, A. I., and Hayward, G. D. (2006). Estimating population density from indirect sign: track counts and the Formozov–Malyshev–Pereleshin formula. Animal Conservation 9, 339–348.
Estimating population density from indirect sign: track counts and the Formozov–Malyshev–Pereleshin formula.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson, W. (2004). ‘Sampling Rare or Elusive Species.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Vine, S. J., Crowther, M. S., Lapidge, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M. P., and English, A. W. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436–446.
Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ward, S. J. (2000). The efficacy of nestboxes versus spotlighting for detecting feathertail gliders. Wildlife Research 27, 75–79.
The efficacy of nestboxes versus spotlighting for detecting feathertail gliders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |