Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Diet selection by the brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) in East Gippsland, Victoria

Lily van Eeden A C , Julian Di Stefano B and Graeme Coulson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science and Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Water Street, Creswick, Vic. 3363, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: lilyvaneeden@hotmail.com

Australian Mammalogy 33(2) 162-168 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM10038
Submitted: 29 October 2010  Accepted: 24 June 2011   Published: 12 September 2011

Abstract

Resource selection by animals is assumed to have fitness benefits so quantifying resource selection can help determine suitable conditions for species persistence and be used to inform management plans. We studied diet selection by the ‘Critically Endangered’ Victorian brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Petrogale penicillata) by comparing proportions of plant functional groups consumed with their availability in the three remaining rock-wallaby colonies in East Gippsland, Victoria. We estimated availability using an adaptation of the point transect method, identifying 63 plant functional groups and their abundance within the foraging range. Using microhistological analysis of faecal pellets we determined diet composition at the resolution of plant functional groups: ferns, forbs, monocots, shrubs and trees. At all sites the plant functional groups constituting most of the diet were forbs, monocots and shrubs. However, diet composition and selection was different among the sites, particularly with regards to the consumption and selection of monocots, which appeared to be favoured at two sites, and of shrubs, which were favoured at the third site. Overall, the diet composition suggested that brush-tailed rock-wallabies consume a diverse range of food types. The results can be used to improve current management by increasing the availability of preferred food types, perhaps through targeted fire regimes, and to guide the selection of reintroduction sites.


References

ANZECC (1991). List of endangered vertebrate fauna. Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra.

Bohnham, C. D. (1989) ‘Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation.’ (Wiley Intersciences: New York.)

Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., and Gurung, M. (1999). The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. Journal of Mammalogy 80, 385–399.
The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Browning, T. L., Taggart, D. A., Rummery, C., Close, R. L., and Eldridge, M. D. B. (2001). Multifaceted genetic analysis of the “Critically Endangered” brush-tailed rock-wallaby Petrogale penicillata in Victoria: implications for management. Conservation Genetics 2, 145–156.
Multifaceted genetic analysis of the “Critically Endangered” brush-tailed rock-wallaby Petrogale penicillata in Victoria: implications for management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotFGgs74%3D&md5=de856fffa7dcd040c083a5dadefef988CAS |

Cabeza, M., Araújo, M. B., Wilson, R. J., Thomas, C. D., Cowley, M. J. R., and Moilanen, A. (2004). Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 252–262.
Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M. (2001). ‘Changes in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation.’ 2nd edn. (PRIMER-E: Plymouth, UK.)

Davis, N. E., Coulson, G., and Forsyth, D. M. (2008). Diets of native and introduced mammalian herbivores in shrub-encroached grassy woodland, south-eastern Australia. Wildlife Research 35, 684–694.
Diets of native and introduced mammalian herbivores in shrub-encroached grassy woodland, south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DCE (1992). Alpine National Park Cobberas–Tingaringy Unit Management Plan. Department of Conservation and Environment, Victoria.

Delaney, R., Temple-Smith, P., and McLean, N. (2005). Translocation strategy for the brush-tailed rock-wallaby in Victoria. Victorian Brush-tailed Rock-wallaby Recovery Team, the Department of Sustainability and Parks Victoria.

DSE (2007). Advisory List of Threatened Vertebrate Fauna in Victoria – 2007. Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne, Victoria.

Ecology Partners (2008). Vegetation monitoring of brush-tailed rock-wallaby habitat, East Gippsland, Victoria. Ecology Partners, Brunswick, Victoria.

Epps, C. W., McCullough, D. R., Wehausen, J. D., Bleich, V. C., and Rechel, J. L. (2004). Effects of climate change on population persistence of desert-dwelling mountain sheep in California. Conservation Biology 18, 102–113.
Effects of climate change on population persistence of desert-dwelling mountain sheep in California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fitzgerald, A. E., and Waddington, D. C. (1979). Comparison of two methods of faecal analysis of herbivore diet. Journal of Wildlife Management 43, 468–473.
Comparison of two methods of faecal analysis of herbivore diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freitas, C., Kovacs, K. M., Ims, R. A., and Lydersen, C. (2008). Predicting habitat use by ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in a warming Arctic. Ecological Modelling 217, 19–32.
Predicting habitat use by ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in a warming Arctic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garshelis, D. L. (2000). Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. In ‘Research Techniques in Animal Ecology’. (Eds L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller.) pp. 111–164. (Columbia University Press: New York.)

Hamilton, B. A., and Hall, D. G. (1975). Estimation of the botanical composition of oesophageal estrusa samples. 1. A modified microscope point technique. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 229–235.
Estimation of the botanical composition of oesophageal estrusa samples. 1. A modified microscope point technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holechek, T. L., Gross, B., Dabo, S. M., and Stephenson, T. (1982). Effects of sample preparation, growth stage, and observer on microhistological analysis of herbivore diets. Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 502–505.
Effects of sample preparation, growth stage, and observer on microhistological analysis of herbivore diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hood, G. M. (2009). PopTools Version 3.1.1 www.cse.csiro.au/poptools

Hubbard, S. F., Cook, R. M., Glover, J. G., and Greenwood, J. J. D. (1982). Apostatic selection as an optimal foraging strategy. Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 625–633.
Apostatic selection as an optimal foraging strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jarman, P. J., and Capararo, S. M. (1997). Use of rock-wallaby faecal pellets for detecting and monitoring populations and examining habitat use. Australian Mammalogy 19, 257–264.

Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, M. K., Wofford, H., and Pearson, H. A. (1983). Digestion and fragmentation: influence on herbivore diet analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 47, 877–879.
Digestion and fragmentation: influence on herbivore diet analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, C. J., Seip, D. R., and Boyce, M. S. (2004). A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 238–251.
A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lunney, D., Law, B., and Rummery, C. (1997). An ecological interpretation of the historical decline of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby, Petrogale penicillata, in NSW. Australian Mammalogy 19, 281–296.

Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., Thomas, D. L., McDonald, T. L., and Erickson, W. P. (2002). ‘Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

McLoughlin, P. D., Case, L. R., Gau, R. J., Cluff, H. D., Mulders, R., and Messier, F. (2002). Heirarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic. Oecologia 132, 102–108.
Heirarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen, S. E., Boyce, M. S., Stenhouse, G. B., and Munro, R. H. M. (2002). Modelling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus 13, 45–56.

Norbury, G. L. (1988). Microscopic analysis of herbivore diets – a problem and a solution. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 51–57.
Microscopic analysis of herbivore diets – a problem and a solution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsson, O., and Rogers, D. J. (2009). Predicting the distribution of a suitable habitat for the white stork in southern Sweden: identifying priority areas for reintroduction and habitat restoration. Animal Conservation 12, 62–70.
Predicting the distribution of a suitable habitat for the white stork in southern Sweden: identifying priority areas for reintroduction and habitat restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Owaga, M. L. A. (1978). Effect of sieve mesh size on analysis of rumen contents. Journal of Wildlife Management 42, 693–697.
Effect of sieve mesh size on analysis of rumen contents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Petrides, G. (1975). Principal foods versus preferred foods and their relations to stocking rate and range condition. Biological Conservation 7, 161–169.
Principal foods versus preferred foods and their relations to stocking rate and range condition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prober, S. M., and Thiele, K. L. (2005). Effects of the 2003 Bogong Complex fires on brush-tailed rock-wallaby habitat and Acacia doratoxylon scrubs in Little River Gorge, East Gippsland. Ecological Interactions, Melbourne.

Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Chamov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quarterly Review of Biology 52, 137–154.
Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schadt, S., Revilla, E., Weigand, T., Knauer, F., Kaczensky, P., Breitenmoser, O. R. S., Bufka, L., Cerveny, J., Koubek, P., Huber, T., Stanisa, C., and Trepl, L. (2002). Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of the Eurasian lynx. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 189–203.
Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of the Eurasian lynx.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schooley, R. L. (1994). Annual variation in habitat selection – patterns concealed by pooled data. Journal of Wildlife Management 58, 367–374.
Annual variation in habitat selection – patterns concealed by pooled data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, J. (1982). Habitat requirements of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby, Petrogale penicillata, in New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 239–246.
Habitat requirements of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby, Petrogale penicillata, in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, J. (1989). The diet of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby in New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 11–18.
The diet of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, J., and Milkovits, G. (1990). Distribution and status of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby in south-eastern Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 17, 169–179.
Distribution and status of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, A. D., and Shandruck, L. J. (1979). Comparison of faecal, rumen and utilization methods for ascertaining Pronghorn diets. Journal of Range Management 32, 275–279.
Comparison of faecal, rumen and utilization methods for ascertaining Pronghorn diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Strubbe, D., and Matthysen, E. (2009). Predicting the potential distribution of invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in northern Belgium using an ecological niche modelling approach. Biological Invasions 11, 497–513.
Predicting the potential distribution of invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in northern Belgium using an ecological niche modelling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas, D. L., and Taylor, E. J. (2006). Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. II. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 324–336.
Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. II.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Todd, J. W., and Hansen, R. M. (1973). Plant fragmentation in feces of bighorns as indicators of food habits. Journal of Wildlife Management 37, 363–366.
Plant fragmentation in feces of bighorns as indicators of food habits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tuft, K. D., Crowther, M. S., and McArthur, C. (2011). Multiple scales of diet selection by brush-tailed rock-wallabies (Petrogale penicillata). Australian Mammalogy 33, 169–180.
Multiple scales of diet selection by brush-tailed rock-wallabies (Petrogale penicillata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |