Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Prediction and evaluation of enteric methane emissions from lactating dairy cows using different levels of covariate information

B. Santiago-Juarez A B C , L. E. Moraes B , J. A. D. R. N. Appuhamy B , W. F. Pellikaan A , D. P. Casper D , J. Tricarico E and E. Kebreab B F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

B Department of Animal Science, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

C Department of Agriculture and Agrofood, University of Toulouse – École d’Ingénieurs de Purpan, 31076, France.

D Department of Dairy Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.

E Innovation Center for US Dairy, Rosemont, IL 60018, USA.

F Corresponding author. Email: ekebreab@ucdavis.edu

Animal Production Science 56(3) 557-564 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15496
Submitted: 28 August 2015  Accepted: 28 October 2015   Published: 9 February 2016

Abstract

The dairy sector contributes to global warming through enteric methane (CH4) emissions. Methane is also a loss of energy to the ruminant. Several studies have developed CH4 prediction models to assess mitigation strategies to reduce emissions. However, the majority of these models have low predictive ability or require numerous inputs that are often not readily available in commercial dairy operations. In this context, the objective of the present paper was to develop CH4 prediction models by using varying levels of information available at the farm level. The seven complexity levels used the following information: (1) dietary nutrient composition, (2) milk yield and composition, (3) Levels 1 and 2, (4) Level 3 plus dry matter intake (DMI), (5) Level 4 plus bodyweight, (6) Level 2 plus DMI, and (7) DMI only. Models were fitted to 489 individual enteric-CH4 measurements from 30 indirect calorimetry studies and evaluated with an independent database comprising 215 treatment means from 62 studies collected from the literature. Within each complexity level, all possible mixed-effect models were fitted and those with the lowest values of Akaike or Bayesian information criteria were selected using lme4 package in R. Models were evaluated using mean square prediction error (MSPE) based statistic, root MSPE (RMSPE) to observation standard deviation ratio, concordance correlation coefficient and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency methods. All fitted models performed well with an acceptable error estimates (RMSPE as a percentage of observed mean (RMSPE%) = 16–24%), with more than two-thirds of total error originating from random bias. Overall, models with DMI were more accurate (RMSPE% = 16–20%) than those without (RMSPE% = 20–24%). Although the best prediction model (RMSPE% = 16%) was developed using Level 5 information, a model using Level 2 information is recommended for on-farm methane estimates if DMI is not measured. The proposed models offer easy and practical tools to dairy producers for predicting CH4 emissions and evaluating CH4 mitigation strategies.

Additional keywords: commercial dairy, greenhouse gas emissions, model evaluation.


References

Bannink A, van Schijndel MW, Dijkstra J (2011) A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch National Inventory report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 603–618.
A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch National Inventory report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach.CrossRef |

Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) ‘lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4.R package version 1.1-7.’ Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 [Verified 28 June 2015]

Bauman DE, Griinari JM (2003) Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 23, 203–227.
Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFSjurc%3D&md5=792a8585a67f925eb4d70bbad2c07274CAS | 12626693PubMed |

Bibby J, Toutenburg H (1977) ‘Prediction and improved estimation in linear models.’ (John Wiley and Sons: London)

Broucek J (2014) Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: a review. Journal of Environmental Protection 5, 1482–1493.
Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: a review.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhvVGltb8%3D&md5=7e2ea0b7cf8d68fab292181c1268f2beCAS |

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 33, 261–304.
Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection.CrossRef |

Chilliard Y, Martin C, Rouel J, Doreau M (2009) Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed three forms of linseed, and their relationship with methane output. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5199–5211.
Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed three forms of linseed, and their relationship with methane output.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtF2qtrfE&md5=4c39339505cd7313684aa8ddd323acd9CAS | 19762838PubMed |

Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odondo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3456–3466.
Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntlCksLY%3D&md5=566e93a0ba92e8c0af29a08f3fa90fecCAS | 17582129PubMed |

Ellis JL, Bannink A, France J, Kebreab E, Dijkstra J (2010) Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models. Global Change Biology 16, 3246–3256.
Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models.CrossRef |

Eugène M, Masse D, Chiquette J, Benchaar C (2008) Meta-analysis on the effects of lipid supplementation on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 88, 331–334.
Meta-analysis on the effects of lipid supplementation on methane production in lactating dairy cows.CrossRef |

FAO (2010) ‘Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome)

Flatt WP, Warner RG, Loosli JK (1958) Influence of purified materials on the development of the ruminant stomach. Journal of Dairy Science 41, 1593–1600.
Influence of purified materials on the development of the ruminant stomach.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaG1MXhvVahtw%3D%3D&md5=5774ca5039d397c6f6adf4eaaa33d5a4CAS |

Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) ‘Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome)

Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 308–320.
Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production?CrossRef |

Holter JB, Young AJ (1992) Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2165–2175.
Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2Fhslantg%3D%3D&md5=701a4926f9bd9c8ad7b7a73771bcb54fCAS | 1401368PubMed |

IPCC (2006) ‘IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.’ (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan)

Kebreab E, Clarke K, Wagner-Riddle C, France J (2006) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86, 135–158.
Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: a review.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht1aktb7E&md5=b7e3ec0debb3f39b1eb0e94f281a9734CAS |

Kebreab E, Johnson KA, Archibeque SL, Pape D, Wirth T (2008) Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from US cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2738–2748.
Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from US cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ams7jF&md5=7e15893db9765c0247760930429ae768CAS | 18539822PubMed |

Kristensen T, Mogensen L, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2011) Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livestock Science 140, 136–148.
Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach.CrossRef |

Lashof A, Ahuja DR (1990) Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344, 529–531.
Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXitl2rs78%3D&md5=754bd7cc49eb9819f5fbb4b9041275edCAS |

Lin LIK (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268.
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKrtg%3D%3D&md5=6100493ec2dcf9a849539a4ef221b80fCAS |

Moate PJ, Williams SRO, Grainger C, Hannah MC, Ponnampalam EN, Eckard RJ (2011) Influence of cold-pressed canola, brewers grains and hominy meal as dietary supplements suitable for reducing enteric methane emissions from lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 254–264.
Influence of cold-pressed canola, brewers grains and hominy meal as dietary supplements suitable for reducing enteric methane emissions from lactating dairy cows.CrossRef |

Moe PW, Tyrrell HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.
Methane production in dairy cows.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXlt1Og&md5=0841dc684fe0c582ecc9d37de8a32a18CAS |

Moe PW, Flatt WP, Tyrrell HF (1972) Net energy value of feeds for lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 945–958.

Moraes LE, Strathe AB, Fadel JG, Casper DP, Kebreab E (2014) Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle. Global Change Biology 20, 2140–2148.
Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle.CrossRef | 24259373PubMed |

Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50, 885–900.
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.CrossRef |

NRC (2001) ‘Nutrient Requirements of dairy cattle.’ 7th edn. (National Research Council, National Academy Press: Washington, DC)

Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models.CrossRef |

van Lingen HJ, Crompton LA, Hendriks WH, Reynolds CK, Dijkstra J (2014) Meta-analysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7115–7132.
Meta-analysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslyrurrJ&md5=905b27f29059d356862c205e2e96793bCAS | 25218750PubMed |

Vernon RG, Denis RGP, Sorensen A (2001) Signals of adiposity. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 21, 197–214.
Signals of adiposity.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhsFWgu70%3D&md5=d30dcecc390aa282c6b55e89a7ab3381CAS | 11872318PubMed |

Wilkerson VA, Casper DP, Mertens DR (1995) The prediction of methane production of Holstein cows by several equations. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 2402–2414.
The prediction of methane production of Holstein cows by several equations.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhtFOrtA%3D%3D&md5=7b9cdf71b76a519b1bb77222c7f9a563CAS | 8747332PubMed |

Wilkerson VA, Mertens DR, Casper DP (1997) Prediction of excretion of manure and nitrogen by Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 3193–3204.
Prediction of excretion of manure and nitrogen by Holstein dairy cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXht1ynug%3D%3D&md5=8690eda8c9739869f2e7639cb12fb70dCAS | 9436099PubMed |

Yan T, Mayne CS, Porter MG (2006) Effects of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets. International Congress Series 1293, 123–126.
Effects of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhs1amsbk%3D&md5=d778f25ca2a25d4d7045613d7e28e88eCAS |



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (2)