Fodder quality and intake by dairy cows. 1. Preference for oaten haysR. A. Dynes A , D. B. Purser B C E and S. K. Baker B D
A AgResearch Limited, Lincoln Research Centre, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
B HAEN Pty Ltd, PO 524 Northam, WA 6401, Australia.
C Gilmac (Mackie Hay), 3 Ord Street, West Perth, WA 6005, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15718
Submitted: 11 October 2015 Accepted: 9 April 2016 Published online: 17 June 2016
This work was undertaken to determine whether measurement of preference 30 min after alternative hays are offered to lactating dairy cows adequately predicts preference over a 3-day period and to determine the influence of the concentrations of water-soluble carbon (WSC) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) of hays on preference. Eleven test hays were chosen to provide an NDF concentration of between 45% and 60% and a WSC concentration of between 10% and 30%. The test hays were each offered to lactating dairy cows as an alternative choice, with two control hays with NDF concentrations of 49% and 54%. A replicated Latin-square design was used to determine the preference of cows for the test hays, using three cows for each test hay versus control-hay comparison. Preference measured 30 min after hays were offered to cows was highly correlated with measures of preference made after 24 h and again for the same measures on the third day of the hays being offered. However, preference measures with the two different control hays were not well related, thus indicating that preference values are control-hay specific. Total hay intake was unchanged with the low-NDF control hay but declined with increasing NDF concentration of the test hays with the higher-NDF control hay. WSC did not influence preference at any one level of NDF of the test hays when the control hay had a low NDF concentration, but there was a small rise in preference at each NDF level when the control hay had a higher NDF concentration. This may have been a result of a contribution of WSC to digestibility as much as to taste response. With the low-NDF control hay, drivers of preference were the NDF concentration and the digestibility of the hay, but with the higher-NDF control hay, the drivers were the NDF concentration and fibre characteristics (shear and potential fibre digestibility). Calculation of the NDF concentration of the total hay consumed, test plus control hays, suggested that a change in drivers of selection is likely at the point where the NDF concentration of the test hay equals that of the control hay. Unless models identifying selection drivers handle non-linear data, misleading results may be obtained.
Additional keywords: animal nutrition, dairy cows, feeding behaviour.
ReferencesAllen MS (1997) Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1447–1462.
| Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXks1Ogs7g%3D&md5=5f39f1c67bfa4f8ee2a542b38cdbadaeCAS | 9241607PubMed |
Armentano L, Pereira M (1997) Measuring the effectiveness of fiber by animal response trials. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1416–1425.
| Measuring the effectiveness of fiber by animal response trials.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXks1Ogs70%3D&md5=aa32bb2e4d66fc09eea13cd642cdca22CAS | 9241604PubMed |
Atwood BS, Provenza FD, Weidmeier RD, Banner RE (2001) Changes in preferences of gestating heifers fed untreated or ammoniated straw in different flavors. Journal of Animal Science 79, 3027–3033.
Baker SK, Klein L, Minson DJ, Purser DB (1992) Voluntary intake and the energy required to shear or comminute dry, mature subterranean clovers. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 17, 74
Cannas A, Van Soest PJ, Pell AN (2003) Use of animal and dietary information to predict rumen turnover. Animal Feed Science and Technology 106, 95–117.
| Use of animal and dietary information to predict rumen turnover.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtlSmtrY%3D&md5=7999f6e01d1b8758265f4e6aad6e334bCAS |
Chiy PC, Phillips CJC (1999) The intake of sweet, salty and bitter concentrates by dairy cows. Animal Science: an International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Research 68, 731–740.
Forbes MJ (2007) A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort. Nutrition Research Reviews 20, 132–146.
| A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort.CrossRef |
Forbes MJ (2010) Palatability: principles, methodology and practice for farm animals. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 5, No. 052
| Palatability: principles, methodology and practice for farm animals.CrossRef |
Francis SA, Chapman DF, Doyle PT, Leury J (2006) Dietary preferences of cows offered choices between white clover and ‘high sugar’ and ‘typical’ perennial ryegrass cultivars. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1579–1587.
| Dietary preferences of cows offered choices between white clover and ‘high sugar’ and ‘typical’ perennial ryegrass cultivars.CrossRef |
Hall MB (2003) Challenges with nonfiber carbohydrate methods. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3226–3232.
Horadagoda A, Fulkerson WJ, Nandra KS, Barchia IM (2009) Grazing preferences by dairy cows for 14 forage species. Animal Production Science 49, 586–594.
| Grazing preferences by dairy cows for 14 forage species.CrossRef |
Klein L, Baker SK (1993) Composition of the fractions of dry, mature subterranean clover digested in vivo and in vitro. In ‘Proceedings of the XVII international grassland congress’. (Eds MJ Baker, JR Crush, LR Humphreys) pp. 593–595. (New Zealand Grasslands Association, Tropical Grasslands Society of Australia, New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Australian Society of Animal Production and New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science Publishers: Palmerston North, New Zealand)
Mertens DR (1994) Regulation of forage intake. In ‘National conference on forage quality, evaluation and utilization, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1994’. (Eds GC Fahey, M Collins, DR Mertens, LE Moser) pp. 450–493. (American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America Publishers: Madison, WI)
Mertens DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463–1481.
| Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXks1Ogs7k%3D&md5=e65a722816d44bd9b5eb388fd133adfdCAS | 9241608PubMed |
Nombekela SW, Murphy MR, Gonyou HW, Marden JI (1994) Dietary preferences in early lactation cows as affected by primary tastes and some common feed flavors. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2393–2399.
| Dietary preferences in early lactation cows as affected by primary tastes and some common feed flavors.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FltFyqsg%3D%3D&md5=cca203ee5b44574c73026ef32387336eCAS | 7962861PubMed |
Pain S, Revell D (2009) ‘Fodder quality specifications. Identifying predictors of preference between hays.’ RIRDC publication no. 09/011. RIRDC Project No. UA-64A. (RIRDC: Canberra)
Provenza FD (1996) Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2010–2020.
Purser DB (1980) Nutritional value of mediterranean pastures. In ‘Grazing animals’. (Ed FWH Morley) pp. 159–180. (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam)
Reynoso-Campos O, Fox DG, Blake RW, Barry MC, Tedeschi LO, Nicholson CF, Kaiser HM, Oltenacu PA (2004) Predicting nutritional requirements and lactation performance of dual-purpose cows using a continuous model. Agricultural Systems 80, 67–83.
Sadler R Purser DB Baker SK 2016
Smit HJ, Tamminga S, Elgersma A (2006) Dairy cattle grazing preference among six cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Agronomy Journal 98, 1213–1220.
| Dairy cattle grazing preference among six cultivars of perennial ryegrass.CrossRef |
Thonney ML, Hogue DE (2013) Fermentable fiber for diet formulation. In ‘Proceedings 2013 Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, 75th meeting’, East Syracuse, NY. pp. 174–189. (Department of Animal Science Cornell University: Ithaca, NY)
Ulyatt MJ (1973) The feeding value of herbage. In ‘Chemistry and biochemistry of herbage’. (Eds GW Bailey, RW Bailey) pp. 131–178. (Academic Press: London)
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=5ac74045d70ec4fdb1b477d24fb39c1dCAS | 1660498PubMed |
Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA (2006) Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2618–2633.
| Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsVOltLo%3D&md5=0c581ad84a8fd60e36cacfa60902453bCAS | 16772582PubMed |
Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Ametaj BN, Steingass H, Drochner W (2010) A model to optimise the requirements of lactating dairy cows for physically effective neutral detergent fibre. Archives of Animal Nutrition 64, 265–278.
| A model to optimise the requirements of lactating dairy cows for physically effective neutral detergent fibre.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXotlyhsLo%3D&md5=7113d7fa3bd8a23209705838bebcf490CAS | 20722298PubMed |
Zebeli Q, Aschenbach JR, Tefal M, Boguhn J, Ametaj BN, Drochner W (2012) Invited review: role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1041–1056.
| Invited review: role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtFWmsrs%3D&md5=1811cf1afc398f8d10ef4f442d46ddf0CAS | 22365188PubMed |