Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Revised greenhouse-gas emissions from Australian dairy farms following application of updated methodology

K. M. Christie A D , R. P. Rawnsley A , C. Phelps B and R. J. Eckard C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Burnie, Tas. 7320, Australia.

B Dairy Australia, Level 5 IBM Tower, Southbank, Vic. 3006, Australia.

C Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Karen.Christie@utas.edu.au

Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16286
Submitted: 4 May 2016  Accepted: 26 September 2016   Published online: 16 November 2016

Abstract

Every year since 1990, the Australian Federal Government has estimated national greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions to meet Australia’s reporting commitments under the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGGI) methodology used to estimate Australia’s GHG emissions has altered over time, as new research data have been used to improve the inventory emission factors and algorithms, with the latest change occurring in 2015 for the 2013 reporting year. As measuring the GHG emissions on farm is expensive and time-consuming, the dairy industry is reliant on estimating emissions using tools such as the Australian Dairy Carbon Calculator (ADCC). The present study compared the emission profiles of 41 Australian dairy farms with ADCC using the old (pre-2015) and new (post-2015) NGGI methodologies to examine the impact of the changes on the emission intensity across a range of dairy-farm systems. The estimated mean (±s.d.) GHG emission intensity increased by 3.0%, to 1.07 (±0.02) kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per kilogram of fat-and-protein-corrected milk (kg CO2e/kg FPCM). When comparing the emission intensity between the old and new NGGI methodologies at a regional level, the change in emission intensity varied between a 4.6% decrease and 10.4% increase, depending on the region. When comparing the source of emissions between old and new NGGI methodologies across the whole dataset, methane emissions from enteric fermentation and waste management both increased, while nitrous oxide emissions from waste management and nitrogen fertiliser management, CO2 emissions from energy consumption and pre-farm gate (supplementary feed and fertilisers) emissions all declined. Enteric methane remains a high source of emissions and so will remain a focus for mitigation research. However, these changes to the NGGI methodology have highlighted a new ‘hotspot’ in methane from manure management. Researchers and farm managers will have greater need to identify and implement practices on-farm to reduce methane losses to the environment.

Additional keywords: carbon dioxide, ADCC, methane, nitrous oxide.


References

Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy H, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science 56, 169–180.
A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xis1amu70%3D&md5=d1eb2b764dd6396af5b37141ae7a2b3dCAS |

Christie KM, Gourley CJP, Rawnsley RP, Eckard RJ, Awty IM (2012) Whole-farm systems analysis of Australian dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Production Science 52, 998–1011.
Whole-farm systems analysis of Australian dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions.CrossRef |

Dairy Australia (2012) Dairying for tomorrow: survey of natural resource management on dairy farms report. Dairy Australia, Melbourne.

Dairy Australia (2015) Australian Dairy Industry Sustainability Framework progress report – December 2015. Dairy Australia, Melbourne. Available at http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/~/media/Documents/Industry%20overview/Sustainability/2015%20-%20Australian%20Dairy%20Industry%20-%20Sustainability%20Framework%20-%20Progress%20Report%202015.pdf [Verified 29 June 2016]

Dairy Australia (2016) ‘Dairy farm facts.’ (Dairy Australia: Melbourne). Available at http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/Markets-and-statistics/Farm-facts.aspx [Verified 28 June 2016]

Department of the Environment (DoE) (2015a) Australia’s emissions projections 2014–15. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/f4bdfc0e-9a05-4c0b-bb04-e628ba4b12fd/files/australias-emissions-projections-2014-15.pdf [Verified 29 June 2016)

Department of the Environment (DoE) (2015b) ‘National inventory report 2013. Vol. 1. The Australian Government submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Australian national greenhouse accounts.’ (Department of the Environment: Canberra) Available at https://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-measurement [Verified 25 November 2015]

FAO (2011) ‘World livestock 2011. Livestock in food security.’ (FAO: Rome)

Gerber P, Steinheld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijsktra J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) ‘Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment and mitigation opportunities.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)

Gourley CJP, Dougherty WJ, Weaver D, Aarons SR, Awty I, Gibson D, Hannah M, Smith A, Peverill K (2012) Farm-scale nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur balances and use efficiencies on Australian dairy farms. Animal Production Science 52, 929–944.
Farm-scale nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur balances and use efficiencies on Australian dairy farms.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xht1GrsL7O&md5=f530dd6a35ddccaccac8019e84e6f2b4CAS |

Heard J, Wales B (2009) ‘Pasture consumption and feed conversion efficiency calculator instruction manual.’ (Department of Primary Industries: Melbourne) Available at http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/dairy/pastures-management/calculator [Verified 2 February 2012]

IBM Corp. (2013) ‘IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0.’ (IMB Corporation: Armonk, NY)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) ‘Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.’ Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. (Eds HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) ‘Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.’ (Eds TF Stocker, D Qin, G-K Plattner, M Tignor, SK Allen, J Boschung, A Nauels, Y Xia, V Bex, PM Midgley) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

International Dairy Federation (IDF) (2006) ‘Comprehensive review of scientific literature pertaining to nitrogen protein conversion factors.’ (International Diary Federation: Brussels)

Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268.
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKrtg%3D%3D&md5=6100493ec2dcf9a849539a4ef221b80fCAS |

Lin LI (2000) A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56, 324–325.

McBride GB (2005) A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. NIWA client report: HAM2005-062. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Reyenga P, Birchall S, Christie K, Eckard R, Moate P, Rawnsley R, Staunton K (2015) Review of the methods and data used to estimate dairy cattle emissions in the national inventory – report to the Department of the Environment. Department of the Environment, Canberra.



Export Citation

View Altmetrics