Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Methane emissions from Nellore bulls on pasture fed two levels of starch-based supplement with or without a source of oil

A. Jose Neto A C , J. D. Messana A , L. G. Rossi A , I. P. C. Carvalho A and T. T. Berchielli A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Zootecnia da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.

B Membro INCT/CA – UNESP – Departamento de Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.

C Corresponding author. Email: antoniojoseneto@yahoo.com.br

Animal Production Science 59(4) 654-663 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16095
Submitted: 14 February 2016  Accepted: 11 February 2018   Published: 4 June 2018

Abstract

Methane emissions (CH4) from enteric fermentation represent an energy loss to the animal ranging from 2% to 12% of gross energy (GE) intake; therefore, the challenge is to develop diets and handling strategies to mitigate CH4 emissions. This study tested the hypothesis that fat supplementation as a source of energy could reduce CH4 emissions without decrease animal production, independently of the starch level utilised. Thus, the goal of this study was to assess the combined effects of high- or low-starch supplements with or without a source of oil (soybean grain) on intake, digestibility, performance, and CH4 emissions of finishing Nellore bulls [n = 44; initial bodyweight (BW) = 414 ± 12 kg; age of 20 months] grazing on Brachiaria brizantha cv. Xaraés during the dry season. No interactions between starch level and oil source (soybean grain) supplementation with respect to intake of dry matter (DM), forage DM, supplement DM, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), ether extract (EE), or GE were found. However, there was an effect of starch and oil source on intake of EE. There were no interactions between starch level and oil source supplementation with respect to digestibility of DM, OM, NDF, CP, EE, or digestibility energy. Irrespective of the starch level utilised, the addition of soybean grain (oil source) decreased the digestibility of NDF and increased the digestibility of EE. In relation to animal performance, there were no interactions between starch level and oil regarding initial BW, final BW, average daily gain (ADG), gain efficiency, hot carcass weight, dressing, carcass gain, fat depth, or longissimus muscle area. However, the addition of soybean grain (oil source) increased the fat depth independently of the starch level used. There was no interaction between starch-based supplementation level and oil source on CH4 emissions when expressed in g/day, g/kg DM intake, g/kg OM intake, g/kg NDF intake, % of GE intake, g/g EE intake, g/kg ADG, or g/kg of carcass gain. Therefore, the addition of soybean grain (oil source) in supplements, independent of starch level used, was associated with reduced CH4 emissions expressed in g/day. Additionally, soybean grain (oil source) decreased enteric CH4 emissions relative to GE and EE intake and ADG for animals fed high- or low-starch supplements. Soybean grain supplementation is effective at reducing enteric CH4 emissions from Nellore bulls grazing on tropical pasture.

Additional keywords: concentrates, forage, greenhouse gases, ruminant.


References

AFRC (1993) ‘Energy and protein requirements of ruminants.’ Agricultural and Food Research Council. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Anderson SJ, Merrill JK, McDonnell ML, Klopfenstein TJ (1988) Digestibility and utilization of mechanically processed soybean hulls by lambs and steers. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2965–2976.
Digestibility and utilization of mechanically processed soybean hulls by lambs and steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

AOAC (1995) Official method No. 934.01, 942.05, 920.85. In ‘Official method of analysis’. 15th edn. (Ed. K Helrich) pp. 191–201. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.: Arlington, VA)

Bannink A, France J, Lopez S, Gerrits WJJ, Kebreab E, Tamminga S, Dijkstra J (2008) Modeling the implications of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall. Animal Feed Science and Technology 143, 3–26.
Modeling the implications of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barthram GT (1985) Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. In ‘The Hill Farming Research Organization biennial report 1984/1985’. pp. 29–30. (Hill Farming Research Organization: Midlothian, Penicuik, UK)

Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA (2008) Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.
Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benchaar C, Pomar C, Chiquette J (2001) Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modeling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 563–574.
Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modeling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brokaw L, Hess BW, Rule DC (2001) Supplemental soybean oil or corn for beef heifers grazing summer pasture: effects on forage intake, ruminal fermentation, and site and extent of digestion. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2704–2712.
Supplemental soybean oil or corn for beef heifers grazing summer pasture: effects on forage intake, ruminal fermentation, and site and extent of digestion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bruinenberg MH, Van Der Honing Y, Agnew RE, Yan T, Van Vuuren AM, Valk H (2002) Energy metabolism of dairy cows fed on grass. Livestock Production Science 75, 117–128.
Energy metabolism of dairy cows fed on grass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caton JS, Dhuyvetter DV (1997) Influence of energy supplementation on grazing ruminants: requirements and responses. Journal of Animal Science 75, 533–542.
Influence of energy supplementation on grazing ruminants: requirements and responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Czerkawski JW, Clapperton JL (1984) Fats as energy-yielding compounds in the ruminant diet. In ‘Fats in animal nutrition’. (Ed. J Wiseman) pp. 249–263. (Butterworths: Boston, MA)

Czerkawski JW, Blaxter KL, Wainman FW (1966) The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane production. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 349–362.
The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DeRamus HA, Clement TC, Giampola DD, Dickison PC (2003) Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 269–277.
Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Desbois AP, Smith VJ (2010) Antibacterial free fatty acids: activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85, 1629–1642.
Antibacterial free fatty acids: activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drouillard JS (2012) Utilization of crude glycerin in beef cattle. In ‘Biofuel co-products as livestock feed’. (Ed. HPS Makkar) pp. 155–161. (FAO: Rome, Italy) Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3009e/i3009e.pdf [Verified 22 May 2018]

Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Report of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e.pdf [Verified 10 June 2015]

Food and Agriculture Organization (2009) The State of Food and Agriculture. Livestock in the balance. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf [Verified 24 May 2015]

Garcés-Yépez P, Kunkle WE, Bates DB, Moore JE, Thatcher WW, Sollenberger LE (1997) Effects of supplemental energy source and amount on forage intake and performance by steers and intake and diet digestibility by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1918–1925.
Effects of supplemental energy source and amount on forage intake and performance by steers and intake and diet digestibility by sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grainger C, Williams R, Clarke T, Wright ADG, Eckard RJ (2010) Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes long-term reduction of methane emissions from lactating dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2612–2619.
Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes long-term reduction of methane emissions from lactating dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greiner SP, Rouse GH, Wilson DE, Cundiff LV, Wheeler TL (2003) Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live measurements. Journal of Animal Science 81, 466–473.
Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grigsby KN, Kerley MS, Paterson JA, Weigel JC (1992) Site and extent of nutrient digestion by steers fed a low-quality bromegrass hay diet with incremental levels of soybean hull substitution. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1941–1949.
Site and extent of nutrient digestion by steers fed a low-quality bromegrass hay diet with incremental levels of soybean hull substitution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall KL, Goetsch AL, Landis KM, Forster LA, Brake AC (1990) Effects of a fat and ground maize supplement on feed intake and digestion by cattle consuming bermudagrass hay (Cynodon dactylon). Animal Feed Science and Technology 30, 275–288.
Effects of a fat and ground maize supplement on feed intake and digestion by cattle consuming bermudagrass hay (Cynodon dactylon).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harfoot CG, Hazlewood GP (1997) Lipid metabolism in the rumen. In ‘The rumen microbial ecosystem’. pp. 382–426. (Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Hegarty RS (1999) Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Crop and Pasture Science 50, 1321–1328.
Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heird CE, Goetsch AL, Brown AH, Lewis PK, Johnson ZB (1994) Different supplements for steers consuming low-quality forage. The Professional Animal Scientist 10, 112–117.
Different supplements for steers consuming low-quality forage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hess BW, Moss GE, Rule DC (2008) A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86, E188–E204.
A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM (2013) Special Topics – Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5045–5069.
Special Topics – Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huntington GB, Harmon DL, Richards CJ (2006) Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, E14–E24.
Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Iraira SP, Ruíz de la Torre JL, Rodríguez-Prado M, Calsamiglia S, Manteca X, Ferret A (2013) Feed intake, ruminal fermentation, and animal behavior of beef heifers fed forage free diets containing nonforage fiber sources. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3827–3835.
Feed intake, ruminal fermentation, and animal behavior of beef heifers fed forage free diets containing nonforage fiber sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jenkins TC (1993) Lipid metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 3851–3863.
Lipid metabolism in the rumen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jenkins TC, Wallace RJ, Moate PJ, Mosley EE (2008) Board-invited review: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. Journal of Animal Science 86, 397–412.
Board-invited review: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson AD (1978) Sample preparation and chemical analysis of vegetation. In ‘Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production’. (Ed. LT Mannetje) pp. 96–102. (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Aberystwyth)

Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
Methane emissions from cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environmental Science & Technology 28, 359–362.
Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jose Neto (2016) Energy sources in the supplementation of beef cattle grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Xaraés. Jaboticabal, 2016, 168 p. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, 2016. Available at https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/136386/joseneto_a_dr_jabo_int.pdf?isAllowed=n&sequence=4 [Verified 5 January 2018]

Jose Neto A, Messana JD, Ribeiro AF, Vito ES, Rossi LG, Berchielli TT (2015) Effect of starch-based supplementation level combined with oil on intake, performance, and methane emissions of growing Nellore bulls on pasture. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2275–2284.
Effect of starch-based supplementation level combined with oil on intake, performance, and methane emissions of growing Nellore bulls on pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kunkle WE, Johns JT, Poore MH, Herd DB (2000) Designing supplementation programs for beef cattle fed forage based diets. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1–11.
Designing supplementation programs for beef cattle fed forage based diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee HJ, Lee SC, Kim JD, Oh YG, Kim BK, Kim CW, Kim KJ (2003) Methane production potential of feed ingredients as measured by in vitro gas test. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 16, 1143–1150.
Methane production potential of feed ingredients as measured by in vitro gas test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lennarz WJ (1966) Lipid metabolism in the bacteria. Advances in Lipid Research 4, 175–225.
Lipid metabolism in the bacteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: From microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351–365.
Methane mitigation in ruminants: From microbe to the farm scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mc Geough EJ, Kiely PO, Hart KJ, Moloney AP, Boland TM, Kenny DA (2010) Methane emissions, feed intake, performance, digestibility, and rumen fermentation of finishing beef cattle offered whole-crop wheat silages differing in grain content. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2703–2716.
Methane emissions, feed intake, performance, digestibility, and rumen fermentation of finishing beef cattle offered whole-crop wheat silages differing in grain content.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates T, Colombatto D (2004) Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3346–3356.
Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mertens DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463–1481.
Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moe PW, Tyrrell HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.
Methane production in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monteny JG, Bannink A, Chadwick D (2006) Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 163–170.
Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nagaraja TG, Newbold CJ, Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1997) Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. In ‘The rumen microbial ecosystem’. (Eds PN Hobson, CS Stewart) pp. 523–632. (Blackie Academic & Professional Inc.: London)

Nakamura T, Owen FG (1989) High amounts of soy hulls for pelleted concentrate diets. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 988–994.
High amounts of soy hulls for pelleted concentrate diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nkrumah JD, Okine EK, Mathison GW, Schmid K, Li C, Basarab JA, Price MA, Wang Z, Moore SS (2006) Relationships of feedlot efficiency, performance, and feeding behaviour with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 145–153.
Relationships of feedlot efficiency, performance, and feeding behaviour with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NRC (2000) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th rev. edn. (National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC)

Olson KC, Cochran RC, Jones TJ, Vanzant ES, Titgemeyer EC, Johnson DE (1999) Effects of ruminal administration of supplemental degradable intake protein and starch on utilization of low-quality warm season grass hay by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1016–1025.
Effects of ruminal administration of supplemental degradable intake protein and starch on utilization of low-quality warm season grass hay by beef steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Orr AI, Henley JC, Rude BJ (2008) The substitution of corn with soybean hulls and subsequent impact on digestibility of a forage-based diet offered to beef cattle. The Professional Animal Scientist 24, 566–571.
The substitution of corn with soybean hulls and subsequent impact on digestibility of a forage-based diet offered to beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Palmquist DL (1984) Use of fat in diets for lactating dairy cows. In ‘Fats in animal nutrition’. (Ed. J Weisman) pp. 357–381. (Butterworths: London, UK)

Palmquist DL (1988) The feeding value of fats. In ‘Feed science’. (Ed. ER Orskov) pp. 293–311. (Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Palmquist DL (1994) The role of dietary fats in efficiency of ruminants. The Journal of Nutrition 124, 1377–1382.

Parsons GL, Shelor MK, Drouillard JS (2009) Performance and carcass traits of finishing heifers fed crude glycerin. Journal of Animal Science 87, 653–657.
Performance and carcass traits of finishing heifers fed crude glycerin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patil AR, Goetsch AL, Lewis PK, Heird CE (1993) Effects of supplementing growing steers with high levels of partially hydrogenated tallow on feed intake, digestibility, live weight gain, and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2284–2292.
Effects of supplementing growing steers with high levels of partially hydrogenated tallow on feed intake, digestibility, live weight gain, and carcass characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Popova M, Morgavi DP, Martin C (2013) Methanogens and methanogenesis in the rumens and ceca of lambs fed two different high-grain-content diets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79, 1777–1786.
Methanogens and methanogenesis in the rumens and ceca of lambs fed two different high-grain-content diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saliba EOS, Gonçalves NC, Barbosa GSSC, Borges ALCC, Rodriguez NM, Moreira GR, Silva FA (2013) Evaluation of the infrared spectroscopy method for the quantification of nanolipe marker in feces of dairy cattle. In ‘Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition in sustainable animal production’. (Eds JW Oltjen, E Kebreab, H Lapierre) pp. 247–248. (Wageningen Academic Publisher: Wageningen, The Netherlands) 10.3920/978-90-8686-781-3_81

Santos SA, Filho SCV, Detmann E, Valadares RFD, Ruas JRM, Amaral PM (2011) Different forage sources for F1 Holstein×Gir dairy cows. Livestock Science 142, 48–58.
Different forage sources for F1 Holstein×Gir dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scholljegerdes EJ, Hess BW, Moss GE, Hixon DL, Rule DC (2004) Influence of supplemental cracked high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds on site and extent of digestion in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3577–3588.
Influence of supplemental cracked high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds on site and extent of digestion in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shain DH, Sindt MH, Grant RJ, Klopfenstein TJ, Stock RA (1993) Effect of a soybean hull:soy 1ecithin:soapstock mixture on ruminal digestion and performance of growing beef calves and lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71, 1266–1275.
Effect of a soybean hull:soy 1ecithin:soapstock mixture on ruminal digestion and performance of growing beef calves and lactating dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shibata M, Terada F (2010) Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2–10.
Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spörndly E (1991) Supplementation of dairy cows offered freshly cut herbage ad libitum with starchy concentrates based on barley or fibrous concentrates based on unmolasses sugar beet pulp and wheat bran. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 131–139.

Valadares Filho SC, Machado PAS, Chizzotti ML, Amaral HF, Magalhães CA, Rocha Jr VR, Capelle ER (2010) CQBAL 3.0. Brazilian tables of the chemical composition of feeds for ruminants. Available from URL: http://cqbal.agropecuaria.ws/webcqbal/en/index.php [Verified 10 October 2015]

Valente TNP, Detmann E, Queiroz AC, Valadares Filho SC, Gomes DI, Figueiras JF (2011) Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2565–2573.
Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valin H, Havlík P, Mosnier A, Herrero M, Schmid E, Obersteiner M (2013) Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? Environmental Research Letters 8, 035019
Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valk H, Poelhuis HWK, Elliot RJ, Schuller E (1990) Effect of fibrous and starchy carbohydrates in concentrates as supplements in a herbage-based diet for high yielding dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 475–486.

Van Kessel JAS, Russell JB (1996) The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 20, 205–210.
The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Nevel CJ (1991) Modification of rumen fermentation by the use of additives. In ‘Rumen microbial metabolism and ruminant digestion’. (Ed. JP Jouany) pp. 263–280. (Institut national de la recherche agronomique Inc.: Paris, France)

Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1981) Effect of methane inhibitors on the metabolism of rumen microbes in vitro. Archives of Animal Nutrition 31, 141–15l.

Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI (1988) Manipulation of rumen fermentation. In ‘The rumen microbial ecosystein’. (Ed. PN Hobson) pp. 387–443. (Elsevier Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY)

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lew BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Westberg HH, Johnson KA, Cossalman MW, Michael JJ (1998) A SF6 tracer technique: methane measurement from ruminants. In ‘USEPA – evaluating ruminant livestock efficiency projects and programs’. pp. 40. (Washington State University Inc.: Pullman, Washington, DC)

Williams YJ, Popovski S, Rea SM, Skillman LC, Toovey AF, Northwood KS, Wright ADG (2009) A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of Archaea populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 1860–1866.
A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of Archaea populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zeitz JO, Bucher S, Zhou X, Meile L, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR (2013) Inhibitory effects of saturated fatty acids on methane production by methanogenic Archaea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 22, 44–49.
Inhibitory effects of saturated fatty acids on methane production by methanogenic Archaea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zervas G, Fegeros K, Koytsotolis K, Goulas C, Mantzios A (1998) Soy hulls as a replacement for maize in lactating dairy ewe diets with or without dietary fat supplements. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76, 65–75.
Soy hulls as a replacement for maize in lactating dairy ewe diets with or without dietary fat supplements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |