Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Piggery pond sludge as a nitrogen source for crops 2. Assay of wet and stockpiled piggery pond sludge by successive cereal crops or direct measurement of soil available N

Y. Kliese A , W. M. Strong B , R. C. Dalal C D and N. W. Menzies A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Land and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Department of Plant Industries and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Ram.Dalal@nrm.qld.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(5) 517-526 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04230
Submitted: 5 October 2004  Accepted: 25 February 2005   Published: 31 May 2005

Abstract

The appropriate use of wastes is a significant issue for the pig industry due to increasing pressure from regulatory authorities to protect the environment from pollution. Nitrogen contained in piggery pond sludge (PPS) is a potential source of supplementary nutrient for crop production. Nitrogen contribution following the application of PPS to soil was obtained from 2 field experiments on the Darling Downs in southern Queensland on contrasting soil types, a cracking clay (Vertosol) and a hardsetting sandy loam (Sodosol), and related to potentially mineralisable N from laboratory incubations conducted under controlled conditions and NO3 accumulation in the field. Piggery pond sludge was applied as-collected (wet PPS) and following stockpiling to dry (stockpiled PPS). Soil NO3 levels increased with increased application rates of wet and stockpiled PPS. Supplementary N supply from PPS estimated by fertiliser equivalence was generally unsatisfactory due to poor precision with this method, and also due to a high level of NO3 in the clay soil before the first assay crop. Also low recoveries of N by subsequent sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) assay crops at the 2 sites due to low in-crop rainfall in 1999 resulted in low apparent N availability. Over all, 29% (range 12–47%) of total N from the wet PPS and 19% (range 0–50%) from the stockpiled PPS were estimated to be plant-available N during the assay period. The high concentration of NO3- for the wet PPS application on sandy soil after the first assay crop (1998 barley, Hordeum vulgare) suggests that leaching of NO3 could be of concern when high rates of wet PPS are applied before infrequent periods of high precipitation, due primarily to the mineral N contained in wet PPS. Low yields, grain protein concentrations, and crop N uptake of the sorghum crop following the barley crop grown on the clay soil demonstrated a low residual value of N applied in PPS.

NO3 in the sandy soil before sowing accounted for 79% of the variation in plant N uptake and was a better index than anaerobically mineralisable N (19% of variation explained). In clay soil, better prediction of crop N uptake was obtained when both anaerobically mineralisable N (39% of variation explained) and soil profile NO3 were used in combination (R2 = 0.49).

Additional keywords: nitrate N, anaerobic incubation, N uptake, grain yield, wheat, barley, sorghum.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Pig Research and Development Corporation for financial support, J. Standley, K. Spann, and J. Hagedorn for technical support, J. Cooper and S. Rowlings for field assistance, and K. Bell for statistical advice, and two anonymous referees for numerous suggestions to improve the presentation of the paper.


References


Best EK (1976) An automated method for determining nitrate nitrogen in soil extracts. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 33, 161–166. open url image1

Bremner JM (1965) Inorganic forms of nitrogen. ‘Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Agronomy 9’. (Ed. CA Black) pp. 1179–1237. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Bundy LG, Meisinger JJ (1994) Nitrogen availability indices. ‘Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties’. (Eds RW Weaver, S Angle, P Bottomley, D Bezdicek, S Smith, A Tabatabai, A Wollum) pp. 951–984. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Cameron KC, Rate AW, Carey PL, Smith NP (1995) Fate of nitrogen in pig effluent applied to a shallow stony pasture soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 533–542. open url image1

Cameron KC, Rate AW, Noonan MJ, Moore S, Smith NP, Kerr LE (1996) Lysimeter study of the fate of nutrients following subsurface injection and surface application of dairy pond sludge to pasture. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 58, 187–197.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Carey PL, Rate AW, Cameron KC (1997) Fate of nitrogen in pig slurry applied to a New Zealand pasture soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 941–959.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Castellanos JZ, Pratt PF (1981) Mineralization of manure nitrogen—correlation with laboratory indexes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45, 354–357. open url image1

Clewett, JF , Smith, PG , Partridge, IJ , George, DA ,  and  Peacock, A (1999). ‘Australian Rainman Version 3: An integrated software package of rainfall information for better management.’ (Q198071 Department of Primary Industries: Queensland)

Crooke WM, Simpson WE (1971) Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 9–10. open url image1

Dalal RC, Strong WM, Weston EJ, Cooper JE, Thomas GA (1997) Prediction of grain protein in wheat and barley in a subtropical environment from available water and nitrogen in Vertisols at sowing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 351–357.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fox RH, Piekielek WP (1984) Relationships among anaerobically mineralized nitrogen, chemical indexes, and nitrogen availability to corn. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 1087–1090. open url image1

Gardner WH (1986) Water retention: laboratory method. ‘Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy No. 9’. 2nd edn(Ed. A Klute) pp. 493–544. (American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 95–112. open url image1

Hong SD, Fox RH, Piekielek WP (1990) Field evaluation of several chemical indexes of soil nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil 123, 83–88. open url image1

Isbell, RF (1996). ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Keeney DR (1982) Nitrogen-availability indices. ‘Methods of Soil Analysis’. 2nd edn(Ed. AL Page) pp. 711–733. (American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Kliese YJ (2002) Nitrogen dynamics following the application of piggery pond sludge to cropping land in subtropical Australia. PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Kliese YJ, Dalal RC, Strong WM, Menzies NJ (2005) Piggery pond sludge as a nitrogen source to crops 1. Potential nitrogen mineralisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 245–255.
Crossref |
open url image1

Lawes Agricultural Trust (1996). ‘Genstat version 5, release 4.1.’ (ICAR: Rothamsted, UK)

McCracken DV, Corak SJ, Scott Smith M, Frye WW, Blevins RL (1989) Residual effects of nitrogen fertilization and winter cover cropping on nitrogen availability. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 1459–1464. open url image1

Motavalli PP, Kelling KA, Converse JC (1989) First-year nutrient availability from injected dairy manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 18, 180–185. open url image1

Ndayegamiye A, Cote D (1989) Effect of long-term pig slurry and solid cattle manure application on soil chemical and biological properties. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 69, 39–47. open url image1

Paul JW, Beauchamp EG (1995) Availability of manure slurry ammonium for corn using 15N-labelled (NH4)2SO4. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75, 35–42. open url image1

Phillips IR (2002) Nutrient leaching losses from undisturbed soil cores following application of piggery wastewater. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 515–532.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rees RM, Yan L, Ferguson M (1993b) The release and plant uptake of nitrogen from some plant and animal manures. Biology and Fertility of Soils 15, 285–293.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rees YJ, Pain BF, Phillips VR, Misselbrook TH (1993a) The influence of surface and sub-surface application methods for pig slurry on herbage yields and nitrogen recovery. Grass and Forage Science 48, 38–44. open url image1

Rochette P, Angers DA, Cote D (2000) Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following application of pig slurry for the 19th consecutive year: II. Nitrous oxide fluxes and mineral nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1396–1403. open url image1

Schoenau JJ, Dormer S, Grevers MCJ (1998) Swine manure as a nitrogen fertilizer for improving grain yield and protein concentration of spring wheat. ‘Proceedings of the Wheat Protein Symposium’. 9–10 March 1998, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada . (Ed.  DB Fowler , WE Geddes , AM Johnston , KR Preston , S Smith , A Tabatabai , A Wollum ) pp. 305–306. (Wheat Protein Production and Marketing: Saskatoon, Canada)


Shepherd MA (1993) Measurement of soil mineral nitrogen to predict the response of winter wheat to fertilizer nitrogen after applications of organic manures or after ploughed-out grass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 223–231. open url image1

Serna MD, Pomares F (1993) Evaluation of nitrogen availability in a soil treated with organic amendments. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 24, 1833–1844. open url image1

Steel, RGD ,  and  Torrie, JH (1980). ‘Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometric approach.’ 2nd edn . (McGraw-Hill: Toronto, Canada)

Tkachuk R (1969) Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for cereals and oilseed meals. Cereal Chemistry 46, 419–423. open url image1

USDA (1975). ‘Soil taxonomy.’ (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)

Westerman PW, King LD, Burns JC, Cummings GA, Overcash MR (1987) Swine manure and lagoon effluent applied to a temperate forage mixture: II. Rainfall runoff and soil chemical properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 16, 106–112. open url image1