Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The influence of water deficiency on the relationship between canola (Brassica napus L.), and two aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) and Brevicoryne brassicae (L.)

Chrystal King A , Helen Spafford Jacob A C and Françoise Berlandier B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Animal Biology (M085), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Western Australia Department of Agriculture, Locked Bag No. 4, Bentley DC, WA 6983, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: hsjacob@animals.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(4) 439-445 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05137
Submitted: 19 April 2005  Accepted: 18 December 2005   Published: 27 April 2006

Abstract

Commercially grown canola, Brassica napus, is negatively affected by both water deficiency and herbivory. A glasshouse experiment evaluated the relationship between water deficiency and herbivory of two aphid species, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) and Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), on canola. The effect of water deficiency on aphid performance was also evaluated. Brassica napus plants were provided with either continuous water (well-watered) or were watered only once per week (water-deficient). The plants were exposed to either B. brassicae, L. erysimi, or no aphids at all. Aphid population increase, plant growth, and water relations were measured after 3 weeks.

Water deficiency reduced plant growth and altered water relations in B. napus. Feeding by the aphid L. erysimi substantially reduced growth of both water-deficient and well-watered B. napus. However, herbivory by B. brassicae reduced plant growth only in conjunction with water limitation, demonstrating an interaction between limited water and insect infestation on the performance of B. napus. The aphid species and water deficiency treatments also differentially affected turgor potential, osmotic potential, leaf water potential, and leaf water content.

The two species of aphids responded differently to changes in their host plants. The average size and numbers of B. brassicae aphids were lower but the percentage of alates was higher on plants with limited water relative to those on well-watered plants. The average size and numbers of L. erysimi aphids were unaffected by water limitation and the percentage of alates produced was slightly reduced in the water-deficient plants.

Water limitation is likely to reduce the growth of plants, particularly when B. brassicae infests the crop. However, L. erysimi is probably the more serious pest of the two aphids in that it reduced plant growth regardless of watering regime and its development was unaffected by the status of the host plant.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Western Australia, School of Animal Biology, and Western Australia Department of Agriculture for contributing resources to conduct this study. Likewise we are grateful to G. Cass and G. Cawthray for technical assistance. We thank R. Creasy, D. Minkey, J. Plummer, P. Turner, and T. Worthington for helpful comments in improving the manuscript. We also thank A. Willis, O. Edwards, and an anonymous individual for their careful review of the manuscript.


References


Agrawal AA (2004) Plant defense and density dependence in the population growth of herbivores. American Naturalist 164, 113–120.
Crossref | PubMed |
[30 May 2003].

Hale MG , Orcutt DM (1987) ‘The physiology of plants under stress.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Harrewijn P (1978) The role of plant substance in polymorphism of the aphid, Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 24, 198–214. open url image1

Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001) The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta analysis. Ecology 82, 2045–2058. open url image1

Jones CG , Coleman JS (1991) Plant stress and insect herbivory: toward an integrated perspective. In ‘Response of plant to multiple stresses’. (Eds HA Mooney, WE Winner, EJ Pell) pp. 249–280. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Klingauf FA (1987) Host plant finding and acceptance. In ‘Aphids their biology, natural enemies and control’. Vol A. (Eds AK Minks, P Harrewijn) pp. 209–223. (Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam)

Louda SM, Collinge SK (1992) Plant resistance to insect herbivores: a field test of the environmental stress hypothesis. Ecology 73, 153–169. open url image1

Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 119–161.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mattson WJ, Haack RA (1987a) The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience 37, 110–118.
Crossref |
open url image1

Mattson WJ , Haack RA (1987 b) The role of drought in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects. In ‘Insect outbreaks’. (Eds P Barbosa, JC Schultz) pp. 365–407. (Academic Press: California)

Muller CB, Williams IS, Hardie J (2001) The role of nutrition, crowding and interspecific interactions in the development of winged aphids. Ecological Entomology 26, 330–340.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defence against herbivores. In ‘Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites’. (Eds GA Rosenthal, DH Janzen) pp. 3–54. (Academic Press: London)

Richards RA, Thurling N (1978) Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. I. Sensitivity at different stages of development. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 469–477.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sadras VO, Wilson LJ, Lally DA (1998) Water deficit enhanced cotton resistance to spider mite herbivory. Annals of Botany 81, 273–286.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148, 339–346. open url image1

Simpson GM (1981) ‘Water stress on plants.’ (Praeger Publishers: New York)

Thomas AT, Hodkinson ID (1991) Nitrogen, water stress and the feeding efficiency of lepidopteran herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 703–720. open url image1

Wearing CH (1972) Responses of Myzus persicae and Brevicoryne brassicae to leaf age and water stress in Brussels sprouts grown in pots. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 15, 61–80.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wearing CH, van Emden HF (1967) Studies on the relations of insect and host plant I. Effects of water stress in host plants on infestation by Aphis fabae Scop., Myzus periscae, (Sulz.) and Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). Nature 213, 1051–1052. open url image1

Wellings PW , Dixon AFG (1987) The role of weather and natural enemies in determining aphid outbreaks. In ‘Insect outbreaks’. (Eds P Barbosa, JC Schultz) pp. 313–346. (Academic Press: California)

White TCR (1974) A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to population of Selidosema suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Oecologia 16, 279–301.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

White TCR (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63, 90–105.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Willis AJ, Ash JE, Groves RH (1993) Combined effects of two arthropod herbivores and water stress on growth of Hypericum species. Oecologia 96, 517–525.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Willis AJ, Berentson PR, Ash JE (2003) Impacts of a weed biocontrol agent on recovery from water stress in a target and a non-target Hypericum species. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 320–333. open url image1

Zar JH (1984) ‘Biostatistical analysis.’ 2nd edn (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)