Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A farm-scale, bio-economic model for assessing investments in recycled water for irrigation

L. E. Brennan A D G , S. N. Lisson B D , P. L. Poulton C D , P. S. Carberry C D , K. L. Bristow E and S. Khan F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems/Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, Private Bag 54, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

C CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

D Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

E CSIRO Land and Water/CRC for Irrigation Futures, PMB, PO Aitkenvale, Qld 4814, Australia.

F CSIRO Land and Water/Charles Sturt University, PMB No. 3, Griffith, NSW 2680, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: lisa.brennan@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(11) 1035-1048 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06316
Submitted: 21 September 2007  Accepted: 21 July 2008   Published: 14 October 2008

Abstract

Demand for water in Australia is increasing along with growing pressure to maximise the efficiency of irrigation water use and seek additional and alternative irrigation supplies. The scarcity of water supplies coupled with the need for urban communities to dispose of large quantities of treated recycled water from sewage treatment plants has led to increasing interest from urban and rural communities in the reticulation of this water for irrigating adjacent crop-production areas. Proposals to use recycled water inevitably lead to a complex range of issues that need to be addressed, including:

  • costs and benefits of supplying an additional source of water to current or new cropping systems;

  • optimum irrigation design and management, particularly where there are multiple sources of irrigation water;

  • management of overflow from on-farm water storages; and

  • environmental implications with regard to salinity, runoff, drainage, nitrate leaching, and environmental flows.

Simulation models can capture many of the key factors and processes influencing irrigated crop production systems, and can play a useful role in exploring these issues. In this paper, we have described an approach that couples agricultural production system and economic models in a way that enables analysis of the likely benefits and risks of investing in recycled water, although the analysis is equally relevant to any assessment of the value of an additional source of irrigation water, particularly saline water. The approach has been illustrated with a case study of a mixed-crop farm in the Darling Downs region of Queensland, Australia, in which the farm-scale crop production, economic, and environmental implications of investing in recycled water were considered.

Additional keywords: on-farm water storage, APSIM, irrigated cotton.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the valuable cooperation and contribution of the Darling Downs farmers who participated in this study. Merv Probert, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Brisbane, contributed to the salt modelling aspects of the study. Members of the Darling Downs Vision 2000 Technical Sub-Committee provided valuable guidance. This study was jointly funded by CSIRO and Darling Downs Vision 2000 Inc.


References


Beeton RJS , Buckley KI , Jones GJ , Morgan D , Reichelt RE , Trewin D (2006) Australian State of the Environment Committee, Australia State of the Environment 2006. Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, ACT.

Bond WJ (1998) Effluent irrigation—an environmental challenge for soil science. Australian Journal of Soil Research 36, 543–555.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 14 July 2006).

Carberry PS, Hochman Z, McCown RL, Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA , et al . (2002) The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers’, advisers’, researchers’ monitoring, simulation, communication, and performance evaluation. Agricultural Systems 74, 141–178.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 2002).

Sinclair Knight Merz (2001) Conjunctive water use options in the northern Murray-Darling Basin. Final Report, Sinclair Knight Merz, Queensland.

Sinclair Knight Merz (2002) South East Queensland Recycled Water Project hydrological study. Final Report, Sinclair Knight Merz, Queensland.

Snow VO, Dillon PJ, Bond WJ, Smith CJ, Myers BM (1999) Groundwater contamination from effluent irrigation. Water (March/April), 26–29. open url image1

Toze S (2004) Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks. In ‘New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress’. Brisbane, Qld, 26 September–1 October 2004. (The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) www.regional.org.au

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services (1972) ‘SCS National engineering handbook, Section 4, Hydrology.’ (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services: Washington, DC)

Wang E , van Oosterom EJ , Meinke H , Asseng S , Robertson MJ , Huth NI , Keating BA , Probert ME (2003) The new APSIM-Wheat model—performance and future improvements. In ‘Solutions for a better environment. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Vic. (www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/p/2/wang.htm)

Watts PJ (1986) Irrigation design using whole farm computer simulations. In ‘Proceedings of Irrigation ’86 Conference’. 24–26 September. pp. 283–305. (Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education: Toowoomba, Qld)