Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. III. Broad-sense heritability of epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content

A. T. James A , R. J. Lawn B D and M. Cooper C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now CSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., PO Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email Robert.Lawn@jcu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(7) 679-689 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07161
Submitted: 19 April 2007  Accepted: 18 March 2008   Published: 3 July 2008

Abstract

The broad-sense heritability of 3 traits related to leaf survival in severely stressed plants was studied in several hybrid soybean populations. The 3 traits were epidermal conductance (ge), osmotic potential (π), and relative water content (RWC). The populations were generated by hybridising unrelated parental genotypes previously shown to differ in the 3 traits. ge (mm/s) was measured on well watered plants from 10 populations involving all combinations of 5 parental lines, grown in soil-filled beds in the glasshouse. π (MPa) and RWC (%) were measured on severely stressed plants of 3 populations involving all combinations of 3 different parents, growing into a terminal water deficit under a rainout shelter in the field. Broad-sense heritability for ge was significantly different from zero (P < 0.05) in all 10 populations and ranged from 60% to 93%. Heritability estimates for π70 (the tissue osmotic potential at 70% RWC) ranged from 33% to 71%. Only two estimates were statistically significant (P < 0.05) because of large standard errors and the fact that parental differences were smaller than previously observed. Broad-sense heritability for RWC of severely stressed plants ranged from 40% to 74%, and was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for 2 of the 3 populations. For all 3 traits, F2 progeny distributions were consistent with quantitative inheritance with a high degree of additive gene action. It was concluded that capacity exists to breed varieties with low ge, low π70, and high RWC in stressed plants. However, in the case of osmotic potential, genotypes with lower π70 combined with greater precision of measurement would be needed than proved possible in these studies. Further, specific strategies would be needed to select for the critical RWC, the minimal RWC at which leaf tissues die and which provides a measure of tissue dehydration tolerance. More research is also needed to characterise the dynamic relations between ge, π, and RWC in influencing leaf survival in soybean, before they could be confidently used in a breeding program to improve drought tolerance.

Additional keywords: breeding, drought resistance, leaf survival, turgor maintenance, physiology.


Acknowledgments

The research reported here was supported by CSIRO, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and was undertaken in partial fulfillment of the PhD degree awarded to ATJ by the University of Queensland in 2004.


References


Allard RW (1960) ‘Principles of plant breeding.’ (John Wiley and Sons: London)

Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Science 15, 413–428. open url image1

Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1159–1168.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Foale MA , Davis R , Macrae LC (1979) A versatile, low-budget, automatic rain shelter for small field experiments. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures Technical Memorandum No. 18.

Hiromoto DM, Vello NA (1986) The genetic base of Brazilian soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) cultivars. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 2, 295–306. open url image1

James AT, Lawn RJ, Cooper M (2008a) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. I. Variation in soybean and wild Glycine spp. for epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 656–669. open url image1

James AT, Lawn RJ, Cooper M (2008b) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. II. Inter-relations between epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, relative water content, and plant survival. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 670–678. open url image1

Lawn RJ (1982) Response of four grain legumes to water stress in south-eastern Queensland. I. Physiological response mechanisms. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 481–496.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lawn RJ, Imrie BC (1991) Crop improvement for tropical Australia: designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Research 26, 113–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Likoswe AA, Lawn RJ (2008) Response to terminal water deficit stress of cowpea, pigeonpea, and soybean in pure stand and in competition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 27–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43, 107–153.
Crossref |
open url image1

Morgan JM (1977) Differences in osmoregulation between wheat genotypes. Nature 270, 234–235.
Crossref |
open url image1

Morgan JM (1992) Adaptation to water deficits in three grain legume species. Mechanisms of turgor maintenance. Field Crops Research 29, 91–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JM (2000) Increases in grain yield of wheat by breeding for an osmoregulation gene: relationship to water supply and evaporative demand. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 971–978.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Muchow RC (1985) Stomatal behaviour in grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 11, 291–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nguyen HT, Chandra Babu R, Blum A (1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Science 37, 1426–1434. open url image1

Northcote KH (1971) ‘A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils.’ 3rd edn (Rellim Technical Publications: Glenside, S. Aust.)

Osborne R, Patterson WSB (1952) On the sampling variance of heritability estimates derived from variance analyses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B: Biology 694, 456–461. open url image1

Pajé M, Ludlow MM, Lawn RJ (1988) Variation among soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) accessions in epidermal conductance of leaves. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 363–373.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Richards RA (2004) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. In ‘Proceedings, 4th International Crop Science Congress’. Brisbane, Australia. Available at: www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/symposia/1/3/1470_richardsr.htm

Rose IA, McWhirter KS, Spurway RA (1992) Identification of drought-tolerance in early-maturing indeterminate soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 645–657.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shorter R, Lawn RJ, Hammer GL (1991) Improving genotypic adaptation in crops—a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155–175. open url image1

Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1986) Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 329–341.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Nageswara Rao RC, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 14, 469–523.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Summerfield RJ, Lawn RJ (1987) Tropical grain legume crops: a commentary. Outlook on Agriculture 16, 189–198. open url image1

Turner NC , Wright GC , Siddique KMH (2003) Adaptation of grain legumes to water-limited environments: selection for physiological, biochemical, and yield component characteristics for improved drought resistance. In ‘Management of agricultural drought: agronomic and genetic options’. (Ed. NP Saxena) pp. 43–80. (Science Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, NH)

Warner JW (1952) A method for estimating heritability. Agronomy Journal 44, 427–430. open url image1

Willis AJ , Jefferies RL (1963) Investigations on the water relations of sand-dune plants under natural conditions. In ‘The water relations of plants’. (Eds AJ Rutter, FH Whitehead) pp. 169–189. (Blackwell: Oxford, UK)