CSIRO Publishing

An international journal for chemical science

Shopping Cart: ( empty )

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 60(8)

A Facile and Efficient Conversion of Aldehydes into 1,1-Diacetates (Acylals) using Iron(iii) Fluoride as a Novel Catalyst

V. T. Kamble ^A ^D , R. A. Tayade ^B , B. S. Davane ^C and K. R. Kadam ^A

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Organic Chemistry Research Laboratory, School of Chemical Sciences, Swami Ramananad Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded 431 606, M.S., India.

^B Department of Chemistry, Institute of Science, Nagpur, M.S., India.

^C Department of Chemistry, Yeshwant College, Nanded, M.S., India.

^D Corresponding author. Email: vtkd@rediffmail.com

Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(8) 590-594 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH06166
Submitted: 16 May 2006 Accepted: 18 May 2007 Published: 9 August 2007

Abstract

Aldehydes are smoothly converted into the corresponding 1,1-diacetates (acylals) in high yields in the presence of a catalytic amount (0.1 mol-%) of iron(III) fluoride at room temperature. The noteworthy features of the present system are shorter reaction times, chemoselective protection of aldehydes, and solvent-free conditions. The procedure is especially useful for large-scale syntheses as the catalyst is highly effective from the view of activity, selectivity, reusability, and economy in the preparation of 1,1-diacetates (acylals).

References

[1] (a) Greene T. M., Wuts P. G. M., Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd edn 1999, p. 306 (Wiley: New York, NY).
       (b) M. J. Gregory, J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 1201.
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |



        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |





        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |


        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |