Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
REVIEW

Epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata) of barley: a review

Mark S. McLean A C , Barbara J. Howlett B and Grant J. Hollaway A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A BioScience Research, Department of Primary Industries, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.

B School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: mark.mclean@dpi.vic.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 60(4) 303-315 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08173
Submitted: 19 May 2008  Accepted: 23 January 2009   Published: 21 April 2009

Abstract

Spot form of net blotch (SFNB), caused by the fungus Pyrenophora teres f. maculata, was first described in Denmark in the 1960s and is now a prevalent foliar disease of barley in many countries. This disease should be controlled as a separate disease-causing organism from the net form of net blotch (NFNB), which is caused by P. teres f. teres. The increase in prevalence of SFNB is primarily due to stubble retention and cultivation of susceptible varieties, which have resulted in increased inoculum. Infected barley stubble is the primary inoculum source for SFNB, producing both asexual spores (conidia) and sexual spores (ascospores) from pseudothecia. Spot form of net blotch causes significant losses in grain yield and quality in situations where inoculum is present, susceptible varieties are cultivated, and where the climate is cool and moist. Cultivation of resistant varieties is the most cost-effective method for control of SFNB and more than 12 different resistance sources have been identified in barley germplasm and wild barley relatives. The resistance loci of 11 of these have been mapped. Control of SFNB can also be achieved with application of foliar fungicides, crop rotation, and stubble destruction.

Additional keywords: pathogenic variation, host-plant resistance, chemical control, fungal mating type.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Victorian Department of Primary Industries for funding and support, and Trevor Bretag and Jacky Edwards for comments on this manuscript.


References


Abbott DC, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1992) Genes for scald resistance from wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) and their linkage to isozyme markers. Euphytica 61, 225–231.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Adee EA, Pfender WF (1989) The effect of primary inoculum level of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis on tan spot epidemic development in wheat. Phytopathology 79, 873–877.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Arabi MIE, Al-Safadi B, Charbaji T (2003) Pathogenic variation among isolates of Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. Journal of Phytopathology 151, 376–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Arabi MIE, Barrault G, Sarrafi A, Albertini L (1992) Variation in the resistance of barley cultivars and in the pathogenicity of Drechslera teres f. sp. maculata and D. teres f. sp. teres isolates from France. Plant Pathology 41, 180–186.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Arvidsson J, Rydberg T, Feiza V (2000) Early sowing – a system for reduced seedbed preparation in Sweden. Soil & Tillage Research 53, 145–155.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bakonyi J, Justesen AF (2007) Genetic relationship of Pyrenophora graminea, P. teres f. maculata and P. teres f. teres assessed by RAPD analysis. Journal of Phytopathology 155, 76–83.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Bartlett DW, Clough JM, Godwin JR, Hall AA, Hamer M, Parr-Dobrzanski B (2002) The strobilurin fungicides. Pest Management Science 58, 649–662.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Beattie AD, Scoles GJ, Rossnagel BG (2007) Identification of molecular markers linked to a Pyrenophora teres avirulence gene. Phytopathology 97, 842–849.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bockelman HE, Sharp EL, Bjarko ME (1983) Isolates of Pyrenophora teres from Montana and the Mediterranean region that produce spot-type lesions on barley. Plant Disease 67, 696–697.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brennan RF, Jayasena KW (2007) Increasing applications of potassium fertiliser to barley crops grown on deficient sandy soils increased grain yields while decreasing some foliar diseases. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 680–689.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Brown MP, Steffenson BJ, Webster RK (1993) Host range of Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates from California. Plant Disease 77, 942–947. open url image1

Campbell GF, Crous PW (2002) Fungicide sensitivity of South African net- and spot-type isolates of Pyrenophora teres to ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors. Australasian Plant Pathology 31, 151–155.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Campbell GF, Crous PW (2003) Genetic stability of net × spot hybrid progeny of the barley pathogen Pyrenophora teres. Australasian Plant Pathology 32, 283–287.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Campbell GF, Crous PW, Lucas JA (1999) Pyrenophora teres f. maculata, the cause of Pyrenophora leaf spot of barley in South Africa. Journal of Mycological Research 103, 257–267.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Campbell GF, Lucas JA, Crous PW (2002) Evidence of recombination between net- and spot-type populations of Pyrenophora teres as determined by RAPD analysis. Mycological Research 106, 602–608.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Deadman ML, Cooke BM (1989) An analysis of rain-mediated dispersal of Drechslera teres conidia in field plots of spring barley. Annals of Applied Biology 115, 209–214.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Duczek LJ, Sutherland KA, Reed SL, Bailey KL, Lafond GP (1999) Survival of leaf spot pathogens on crop residues of wheat and barley in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 21, 165–173. open url image1

Ellis MB (1979) ‘Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes.’ (Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Surrey, England)

Ellis MB Waller JM (1973) Pyrenophora teres. CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria No. 390.

Friesen TL, Faris JD, Lai Z, Steffenson BJ (2006) Identification and chromosomal location of major genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres in a doubled-haploid barley population. Genome 49, 855–859.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Gallagher JN, Biscoe PV, Scott RK (1975) Barley and its environment. V. stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 319–336.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gay A Leon J (2004) QTL for Drechslera teres-resistance in barley. In ‘The 9th International Barley Genetics Symposium, Book of Abstracts’. Brno, Czech Republic. Available at: www.ibgs.cz/photos/book_of_abstracts/abstracts.htm

Grewal TS, Rossnagel BG, Pozniak CJ, Scoles GJ (2007) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with barley net blotch resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116, 529–539.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Grewal TS, Rossnagel BG, Scoles GJ (2008) The utility of molecular markers for barley net blotch resistance across geographic regions. Crop Science 48, 2321–2333.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gupta S , Li CD , Cakir M , Loughman R , Lance R , Appels R , Jones M (2006) Resistance for leaf blight diseases in barley populations. In ‘Proceeding of the 3rd International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blight’. Edmonton, Canada. pp. 36–38.

Gupta S, Loughman R (2001) Current virulence of Pyrenophora teres on barley in Western Australia. Plant Disease 85, 960–966.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hampton JG (1977) Net blotch of barley. In ‘Proceedings of Net Blotch of Barley Conference’. Palmerston North, New Zealand. pp. 2–6.

Hargreaves JA, Keon JPR (1983) The binding of isolated mesophyll cells from barley leaves of hyphae of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Cell Reports 2, 240–243.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ho KM, Tekauz A, Choo TM, Martin RA (1996) Genetic studies on net blotch resistance in barley cross. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 4, 715–719. open url image1

Jayasena KW, George E, Loughman R, Hardy G (2004) First record of the teleomorph stage of Drechslera teres f. maculata in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 33, 455–456.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jayasena KW, Loughman R, Majewski J (2002) Evaluation of fungicides in control of spot-type net blotch on barley. Crop Protection 21, 63–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Jayasena KW, van Burgel A, Tanaka K, Mejewski J, Loughman R (2007) Yield reduction in barley in relation to spot-type net blotch. Australasian Plant Pathology 36, 429–433.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jordan VWL (1981) Aetiology of barley net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres and some effects on yield. Plant Pathology 30, 77–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jordan VW, Allen E (1984) Barley net blotch: influence of straw disposal and cultivation methods on inoculum potential, and on incidence and severity of autumn disease. Plant Pathology 33, 547–559.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jorgensen J (1980) Comparitive testing of barley seed for inoculum of Pyrenophora graminea and P. teres in glasshouse and field. Seed Science and Technology 8, 377–381. open url image1

Jorgensen JH, Bech C, Jensen J (2000) Reaction of European spring barley varieties to a population of the net blotch fungus. Plant Breeding 119, 43–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Karki CB (1986) Pathogenic variation in some isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. sp. maculata on Barley. Plant Disease 70, 684–687.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Keiper FJ, Capio E, Grcic M, Wallwork H (2007) Development of sequence-tagged microsatellites for barley net blotch pathogen, Pyrenophora teres. Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 664–666.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Keiper FJ, Capio E, Grcic M, Wallwork H (2008) Diagnostic microsatellite markers for the barley net blotch pathogens, Pyrenophora teres f. maculata and Pyrenophora teres f. teres. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 428–430.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Khan TN (1982) Occurrence and pathogenicity of Drechslera teres isolates causing spot-type symptoms on barley in Western Australia. Plant Disease 66, 423–425. open url image1

Khan TN (1987) Relationship between net blotch (Drechslera teres) and losses in grain yield of barley in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 671–679.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Khan TN (1989) Effect of spot-type net blotch (Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Shoem) infection on barley yield in short season environment of northern cereal belt of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 745–752.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lai Z, Faris JD, Weiland JJ, Steffenson BJ, Friesen TL (2007) Genetic mapping of Pyrenophra teres f. teres genes conferring avirulence on barley. Fungal Genetics and Biology 44, 323–329.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Leisova L, Kucera L, Minarikova V, Ovesna J (2005) AFLP-based PCR markers that differentiate spot and net forms of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Pathology 54, 66–73.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Leisova L, Minarikova V, Kucera L, Ovesna J (2006) Quantification of Pyrenophora teres in infected barley leaves using real-time PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods 67, 446–455.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Louw JPJ, Crous PW, Holz G (1996) Relative importance of the barley net blotch pathogens Pyrenophora teres f. teres (net-type) and P. teres f. maculata (spot-type) in South Africa. African Plant Protection 2, 89–95. open url image1

Makela K (1972) Leaf spot fungi on barley in Finland. Acta Agralia Fennica 124, 22. open url image1

Makela K (1975) Occurrence of Helminthosporium species on cereals in Finland in 1971–1978. Journal of Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 47, 181–217. open url image1

Manninen OM, Jalli M, Kalender R, Schulman A, Afanasenko O, Robinson J (2006) Mapping of major spot-type and net-type net-blotch resistance genes in the Ethiopian barley line CI9819. Genome 49, 1564–1571.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

McDonald WC (1963) Heterothallism in Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathology 53, 771–773. open url image1

McDonald BA, Linde C (2002) Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40, 349–379.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Molnar SJ, James LE, Kasha KJ (2000) Inheritance and RAPD tagging of multiple genes for resistance to net blotch in barley. Genome 43, 224–231.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Olvång H (1988) Sensitivity of Drechslera teres and Septoria nodorum to sterol-biosynthesis inhibitors. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 94, 57–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Paveley ND, Lockley D, Vaughan TB, Thomas J, Schmidt K (2000) Predicting effective fungicide doses through observation of leaf emergence. Plant Pathology 49, 748–766.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Peever TL, Milgroom MG (1992) Inheritance of triadimenol resistance in Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathology 82, 821–828.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Peever TL, Milgroom MG (1993) Genetic correlations in resistance to sterol biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicides in Pyrenophora teres. Phytopathology 83, 1076–1082.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Rau D, Attene G, Brown AHD, Nanni L, Maier FJ, Balmas V, Saba E, Schafer W, Papa R (2007) Phylogeny and evolution of mating-type genes from Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley “net blotch” disease. Current Genetics 51, 377–392.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Rau D, Brown AHD, Brubaker CL, Attene G, Balmas V, Saba E, Papa R (2003) Population genetic structure of Pyrenophora teres Drechs. the causal agent of net blotch in Sardinian landraces of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 947–959.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Rau D, Maier FJ, Papa R, Brown HD, Balmas V, Saba E, Schaefer W, Attene G (2005) Isolation and characterisation of mating-type locus of the barley pathogen Pyrenophora teres and frequencies of mating-type idiomorphs within and among fungal populations collected from barley landraces. Genome 48, 855–869.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Robinson J (2000) Yield of doubled haploid lines of Nordic spring barley infected with net blotch, Pyrenophora teres. Plant Breeding 119, 219–222.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sampson MG, Watson AK (1985) Host specificity of five leaf-spotting pathogens of Agropyron repens. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 7, 161–164. open url image1

Sarpeleh A, Wallwork H, Catcheside DEA, Tate ME, Able A (2007) Proteinaceaous metabolites from Pyrenophora teres contribute to symptom development of barley net blotch. Biochemistry and Cell Biology 97, 907–915.
CAS |
open url image1

Sato K, Takeda K (1997) Net blotch resistance in wild species of Hordeum. Euphytica 95, 179–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scott DB (1991) Identity of Pyrenophora isolates causing net-type and spot-type lesions on barley. Mycopathologia 116, 29–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scott DB, van Niekerk HA, Paxton TG (1992) Effect of propoconazole on necrotrophic fungi and yield of barley genotypes differing in susceptibility to Rhynchosporium secalis. Crop Protection 11, 243–247.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Serenius M, Manninen O (2006) Prochloraz tolerance of Pyrenophora teres population in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science 15, 35–42.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Serenius M, Manninen O, Wallwork H, Williams K (2007) Genetic differentiation in Pyrenophora teres populations measured with AFLP markers. Mycological Research 111, 213–223.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Serenius M, Mironenko N, Manninen O (2005) Genetic variation, occurrence of mating types and different forms of Pyrenophora teres causing net blotch of barley in Finland. Mycological Research 109, 809–817.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Smedegard-Petersen V (1971) Pyrenophora teres f. maculata f. nov. and Pyrenophora teres f. teres on barley in Denmark. Aarsskrift Kongelige Veterinear of Landbohojskole , 124–144. open url image1

Steffenson BJ (1997) Net blotch. In ‘Compendium of barley diseases’. 2nd edn. (Ed. DE Mather) pp. 28–31. (The American Phytopathological Society: Bozeman, USA)

Sutton JC, Steele P (1983) Effects of seed and foliar fungicides on progress of net blotch and yield in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63, 631–639. open url image1

Tekauz A (1978) Incidence and severity of net blotch of barley and distribution of Pyrenophora teres biotypes in the Canadian prairies in 1976. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 58, 9–11. open url image1

Tekauz A (1990) Characterisation and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata from western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12, 141–148. open url image1

Tuohy J, Jalli M, Cooke BM, O’Sullivan E (2006) Pathogenic variation in populations of Dreshlera teres f. sp. teres and Dreshlera teres f. sp. maculata and differences in host cultivar responses. European Journal of Plant Pathology 116, 177–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

van den Berg CGJ (1988) Epidemiology of Pyrenophora teres and its effect on grain yield of Hordeum vulgare. PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

van den Berg CGJ, Rossnagel BG (1990) Effect of tilt on severity of spot-type net blotch, grain yield and yield components in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70, 473–480. open url image1

van den Berg CGJ, Rossnagel BG (1991) Epidemiology of spot-type net blotch on spring barley in Saskatchewan. Phytopathology 81, 1446–1452.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wallwork H (1995) Barley leaf blights in Australia and New Zealand: historical perspective and current situation. Rachis 14, 75–81. open url image1

Wallwork H (2000) ‘Cereal leaf and stem disease (2004 edition).’ (South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI): Adelaide)

Wallwork H, Lichon A, Sivanesan A (1992) Pyrenophora hordei – a new ascomycete with Drechslera anamorph affecting barley in Australia. Mycological Research 96, 1068–1070.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weiergang I, Lyngs Jorgensen HJ, Moller IM, Friis P, Smedegaard-Petersen V (2002) Correlation between sensitivity of barley to Pyrenophora teres toxins and susceptibility to the fungus. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 60, 121–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Weller JA, Rossnagel BG (1988) Saskatchewan barley leaf disease survey. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 68, 38. open url image1

Williams KJ, Lichon A, Gianquitto P, Kretschmer JM, Karakousis A, Manning S, Langridge P, Wallwork H (1999) Identification and mapping of a gene conferring resistance to the spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata) in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99, 323–327.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams KJ, Platz GJ, Barr AR, Cheong J, Willsmore K, Cakir M, Wallwork H (2003) A comparison of the genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to the spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1387–1394.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Williams KJ, Smyl C, Lichon A, Wong KY, Wallwork H (2001) Development and use of an assay based on the polymerase chain reaction that differentiates the pathogens causing spot form and net form of net blotch of barley. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 37–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wu HL, Steffenson BJ, Oleson AE, Zhong S (2003) Genetic variation for virulence and RFLP markers in Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 25, 82–90.
CAS |
open url image1

Youcef-Benkada M, Bendahmane BS, Barrault AASY, Albertini L (1994) Effects of inoculation of barley inflorescences with Drechslera teres upon the location of seed-borne inoculum and its transmission to seedlings as modified by temperature and soil moisture. Plant Pathology 43, 350–355.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yousfi BE, Ezzahiri B (2002) Net blotch in semi-arid regions of Morrocco ll: Yield and yield-loss modelling. Field Crops Research 73, 81–93.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhang W, Pfender WF (1992) Effect of residue management on wetness duration and ascocarp production by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis in wheat residue. Phytopathology 82, 1434–1439.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1