Managing soil-borne crop diseases using precision agriculture in Australia
J. W. Heap A B and A. C. McKay AA South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: heap.john@saugov.sa.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 60(9) 824-833 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08345
Submitted: 9 October 2008 Accepted: 25 May 2009 Published: 8 September 2009
Abstract
Field experiments in southern Australia examined the spatial distribution of soil-borne disease inoculum within paddocks using DNA-based soil assays. Paddocks were divided into zones using cluster analysis for a range of combinations of digital data layers. Inoculum levels differed among zones in 33–64% of the 108 cases examined, depending on the zone model used. It was concluded that zone models used for precision agriculture (PA) most commonly in Australia (viz. zones based on cluster analysis of grain yield maps, ECa, and elevation, and zones based on satellite biomass imagery) were most suitable for partitioning inoculum distribution within paddocks. Generally there was a correlation between pre-sowing levels of inoculum and crop root damage and shoot biomass; however, there was not always a strong correlation between inoculum level and grain yield. There was some evidence that damage/unit soil inoculum varied among zones, but difficulties in predicting this a priori suggest that the damage rate should be assumed to be equal among zones.
It is suggested that crop managers divide paddocks into yield or management zones and test each zone before every crop, using an appropriate soil sampling protocol. The disease risk and yield potential for each zone should then be considered to decide whether differential management is feasible or warranted. A soil test based on one composite paddock sample gives a paddock average only, which in many cases gives insufficient information about varying inoculum levels for robust zone management. If testing of every zone is not possible, then zones with the highest risk to profit from disease damage should be tested, to minimise risk. As PA technologies and biological understanding of disease behaviour improve, crop managers will have greater opportunities to exploit the non-random spatial distribution of soil-borne disease inoculum in new and imaginative ways at the zone level.
Additional keywords: zones, disease management, disease inoculum, spatial distribution.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) of Australia, the Australian Government, and the South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI). Growers are thanked for kindly making paddocks available for field work. Colleagues and collaborators in SARDI, CSIRO, GRDC SIP09 project, Australian Centre for Precision Agriculture, and Silverfox Solutions are also thanked for their assistance. Mr. Chris Dyson (SARDI) is thanked for assistance with statistical analyses. Staff members of the SARDI Plant and Soil Health Diagnostics laboratory are thanked for provision of PCR-based soil DNA assays and other laboratory work.
Ettema CD, Wardle D
(2002) Spatial soil ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17(4), 177–183.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rovira A
(1990) Ecology, epidemiology and control of take-all, Rhizoctonia bare patch and cereal cyst nematode in wheat—1989 Daniel McAlpine Memorial Lecture. Australasian Plant Pathology 19(4), 101–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
