Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of sowing date and cultivar on radiation use efficiency in durum wheat

Simona Bassu A B , Francesco Giunta A and Rosella Motzo A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche e Genetica Vegetale Agraria, Facoltà di Agraria, Università di Sassari, Via De Nicola, 07100 Sassari, Italy.

B Corresponding author. Email: sbassu@uniss.it

Crop and Pasture Science 62(1) 39-47 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10137
Submitted: 22 April 2010  Accepted: 17 December 2010   Published: 12 January 2011

Abstract

Field studies were conducted on durum wheat to assess the effects of three sowing dates and three cultivars with different flowering times on the stability of the biomass accumulated per unit of solar radiation intercepted that is usually considered constant in crop-simulation models. Aboveground dry matter varied widely, with minimum values ranging from 292 g m–2 at booting to 384 g m–2 at maturity and maximum values ranging from 1452 g m–2 at booting to 2565 g m–2 at maturity. The cumulative intercepted radiation at each phenological stage decreased as sowing was delayed. The leaf area index (LAI) ranged from 1.5 to 7.6 at booting and from 0.1 to 4.6 at the beginning of grain filling across treatments. Sowing dates and cultivars did not differ significantly in extinction coefficient values (0.38 ± 0.015). The estimated radiation use efficiency (eRUE) differed significantly between the two seasons (1.16 ± 0.09 g MJ–1 in 2000 and 1.61 ± 0.08 g MJ–1 in 2001) due to waterlogging in 2000 but did not differ among sowing dates and cultivars within each season. Under optimal growing conditions, eRUE of different cultivars of durum wheat were relatively stable across sowing dates, confirming their reliability for crop modelling in durum wheat as well as in bread wheat. Although eRUE was constant over the whole crop cycle regardless of the sowing date, it was lower at pre-anthesis in the latest sowing, in parallel with the variation in LAI. This study indicates that pre-anthesis eRUE may vary with sowing date under some conditions, depending on the variation in LAI in the period before anthesis.

Additional keywords: leaf area index, radiation extinction coefficient, radiation interception, sowing time, wheat.


References

Austin RB, Ford MA, Edrich JA, Hooper BE (1976) Some effects of leaf posture on photosynthesis and yield in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 425–446.
Some effects of leaf posture on photosynthesis and yield in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bassu S, Giunta F, Motzo R (2010) Effects of sowing date and cultivar on spike weight and kernel number in durum wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 287–295.
Effects of sowing date and cultivar on spike weight and kernel number in durum wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borrell AK, Hammer GL (2000) Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum. Crop Science 40, 1295–1307.
Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brisson N, Gary C, Justes E, Roche R, Mary B, Ripoche D, Zimmer D, Sierra J, Bertuzzi P, Burger P, Bussière F, Cabidoche YM, Cellier P, Debaeke P, Gaudillère JP, Hénault C, Maraux F, Seguin B, Sinoquet H (2003) An overview of the crop model STICS. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 309–332.
An overview of the crop model STICS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ewert F (2004) Modelling plant responses to elevated CO2: how important is Leaf Area Index? Annals of Botany 93, 619–627.
Modelling plant responses to elevated CO2: how important is Leaf Area Index?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15102613PubMed |

Giunta F, Motzo R (2004) Sowing rate and cultivar affect total biomass and grain yield of spring triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) grown in a Mediterranean-type environment. Field Crops Research 87, 179–193.
Sowing rate and cultivar affect total biomass and grain yield of spring triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) grown in a Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gómez-Macpherson H, Richards RA (1995) Effect of sowing time on yield and agronomic characteristics of wheat in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1381–1399.
Effect of sowing time on yield and agronomic characteristics of wheat in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gregory PG, Eastham J (1996) Growth of shoots and roots, and interception of radiation by wheat and lupin crops on a shallow, duplex soil in response to time of sowing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 427–447.
Growth of shoots and roots, and interception of radiation by wheat and lupin crops on a shallow, duplex soil in response to time of sowing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hay RKM, Walker AJ (1989) ‘An introduction to the physiology of crop yield.’ (Longman Scientific and Technical: Harlow, England)

Incerti M, O’Leary GJ (1990) Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 817–824.
Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones CA, Dyke PT, Williams JR, Kiniry JR, Benson CA, Griggs RH (1991) EPIC: an operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability. Agricultural Systems 37, 341–350.
EPIC: an operational model for evaluation of agricultural sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keating BA, Meinke H, Probert ME, Huth NI, Hills I (1997) Nwheat: documentation and performance of a wheat module for APSIM. Tropical Agriculture Technical Memo, CSIRO Division of Tropical Agriculture, St Lucia, Qld.

Loomis RS, Connor DJ (1992) ‘Crop ecology.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

López-Castañeda C, Richards R (1994) Variation in temperate cereals in rain-fed environments. II. Phasic development and growth. Field Crops Research 37, 63–75.
Variation in temperate cereals in rain-fed environments. II. Phasic development and growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (1997) Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of near-isogenic wheat lines with different height. Euphytica 97, 201–208.
Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of near-isogenic wheat lines with different height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monteith JL (1965) Light and crop production. Field Crop Abstracts 18, 213–219.

Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 281, 277–294.
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morgan JA, LeCain DR, Wells R (1990) Semidwarfing genes concentrate photosynthetic machinery and affect leaf gas exchange of wheat. Crop Science 30, 602–608.

Muchow RC (1989) Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment. II. Effect of water deficits. Field Crops Research 20, 207–219.
Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment. II. Effect of water deficits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muchow RC (1994) Effect of nitrogen on yield determination in irrigated maize in tropical and sub-tropical environments. Field Crops Research 38, 1–13.
Effect of nitrogen on yield determination in irrigated maize in tropical and sub-tropical environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Pengelly BC (1993) Radiation-use efficiency of soybean, mungbean and cowpea under different environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 32, 1–16.
Radiation-use efficiency of soybean, mungbean and cowpea under different environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nàtrovà Z, Jokes M (1993) A proposal for a decimal scale of the inflorescence development of wheat. Rostlinna Vyroba 39, 315–328.

Reynolds MP, Pellegrineschi A, Skovmand B (2005) Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 146, 39–49.
Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ritchie JT, Godwin DC, Otter S (1985) ‘CERES-wheat: a user-oriented wheat yield model. Preliminary documentation.’ (Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI)

Sands PJ (1996) Modelling canopy production. III. Canopy light-utilisation efficiency and its sensitivity to physiological and environmental variables. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 103–114.
Modelling canopy production. III. Canopy light-utilisation efficiency and its sensitivity to physiological and environmental variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Horie T (1989) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Science 29, 90–98.
Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65, 215–265.
Radiation use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) ‘Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach.’ (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company: New York)

Stöckle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R (2003) CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 289–307.
CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Takahashi T, Nakaseko K (1993) Seasonal changes in distribution of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation for layer and dry matter production in spring wheat canopy. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 62, 313–318.

Yunusa IAM, Siddique KHM, Belford RK, Karimi MM (1993) Effect of canopy structure on efficiency of radiation interception and use in spring wheat cultivars during the pre-anthesis period in a Mediterranean-type environment. Field Crops Research 35, 113–122.
Effect of canopy structure on efficiency of radiation interception and use in spring wheat cultivars during the pre-anthesis period in a Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |