Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A comparison of rock physics models for fluid substitution in carbonate rocks

Ali Misaghi 1 3 5 Sajjad Negahban 2 Martin Landrø 3 Abdolrahim Javaherian 4
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Dana Geophysics Company, Golestan Street, Iran Zamin Avenue, Shahrak-e-Qods, Tehran 1465865187, Iran.

2 Amirkabir University of Technology, No. 242, Hafiz Street, Tehran, P.O.B. 15875-4413, Iran.

3 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, S.P. Andersens vei 15A, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

4 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, North Karegar Avenue, Tehran 1435944411, Iran.

5 Corresponding author. Email: ali.misaghi@gmail.com

Exploration Geophysics 41(2) 146-154 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09035
Submitted: 25 July 2009  Accepted: 17 February 2010   Published: 7 June 2010

Abstract

Rock physics models play a crucial role in seismic reservoir characterisation studies. The optimal rock physics model for a sandstone reservoir might be significantly different from that of a carbonate reservoir. There are several theories that compare the elastic properties of dry and saturated rocks. These models have mainly been explained by poroelastic theories or effective medium theories. The Gassmann’s model which is commonly used in petroleum rock physics is suitable for rocks with spherical and interconnected pores at low frequencies. These assumptions do not necessarily meet the conditions of carbonate rocks. In this work, two additional models, the differential effective medium (DEM) model and the self-consistent (SC) model have been examined for several carbonate samples. Ultrasonic 30 carbonate and 5 sandstone core samples from an oilfield in south-west Iran were measured in the laboratory. The results show that the DEM model gives the best compatibility with the dense and low porous carbonate samples. These results are confirmed by well log data from the same area.

Key words: carbonate reservoirs, differential effective medium model, Gassmann’s model, rock physics, self-consistent model.


Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the Research Institute of Petroleum Industry of Iran (RIPI) for permission to use the data. Martin Landrø thanks the Norwegian Research Council for financial support to the ROSE project at NTNU.


References

Adam L. , Batzle M. , and Brevik I. , 2005, Gassmann’s fluid substitution paradox on carbonates: seismic and ultrasonic frequencies: Presented at the 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, 24, 1521–1524.

Adam, L., Batzle, M., and Brevik, I., 2006, Gassmann’s fluid substitution and shear modulus variability in carbonates at laboratory seismic and ultrasonic frequencies: Geophysics 71, F173–F183.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Berryman J. G. , 1995, Mixture theories for rock properties, In T. J. Ahrens, (Ed.), Rock physics and phase relations, A handbook of physics constants, 205–228, American Geophysical Union.

Berryman, J. G., 1999, Origin of Gassmann’s equations: Geophysics 64, 1627–1629.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Berryman J. G. , and Berge P. A. , 1993, Rock elastic properties: Dependence on microstructure: in homogenization and constitutive modeling for heterogeneous materials, In C. S. Cheng, and J. W. Ju, (Eds), AMSE, New York, 1–13.

Berryman, J. G., Pride, S. R., and Wang, H. F., 2002, A differential scheme for elastic properties of rocks with dry or saturated cracks: Geophysical Journal International 151, 597–611.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bourbié T. , Coussy O. , and Zinszner B. , 1987, Acoustics of porous media, Ed. Technip, Paris.

Budiansky, B., 1965, On the elastic moduli of some heterogeneous materials: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 13, 223–227.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Carmichael R. S. , 1989, Practical handbook of physical properties of rocks and minerals: CRC Press, 741 p.

Domenico, S. N., 1984, Rock lithology and porosity determination from shear and compressional wave velocity: Geophysics 49, 1188–1195.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Japsen P. , Høier C. , Rasmussen K. L. , Fabricius I. , Mavko G. , and Pedersen J. M. , 2002, Effect of fluid substitution on ultrasonic velocities on chalk plugs, South Arne field, North Sea: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 21, 1881–1884.

Kerner, E. H., 1956, The elastic and thermoelastic properties of composite media: Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B 69, 808–813.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mavko G. , Mukerji T. , and Dvorkin J. , 1998, The rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis in porous media: Cambridge University Press.

Palaz I. and Marfurt K. , J., 1997, Carbonate seismology: Society of exploration geophysicists.

Plona, T. J., 1980, Observation of a second bulk compressional wave in a fluid-saturated porous solid at ultrasonic frequencies: Applied Physics Letters 36, 259–261.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Prasad M. , and Nur A. , 2003, Velocity and attenuation anisotropy in reservoir rocks: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 22, 1652–1655.

Rafavich, F., Kendall, C. H. St. C., and Todd, T. P., 1984, The relationship between acoustic properties and the petrographic character of carbonate rocks: Geophysics 49, 1622–1636.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | White J. E. , 1983, Underground sound: Application of seismic waves: Elsevier Science Publishing Co..

Wu, T. T., 1966, The effect of inclusion shape on the elastic moduli of a two-phase material: International Journal of Solids and Structures 2, 1–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wyllie, M. R. J., Gardner, G. H. F., and Gregory, A. R., 1963, Addendum to studies of elastic wave attenuation in porous media: Geophysics 28, 1074.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |