Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists

The magnetotelluric tensor: improved invariants for its decomposition, especially ‘the 7th’

Frederick E. M. Lilley
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Email: ted.lilley@anu.edu.au

Exploration Geophysics - https://doi.org/10.1071/EG17053
Submitted: 10 April 2017  Accepted: 22 September 2017   Published online: 27 October 2017

Journal Compilation © ASEG 2017 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND


A decomposition of the magnetotelluric tensor is described in terms of quantities which are invariant to the rotation of observing axes, and which also are distinct measures of the 1D, 2D or 3D characteristics of the tensor and so may be useful in dimensionality analysis. When the in-phase and quadrature parts of the tensor are analysed separately there are two invariants which gauge 1D structure, two invariants which gauge 2D structure, and three invariants which gauge 3D structure. A matrix method similar to singular value decomposition is used to determine many of the invariants, and their display is then possible on Mohr diagrams. A particular set of invariants proposed some seventeen years ago is revised to yield an improved set. Several possibilities for the seventh invariant are canvassed, and illustrated by examples from field data. Low values of Δβ, the invariant now preferred for ‘the 7th’, may indicate a particular simplification of otherwise complicated three-dimensional structure.

Key words: crustal structure, decomposition, electromagnetic methods, magnetotellurics, tensor.


Bahr, K., 1988, Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion: Journal of Geophysics, 62, 119–127.

Bahr, K., 1991, Geological noise in magnetotelluric data: a classification of distortion types: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 66, 24–38. 10.1016/0031-9201(91)90101-M

Berdichevsky, M. N., and Dimitriev, V. I., 1976, Basic principles of interpretation of magnetotelluric curves, in A. Adam, ed., Geoelectric and geothermal studies, KAPG geophysical monograph: Akademiai Kaido Budapest, 165–221.

Berdichevsky, M. N., and Dmitriev, V. I., 2008, Models and methods of magnetotellurics: Springer.

Caldwell, T. G., Bibby, H. M., and Brown, C., 2004, The magnetotelluric phase tensor: Geophysical Journal International, 158, 457–469. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02281.x

Chave, A. D., and Jones, A. G., eds., 2012, The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press.

Hobbs, B. A., 1992, Terminology and symbols for use in studies of electromagnetic induction in the Earth: Surveys in Geophysics, 13, 489–515. 10.1007/BF01903487

Ingham, M. R., 1988, The use of invariant impedances in magnetotelluric interpretation: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 92, 165–169. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1988.tb01130.x

Jones, A. G., 2012, Distortion of magnetotelluric data: its identification and removal, in A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, eds., The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press, 219–302.

Lilley, F. E. M., 1993, Magnetotelluric analysis using Mohr circles: Geophysics, 58, 1498–1506. 10.1190/1.1443364

Lilley, F. E. M., 1998, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part I, Theory for a basic procedure: Geophysics, 63, 1885–1897. 10.1190/1.1444481

Lilley, F. E. M., 2012, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: insights from linear algebra and Mohr diagrams, in H. S. Lim, ed., New achievements in geoscience: InTech Open Science, 81–106.

Lilley, F. E. M., 2016, The distortion tensor of magnetotellurics: a tutorial on some properties: Exploration Geophysics, 47, 85–99. 10.1071/EG14093

Marti, A., 2014, The role of electrical anisotropy in magnetotelluric responses: from modelling and dimensionality analysis to inversion and interpretation: Surveys in Geophysics, 35, 179–218. 10.1007/s10712-013-9233-3

Marti, A., Queralt, P., Jones, A. G., and Ledo, J., 2005, Improving Bahr’s invariant parameters using the WAL approach: Geophysical Journal International, 163, 38–41. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02748.x

Marti, A., Queralt, P., and Ledo, J., 2009, WALDIM: a code for the dimensionality analysis of magnetotelluric data using the rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric tensor: Computers & Geosciences, 35, 2295–2303. 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.03.004

Marti, A., Queralt, P., Ledo, J., and Farquharson, C., 2010, Dimensionality imprint of electrical anisotropy in magnetotelluric responses: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 182, 139–151. 10.1016/j.pepi.2010.07.007

Simpson, F., and Bahr, K., 2005, Practical magnetotellurics: Cambridge University Press.

Strang, G., 2003, Introduction to linear algebra (3rd edition): Wellesley–Cambridge Press.

Szarka, L., and Menvielle, M., 1997, Analysis of rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Geophysical Journal International, 129, 133–142. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb00942.x

Weaver, J. T., Agarwal, A. K., and Lilley, F. E. M., 2000, Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants: Geophysical Journal International, 141, 321–336. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00089.x

Weidelt, P., and Chave, A. D., 2012, The magnetotelluric response function, in A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, eds., The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press, 122–164.

Young, H. D., and Freedman, R. A., 2016, University physics with modern physics (14th edition): Pearson Global.

Full Text PDF (1.4 MB) Export Citation